Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Progressive intolerance in the name of tolerance?

Liberalism and tolerance goes together like vampires and garlic. Progressives have been known to act in the hate filled manner they claim the right represents for decades. I discovered just how intolerant the left can be when Clarance Thomas was being confirmed by the U.S Senate for a seat on the Supreme Court. I didn't even know who the man was, but one thing that stood out during the process was how the left racially attacked him for no good reason. They called him an Uncle Tom, said that he wasn't black, he was an Oreo etc. The words he was called didn't make sense to me back then. I asked those who attacked this man, why did they refer to him as a "trader to his race". Of course, they couldn't answer that question. As I became more politically active, my thoughts about the left became more clear that these people who champion themselves as the advocates for tolerance, compassion and diversity are anything but what they claim. This is how liberals portrayed Joseph Lieberman  when he ran for re election against fellow liberal Ned Lemont in 2006. Joe was under attack due to his support of the Iraq War and support of George Bush on the issue. So a supporter of Lamont doctored a photo of Lieberman (in black face) standing next to Bill Clinton.



Of course liberals just dismissed this, because they just hid behind the lame excuse that they couldn't be racist or bigoted due to them being liberals.  When black conservative Ken Blackwell ran for Governor of Ohio, the left didn't take too kindly to that.


 When Michael Steele ran for Governor here in Maryland,  the left portrayed him as a "sambo", "minstrel". When he became the first black chairman of the Republican National Committee, the left wasn't interested in his historic achievement as a black man.


 As you can see, there is a clear pattern to the left's intolerance to those who are not white and are conservative or even moderate like in the case of Joe Lieberman. Frankly, I didn't even come close to remotely scratching the surface. I will however present one more person that the left has an issue with. She's a black woman who in the left's eye doesn't know here role so to speak. Glo Smith is running for congress in the Florida 5th congressional district. One would think that elections should be won or lost on the issues. A person's skin color shouldn't be an issue, well if that candidate isn't white and is conservative of course the left is going to make it an issue every time. This is a picture of Glo Smith speaking at one of her political events
This is how the left portrayed Ms. Glo as a black female for daring to have diverse points of views that aren't shared by liberals.


 Now of course all liberals aren't racially hard wired like this, but the ones who aren't are fraudulent, when it comes to pointing their fingers at the right and shouting racism. Those on the left who truly embrace diversity including ideological diversity needs to ask themselves why other liberals feel that minorities are suppose to embrace their views exclusively or else. As a conservative who is black, I welcome other blacks who chose to be conservatives, liberals, moderates, democrats, republicans, libertarians, green party or constitutional party members or simply chose to be unaffiliated. Why do some liberals act out in a racial manner? Do they realize that every time they racially attack blacks for doing nothing more then opposing them on policies, they are making themselves out to be the real racists they claim the right is? I remember some on the left calling Condi Rice an "Aunt Jemimah". I've asked liberals who called her this how does a a woman who was a child prodigy, who holds a Doctorate Degree, speaks 3 languages fluently,  plays classical piano, was the former Secretary of State and National Security Adviser and is a college professor be compared to a fictional maid like black woman on a bottle of syrup. As you may have guessed, I have yet to get an answer.

Wednesday, July 02, 2014

White Privilege and the indoctrination of American kids.



 I've been hearing this buzz term for awhile now. What exactly is "white privilege"? I suppose liberals would say that white privilege is something about whites in America who are privileged to have certain advantages because of the color of their skin. Well if that's the case, then from a progressive stand point naturally they are going to believe the flip side of that claim, that minorities are the inherit victims of "white privilege". As with progressive logic, minorities and blacks will always be life's victims due to whites somehow having it better then them. Of course that line of thinking is beyond stupid and irrational.  Then again, if you are a progressive and your job is to convince blacks that their life sucking isn't their fault, then this is a perfect excuse to use. I was driving yesterday here in Baltimore, and I pulled up to an intersection. A homeless guy was walking the cement walkway divider looking for motorists to give him change. The guy was white. As I observed this guy asking for change I thought if white privilege is real, why is this guy homeless and begging for change? I've seen other homeless people who are white and are homeless, and that question never escapes me. On the flip side, there are blacks in this country who are very well off financially and in some cases are millionaires and even billionaires. So how did that happen? Dr Dre the rapper just recently sold his Beats Audio headphone company to Apple for I believe two billion dollars. Is that a sample of "black privilege"? What about Oprah who is considered the most powerful woman in media, well Oprah is black. Now I know some will say that I am naming entertainers, but my point is that the myth of white privilege is just that, a myth. Tell that to liberals though, and they will swear up and down that your are either a racist or out of touch  Liberals are so engulfed into this insanity, they even have an annual "white privilege conference" to talk about how to combat "white privilege" in America. h/t to progressives today.com for shedding a light on how liberals are indoctrinating kids to believe such insanity.



