White Nationalist Jamie Kelso was shown no love by the young people attending CPAC.
I've said on many occasions that racism knows no one ideology or political party. Some on the left however think otherwise. It is virtually impossible for any social or political movement or organization to screen out the racist and bigoted elements from their groups. This is a video from yesterday of a White Nationalist Jamie Kelso trying to recruit young people at CPAC.
The young people didn't want anything to do with this person, and in the end they ask that Kelso stop trying to affiliate with their causes and groups. Conservatives tend to denounce and distant themselves from the whack nuts who surround them. I attended a Tea Party two years ago in Baltimore. A guy brought and American flag that was upside down. The flying of the America flag upside down is a symbol distress. The people in attendance didn't like the guy's flag, and they asked him to stop waving it. This was an example of the Tea Party folks policing the fringe elements within the rally. Getting back to Jamie Kelso. I wish I could have confronted this "gentlemen", me and him would have had a very interesting and detailed debate to say the least. I've been told that Mr. Kelso is a supporter of Ron Paul. That really doesn't come as a shock to me. This just goes to show that conservatives have to not only focus on the external elements that threaten the movement and the country, but we also have to focus internally to make sure that people like Kelso don't undermine it and start to take hold of it like the cancer people like him represent.
The young people didn't want anything to do with this person, and in the end they ask that Kelso stop trying to affiliate with their causes and groups. Conservatives tend to denounce and distant themselves from the whack nuts who surround them. I attended a Tea Party two years ago in Baltimore. A guy brought and American flag that was upside down. The flying of the America flag upside down is a symbol distress. The people in attendance didn't like the guy's flag, and they asked him to stop waving it. This was an example of the Tea Party folks policing the fringe elements within the rally. Getting back to Jamie Kelso. I wish I could have confronted this "gentlemen", me and him would have had a very interesting and detailed debate to say the least. I've been told that Mr. Kelso is a supporter of Ron Paul. That really doesn't come as a shock to me. This just goes to show that conservatives have to not only focus on the external elements that threaten the movement and the country, but we also have to focus internally to make sure that people like Kelso don't undermine it and start to take hold of it like the cancer people like him represent.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 11:15 AM
14 Comments:
Around 7 and a half minutes, one of the people says Truman was a Klansman. I didn't know that, don't know if that is True but in general, I've said the same that the Democrats are the party that upheld Jim Crow laws, etc. etc. Kansas had, let's see, John Brown who I understand was a radical slave abolitionist back in Civil War days who did things even Abe Lincoln would not want associated with the Emancipation movement. But that is history.
Dang, Harry was Klan , Klan was also heavily anti-Catholic...so I agree with Alpha Conservative Male, you really can't break down Racists into Left or Right wing. They are extremists.
Sure this thread will be popular but that's all I have to say.
Hee-Hee! I love stupid people; they make me laugh.
Archie Bunker would be a lot more entertaining than this guy.
conservatives have to not only focus on the external elements that threaten the movement and the country, but we also have to focus internally to make sure that people like Kelso don't undermine it and start to take hold of it like the cancer people like him represent
I whole-heartedly agree.
I would only add that I think Kelso and his ilk are a tiny minority whereas the Left would have you think that his views are commonplace.
And to think, they unflinchingly give Woodrow Wilson a free pass. Go figure.
glad the conservatives told this human garbage to hit the road. Kelso and his filth need to get lost!
Hooray for those folks who shunned the racist idiot. Yet, one still has to question "why" these racist types are so hell bent on infiltrating right-wing political functions.
P. Anthony Allen-"Yet, one still has to question "why" these racist types are so hell bent on infiltrating right-wing political functions."
The question is why the majority of black America votes Democrat when the party had a history of its members with a shady past?
Segregationist such as Woodrow Wilson, Strom Thurmond, George Wallace, and Robert Byrd.
