Black man assaults Tea Party protester in North Carolina.
Notice I didn't say "Tea Party" attacks black man. The left really hates it when people other then themselves exercises their freedom of speech and their right to assemble. There must be something about the state of North Carolina that make liberals in that state go violent. Last week Rep. Bob Etheridge's attacked a college kid for merely asking a simple question. Here's the latest story of left wing violent aggression against a person who holds an opposing view. A few days ago a black liberal psychically attacked Nathan Tabor who is a member of the North Carolina Tea Party and is also the chariman of the North Carolina Republican Party. I'm still waiting for the left to provide evidence of Tea Party mob anger and hate. In the meantime, here's yet another piece of evidence of left wing intolerant hatred in action.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 5:45 PM
10 Comments:
I'm not shocked by the thug mentality of leftists nor the seething hatred they have for people who disagree with them.
I'm not shocked either. Some liberals are as evil as evil can get. The liberals of today are nothing like the flower power liberals of the wood stock era. These people are viciously intolerant.
I thoroughly enjoy to see fellow Black Americans who refuse to bow to the hype of having a "Black" president.
The mainstream media doesn't run stories such as this because it is not the message they choose to convey. The CFR "advises" what type of stories to run.
The only way the rest of the media would have jumped on this story is if the racial roles were reversed. It's sad to say it, but we all know it's true. Our media is a pathetic bias disgrace.
"BLACK MAN" assaults Tea Party member???
What are you trying to prove? You seem to be implying that Left leaning "Black men" are violent toward Tea Party protesters?
You've attended Tea Party's, and you're Black. So what do you think you're proving with this essay?? Are you "apologizing" for the Black guy because you happen to be Black also?? Do you think those "white folk" might think you're violent too, so you wrote this to show them that you're on their side?
Here's a White Man who attended a Tea Party/Palin/McCain rally and got roughed up and thrown out for shouting. Near the end of the clip you clearly see a "white man" sucker punch the "white protester" from behind. Yet does this prove in any way that Palin/Tea Party supporters are "viciously intolerant?"
So now that you've got this video clip, you can do an essay entitled; "White Man Assaults Leftest Protester at Tea Party/McCain Rally."
The fact is "violence" can break out at any time when two opposing ideological factions cross paths in the forum of a street protest. Each side [will of course] deny having provoked the violence.
For you to make it a "headlining point" that the man who assaulted the Tea Party guy was "Black", promotes a negative racial stereotype and taints your essay/story as bias and petty!!
p allen quoting me "BLACK MAN" assaults Tea Party member???" Unless he was a white, Asian, Indian or Hispanic guy with black paint on, he looked black to me allen. You may want to have your eyes checked. The guy is black.
p allen "hat are you trying to prove? You seem to be implying that Left leaning "Black men" are violent toward Tea Party protesters? "
You should know by now that I don't "try" to prove anything allen. I "do" prove them allen. The point I made is obvious,well at least to some it is. Your pals on the left have been panting a false picture of the tea party people as being an unruly mob made up of a bunch of racists that incite violence. We have yet to see example one "right wing tea party violence", your friends on the left says that the tea party is about. What I have documented over and over and over however is the leftwing violence and hatred by liberals towards people who don't support their point of view. Tell me allen, why did the black bush hater attack that tea party activist? My point is that the violence is being not by the right but by the left.
p allen "You've attended Tea Party's, and you're Black. So what do you think you're proving with this essay?? Are you "apologizing" for the Black guy because you happen to be Black also?? Do you think those "white folk" might think you're violent too, so you wrote this to show them that you're on their side?"
Your right allen, I've attended two tea parties, and I never had a reason to attack anyone either. The tea party folks made me feel right at home. According to liberals the Tea Parties are nothing more then a concentration gathering of the KKK. So why would I feel comfortable among the tea party folks yet the black guy in North Carolina felt he had assault a tea party member allen? Answer that if you will.
p allen "Here's a White Man who attended a Tea Party/Palin/McCain rally and got roughed up and thrown out for shouting. Near the end of the clip you clearly see a "white man" sucker punch the "white protester" from behind. Yet does this prove in any way that Palin/Tea Party supporters are "viciously intolerant?""