It has been said the liberalism is a mental disorder. There is little doubt that it is.  This just shows that liberals have no idea what real racism is. Some of these kooks actually believe they are inherently racists simply for being born white. That is as mental as thinking that a person is destined to be drug user, dealer or criminal, because he was born black. Of course this is obvious brainwashing of kids. No wonder so many of them are growing up to be such mind numbed robots voided of being able to use analytical thinking. They are being programmed at very young ages to think this dribble as witnessed in at the White Privilege Conference. If I was to have brought up this topic, liberals would have just claimed I was making this stuff up, well let them argue with the facts now.This is obviously real and is most definitely happening. It's foolishness like this is a reason why the federal "Common Core" educational curriculum has been rejected by so many school systems via the backlash of parents from across the country, because they reject the social justice ideological BS which is the framework of it. So much for the days when educators were in trusted to just teach the children about reading, writing and math and science. The White Privilege Conference just verifies what I said about how liberals see blacks as being poor, pathetic down trodden victims. It's not their fault for anything. It's the fault of "the man". This type of thinking is also known as "White Guilt". If these ding bat liberals feel so bad for being born white, they can always jump off the nearest overpass and call it a day. Nah, no such luck. I've been called many derogatory names by the left, because I see through their warped minded  insanity thus never seeing myself as a victim of "white privilege", because I never was. I would love for an "intelligent" liberal to tell me how I was and am. Good luck in that happening I now. While other countries are teaching their children advanced mathematics and science, kids in the United States are being brainwashed about "social justice" and white guilt. Gee, I wonder what nation is economically going to be better off in the long run? (sarcasm). I came across a beautiful video by a lady named Stacey On The Right in response to the 2014 White Privilege aka White Guilt Conference that just ended a few weeks ago. She nailed it perfectly.



Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Hispanics aren't nothing like blacks politically.

White liberals are some very stupid people. I'm not saying this, because I am opposed to just about everything they stand for. I'm saying this, because it's the truth. These people have this warped concept of how the world should be, and they are determined to make it so. They also have to tendency to think that things will work out according to their way of thinking, and that will lead to their down fall. There is no denying that most blacks follow the lead of white progressives hook line and sinker. They are for the most part the ultimate useful idiots. It is what it is.

They have been indoctrinated or trained to believe that white liberals are somehow "not white" yet white conservatives are and that makes them all racists because of it.

I never said liberal logic had to make sense. White liberals know they have to vast bulk of the "black vote", and they never have to fear blacks becoming a political dominating force that will rise up and take away their power. Hispanics on the other hand are a different story entirely. Hispanics in this country both legal and illegal aren't like blacks. For one thing, Hispanics don't abort off their own like blacks do thus their population will continue to grow. Another thing and probably the most important thing is that Hispanics are very politically aware as to their influence in politics by both parties. Since blacks are deemed owned or property by the Democratic Party exclusively, they really do not have any political capital. The Democratic Party knows that blacks will never leave them no matter what which means that the party knows they do not have to do anything for them so they can be taking for granted. I've been listening to some of the militant Hispanic leaders over the years from groups like CASA, and their agenda is one that could ultimately make white liberals a minority within the Democratic Party which I wouldn't really wouldn't care if it happened. There are Hispanic Democrats and leaders who are openly against white Democrats winning congressional seats in their districts. As their population continues to grow this will start to be a problem for white Democrats aka "anglos". For example, In New Mexico running for state delegate, Frank Otero sought the help of State Representative Miguel Garcia who is a Hispanic Democrat in Albuquerque. Miguel decided to help Mr. Otero. So Miguel sent out an email to other Democratic House, Senate and other elected Officials.. The Gracia email stated 

" A minority of unsuspecting Democratic leaders are supporting the Democratic ANGLO newcomer opponents in Andrews and Frank's primary races".