Or commits acts of taking away rights of American because of their ancestry? Franklin Roosevelt: sure, he he has taken the country out of the Depression, but he signed and executive order that interned thousands of Americans Japanese, German, and Italian ancestry without any rights.
Would you still vote for any one of these jokers?
p allen "Hooray for those folks who shunned the racist idiot. Yet, one still has to question "why" these racist types are so hell bent on infiltrating right-wing political functions"
Hooray indeed for people like those young folks who stand up to the extremists trying to hijack the conservative movement. Also, hooray for people like me who calls a spade a spade and report on it. However the shame on you goes to you allen and people like you who always turn a blind eye to the racist and anti Semitic extremists who fester within the progressive movement. I really didn't have to bring this story up, by me putting this out there I am actually giving ammo to the left to use again the right. I put the Kelso story out there because it was news worthy worth commenting on. How many liberal bloggers commented on the progessive Palm Springs gathering of those who called for Clarance Thomas to be lynched, strung up and sent back to the fields allen? I noticed you didn't condemn those remarks, you instantly went out and found links about the right instead. So you just once again proven my point allen. P
Anon;"The question is why the majority of black America votes Democrat when the party had a history of its members with a shady past?".
AMERICA has a history of it's member's with a "shady past." Moreover, Democrat and Republican ideology is much more different now than they were then... (pssst..Ronald Reagan was a Democrat at one time)
The majority of Blacks vote Democrat (now) because they don't vote Republican (any longer). The voting bloc trend began to change during the late 1950's, early 1960's. That's something you should know.
Since the Republican Party doesn't receive a large part (or all of) the Black vote, it has to make the lack of our vote an issue. It's nothing more than a "natural" reaction that you, or any one else would disqualify or even vilify a "voting bloc" that doesn't support you...
Riddle me this... With so much animosity against "Gays and Lesbians" from right-wingers, why would homosexuals want to involve themselves with the Republican Party?? There's plenty of room for them in the Democratic Party. Yet the GOProud and Log Cabin vote is hardly an issue for left-wingers.
Whatever your answer may be, just take it and apply it to why Blacks (or any other group for that matter) vote they way they do, and you'll have your answer.
CB;"However the shame on you goes to you allen and people like you who always turn a blind eye to the racist and anti Semitic extremists who fester within the progressive movement".
If there are, "racist and anti Semitic extremists who fester within the progressive movement", that rear their heads within a progressive movement, may they be DAMNED AND BURN IN HELL! (is that strong enough language for you?) Now, your next task is to come up a video of a Code Pink, AFL-CIO, UAW, AFFCE, The Ruckus Society, 350, Greenpeace, etc..., rally where the Council of Conservative Citizens, Minute Men, KKK, Skin heads, Nation of Islam or the Black Panther Party were in attendance. Take your time...
However, as I clearly pointed out in the Palm Springs "Clarence Thomas/Koch Brothers" video, the maker of the video posed prepared questions to "woo" or co-hearse a particular response. Simply put, he had a microphone, camera and a mission.
So, to "contrast" the substance and intent of the Jamie Kelso video with the Palms Springs video basically makes the Kelso video a planned and scripted event. Were the people in the video just a group of conservative young attendees"? Or were they chosen to make the comments they made???
p allen "The majority of Blacks vote Democrat (now) because they don't vote Republican (any longer). The voting bloc trend began to change during the late 1950's, early 1960's. That's something you should know. "
And the "logical" reason why most blacks vote Democrat is what exactly allen?a On a side not, have you ever wondered why turkeys look up in the sky when it rains and drown themselves in the process?
p allen "Since the Republican Party doesn't receive a large part (or all of) the Black vote, it has to make the lack of our vote an issue. It's nothing more than a "natural" reaction that you, or any one else would disqualify or even vilify a "voting bloc" that doesn't support you..."