Ah, but a McCain Palin rally wasn't at tea party event allen. Also the race of the guy being thrown out doesn't fit the "racial" template by the left. Nice try however. In the clip the white protester was causing a scene and he got punched. In the video of the tea party event, the tea party folks were peacefully demonstrating and the black guy attacked for no valid reason.
p allen "The fact is "violence" can break out at any time when two opposing ideological factions cross paths in the forum of a street protest. Each side [will of course] deny having provoked the violence. "
Right allen and I'm sure you would be blowing this same smoke if the tea party person would have attacked the black guy first. Who do you think you' re kidding? lol
The first comment you would post is that the tea party racists attacked a black guy. You should know by now I know how the game works backwards and forward allen, come on.
p allen "For you to make it a "headlining point" that the man who assaulted the Tea Party guy was "Black", promotes a negative racial stereotype and taints your essay/story as bias and petty!!"
Don't make me laugh allen. Are you going to tell me that liberals and their allies in the media haven't cared a negative stereotype of the Tea Party activists being nothing more then a bunch of Brook Brother wearing, far right wing, KKK conservative racists? Are you kidding me? You know perfectly well why Rachael Maddow went after Rand Paul on the issue of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It was to use his libertarian views as a way to tar and feather Rand and the Tea Party as being a bunch of racists. Once again allen, you aren't fooling anyone here.
CB;"According to liberals the Tea Parties are nothing more then a concentration gathering of the KKK".
Some so-called "libruls" might say such a thing, but to categorize the entire group as being racist is wrong.
However, you can't deny that there are racist elements within the Tea Party. That's the reason why I question your aggrandizing of the fact that the man who perpetrated the assault was Black! That's exactly what the fringe elements of the Tea Party wants and needs!
Like THESE FOLKS. And HER. Or even THIS.
The few kooks that are part of the Tea Party want for you as a "minority" person to ignore, or pretend that they don't exist. Their overall mission doesn't include you any way. So, all you're doing is giving the Tea Party "racist fringe" fuel for their fire.
CB;"You know perfectly well why Rachael Maddow went after Rand Paul on the issue of the 1964 Civil Rights Act".
Maddow is a "LIBERAL" commentator and pundit. She was doing what any liberal commentator would have done. It just so happens she did a "VERY GOOD JOB" of attacking a political ideological position which she does not agree with.
It also [just so happens] that I agree with Maddows position. I like and agree with every provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Perhaps you don't, but then again, that's your prerogative.
p allen "Some so-called "libruls" might say such a thing, but to categorize the entire group as being racist is wrong. "
Finally some reason allen. I am somewhat impressed.
p allen "However, you can't deny that there are racist elements within the Tea Party. That's the reason why I question your aggrandizing of the fact that the man who perpetrated the assault was Black! That's exactly what the fringe elements of the Tea Party wants and needs!Like THESE FOLKS. And HER. Or even THIS.
I never said that there weren't. It is impossible to keep the fringe out of the tea party movement. It's not like there is an official screening process to weed out the racial wack jobs.You have to admit allen that your friends on the left painting EVERYBODY who is associated with the tea party as racist, when you know that isn't true.
p allen "The fact is "violence" can break out at any time when two opposing ideological factions cross paths in the forum of a street protest. Each side [will of course] deny having provoked the violence."
Just tell me when tea party activists committed violence allen.
p allen "Maddow is a "LIBERAL" commentator and pundit. She was doing what any liberal commentator would have done. It just so happens she did a "VERY GOOD JOB" of attacking a political ideological position which she does not agree with."
Yeah whatever allen lol. She attacked but it didn't work. Rand is still leading in the polls and Rachael has gone back to being a nobody on a distant second rate channel.
CB;"You have to admit allen that your friends on the left painting EVERYBODY who is associated with the tea party as racist".
To say "everybody" is disingenuous for you to think, or say so! Just as you might believe that "everybody" on the left thinks the Tea Party racist, is no different from those on the right who say that "everybody" on the left thinks it. Neither is true...
This would be considered a hate crime in some ways. A black man attacked a white protester, without provocation.
The liberal media would find some excuse as to why he attacked this person. "He was just having a bad day" or something like that.
If the rolls were reversed, the media and the law would indeed call it a hate crime. All crimes, regardless, are hate crimes.
Post a Comment
<< Home