So I guess this was a case of a racist Hispanic Democrat attacking white Democrats., gee go figure. I know some will claim this was just an isolated issue, but I know it's not. Liberals think they will control the Hispanic vote like they do the black vote. They are dreaming if they think that will be the case.






Thursday, June 12, 2014

The day the nut made perfect sense.

Hell has frozen over on MSNBC. Well it has for Chris Matthews. Following the massive political shock wave that was experienced Tuesday night as Tea Party candidate David Brat soundly defeated the House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in the Virginia Republican Congressional Primary. Mr' Brat's stunning upset is one thing, but how he was able to beat Eric Cantor so badly has all the political pundits and commentators complexed in trying to find a logical answer to what happened Tuesday Night. One person I would not have ever expected to even come close to getting it right was Chris Matthews. On something called the Ronan Farrow Daily show on MSNBC, himself. Chris and  Chuck Todd were discussing Mr Brat's win, and Chris noted that Mr. Brat is an economics professor and has a grasp on how to articulate his beliefs and that he is more then capable of defending his positions on his or any other show. Well those comments of course made Farrow and Todd laugh in sarcasm. To them and many other liberals, the Tea Party is nothing more then a movement of white, racist, backwoods intellectual knuckledragging, redneck hicks. I never thought I would say this, but to Chris's credit he stated  the stereotypes that his fellow liberals have placed on the Tea Party is inaccurate. He further went on to state that liberals should stop acting like intellectual snobs. I don't know, maybe someone spiked Chris's coffee or something or he was off his meds, but for one brief moment, Chris Matthews was the smartest person in the room on MSNBC. The idea that Brat is a Tea Party person and is college educated is a shock to liberals in the first place but for for him to also be a professor just can't gel with their sense of reality of those who oppose them.



 How Dave beat Eric so badly is of no surprise to some myself. Eric Cantor has been a supporter of amnesty for awhile. I believe what opened up the flood gates in opposition to Cantor in his district was his constituents watching the flood of teenage illegal aliens into the country over the past few weeks. It's one thing for a candidate to talk about an issue, but when they can visualize it, they become more connected to it. Cantor simply had no way of defending his position on amnesty against the back drop of the children and teenage illegal alien invasion that is currently happening.



Thursday, May 29, 2014

Was it racist or was it the truth that liberals didn't want to hear?