If it was only that easy. The fact of the matter is that Republicans don't even need the majority of blacks voting for them in order to win elections, that has been proven. Even with that FACT being said, Republicans still reach out to blacks for some odd reason in an outreach effort. Since Democrats have roughly 85 to 90% of the black vote, why do democrats vilify and demean the 10 to 15% of blacks that vote Republican or align themselves with republicans?
p allen "Riddle me this... With so much animosity against "Gays and Lesbians" from right-wingers, why would homosexuals want to involve themselves with the Republican Party?? There's plenty of room for them in the Democratic Party. Yet the GOProud and Log Cabin vote is hardly an issue for left-wingers.
Your whole life has been a riddle and you still don't have a clue allen. This shouldn't be hard as usual. Most Republicans don't have a problem with gays and lesbians. The issue that is the sticking point if you want to call it that is about the definition of "marriage". The vast majority have no problem with same sex people having the same rights as married couples, but marriage has a pre defined definition and it wasn't the government who defined marriage. It's a matter of religious doctrine. Isn't it great that I am always here to throw the flag on you attempt a deception on a topic? Left wingers have tolerance for gays just like they do other minorities as "they know their role when it comes to voting", right allen ;-)
p allen "If there are, "racist and anti Semitic extremists who fester within the progressive movement", that rear their heads within a progressive movement, may they be DAMNED AND BURN IN HELL! (is that strong enough language for you?) "
Hey allen, don't say it for my account. It's whether you believe your own words. I condemn racists elements period. My track record is sound thank you very much.
p allen "Now, your next task is to come up a video of a Code Pink, AFL-CIO, UAW, AFFCE, The Ruckus Society, 350, Greenpeace, etc..., rally where the Council of Conservative Citizens, Minute Men, KKK, Skin heads, Nation of Islam or the Black Panther Party were in attendance. Take your time...
Here you go, have a good look.
This is just a sample of the anti semetism that has been on display at progressive rallies in San Francisco and Berkeley.
http://zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
Any questions?
"Alternet’s Racist Tirade Against Herman Cain: “Black Garbage Pail Kid,” "Monkey" Link
CB;"why do democrats vilify and demean the 10 to 15% of blacks that vote Republican or align themselves with republicans?".
Democrats do so because they can't understand why turkeys look up in the sky when it rains and drown themselves in the process.
CB;"This shouldn't be hard as usual. Most Republicans don't have a problem with gays and lesbians.".
It's "harder" than usual for you to tell the truth Tyrone....
Most "YOUNGER" GOP'ers are more open to Gay Rights according to a poll taken at CPAC. However, that doesn't equate to "MOST" Republican sentiments. "MOST" Republicans (when polled across the board) are by far against gays and lesbians serving in the military, marrying, receiving federal or state benefits, or teaching in public schools.
CB:"Isn't it great that I am always here to throw the flag on you attempt a deception on a topic?".
If you would only dare to use your own common sense instead of someone else's talking points, you would see who's really deceiving you. Only FIVE house Republicans voted to repeal DADT. Only EIGHT in the Senate voted for the repeal. If "MOST" were for Gay Rights, wouldn't "MOST" have voted for the repeal?
If "MOST" Republicans had no problems with Gay Rights Tyrone, wouldn't there be at least "ONE" openly Gay Republican politician in congress, or prominent on the national level? Even former Rep. Steve Gunderson (R-WI) was in the closet until he was outed by other Republicans.
What "MOST" Republicans say and do concerning Gay Rights is in direct conflict with what you claim "MOST" Republicans say and do. So who's really being deceived?
CB;"Any questions?.
Yeah... Where's the proof I asked for??
You gave me a link to anti-Israel, Anarchists, World Naked Bike Riders, Communist support group, and others, of what most people might call "Nutcase" fringe group protests. But what does that have to do with the Koch brothers protest???
When was the last time you went to a World Naked rally and a anti-Koch brothers rally broke out? Or a Green Peace gathering and a anti-Israel rally breaks out?
Post a Comment
<< Home