If a white person said that he or she wouldn't go into a bad neighborhood, because African Americans lived there, would that be considered a racist thing to have said? If a Republican, famous conservative or Tea Party candidate ever said that, oh hells bells would there be a problem. Nice that Democrats aren't racist (because they said so) they don't have to worry about such comments being said. I'm just curious however, would that statement be racist? Well a white female legislator in New Cassel New York named Ellen Birmbaum said  about a neighborhood next tot  the Yes We Can Community Center "This is a bad neighborhood because African Americans live there. Very few people would want to live there." Oh by the way, Ms Birmbaum is a Democrat. Yes, you read right, she isn't a Tea Party, Republican nor conservative, I may have overlooked that party. Anyways, her comments didn't sit very well with black Democrats, gee I wonder why? Is Democratic legislator Ellen Birmbaum a racist? Clearly there are those in her party who believe she is, and they want her to resign for her remarks. It would be so easy to hang Ms Birnbaum out as a symbol of Democratic racism, but I believe there was truth to what she said. So I am kind of slit on this one. It was a truth that black and white progressives chose to ignore, yet attack conservatives for pointing the obvious out. The seedy, crime infested problems in the inner cities are in mainly black neighborhoods. All you have do is pick a city, Baltimore Newark New Jersey, New Jersey City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Richmond, Oakland, South Central Los Angeles, Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, Flint Michigan etc etc etc. The unspoken rule is to never speak out loud what the problem is and more importantly who are the ones who are causing those areas to be urban war zones. For all the talk that Democrats spew about diversity, white liberals would not dare step foot into a black or mostly black impoverished neighborhood unless they are politicians going to a black church during an election year. The neighborhood she was in wasn't bad, because blacks lived there. It was bad, because of the type of blacks who lived there. Poverty is a major reason for why these neighborhoods look likes something out of a post apocalyptic Mad Max movie. Blacks who live in these impoverish crime infested neighborhoods do so mostly by necessity and not by desire. Poverty breeds crime, and criminals live in impoverished neighborhoods. Blacks with a good education tend not to live in poverty. Democratic progressives run these cities exclusively, no Tea Party, conservatives, no Republicans  zero, ziltch, nada. What Ms Birnbaum witnessed and commented on is the aftermath of her political party not addressing what caused those neighborhoods not to be safe and economically sound in the first place. At the end of the day, Democratic politicians and their subservients saying to blacks in these crime gripped ghettos, vote for us, because the GOP and Tea Party are racist is such a deception to their constituents they claim to support. It just takes attention away for another few more years of having to address the real problems facing blacks. I could take Ms Birnbaum through parts of  Baltimore that would have her peeing in her pants, and that's just in the day time. Funny how the mystical Democratic progressive utopias are few and far between for blacks, and you better not say out loud that or you might be called a racist for doing so.



Monday, May 26, 2014

The cost of freedom is sometimes paid for wih blood.

Remember those who have paid that ultimate price.


Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Condi Rice not authentic enough to be a role model to blacks in the ghettos?

This story is just tempting to ignore. I really like Democratic strategist Bob Beckel. He reminds me so much of Democratic strategist James Carville. Both have a known tendency to shot their mouths off first and think second. Personality wise, I like Carville better though. Beckel has been a one man self destructing wrecking crew since joining Fox News and becoming a panelist on the the show "The Five". Bob's latest trip down the rabbit hole came, when he made a comment yesterday that was absolute stupid. It was a comment that I though gee if a conservative would have made the exact verbatim comment about Obama, the left would have gone nuclear times ten in outrage demanding he or she be fired or dealt with. I'm going to build up to it. Here's a question. Should Barack Hussein Obama be looked up to by blacks? Some would say yes. Forget his lack of positive accomplishments for a second. He is the first bi racial passed off as black president. That is something to be noted. Now here's another question, should it matter that Barack Hussein Obama never lived in the ghetto? He grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii which are not exactly Baltimore, Detroit, Cleveland etc. By him not growing up in "the hood" Obama lacked "street cred". He was seen by most to be in a different category of black persona then lets say the likes of Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton who both also ran for President. Because of Obama's upbringing and education, he was seen as "acceptable" or as Joe Biden "mainstream and clean".  He was referred to as "Obama the Magic Negro" by the editor of the LA Times David Ehrenstein who is a black liberal. Democratic Senate Majority Leader praised Obama for not having a "Negro Dialect".unless he wanted to have one (while speaking to blacks).



On a side note, Mr None Negro Dialect Barack Obama criticized Trent Lott for saying some kind words during Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party but Barack had no problem accepting the apology from Harry Reid nor raising money for the late Klansman Robert Byrd of West Virginia. Back to Bob. Bob claimed that blacks should not look up to Condi Rice, because she didn't grow up in the ghetto.




Since Obama never lived in the slums or ghettos, I would have to say using Bob Beckel's template for what makes for a good black role model for people who live in the ghetto, Barrack Obama would have to be disqualified as well right? Funny I know, if Bob was asked that question, he would spin left and right to try and make an exception for Obama, that's not even in question. I'm not a big fan of Condi Rice ideology wise, she's too progressive for my taste, however I do acknowledge her accomplishments and her life's story from being from being born into a family of sharecroppers, becoming a child prodigy, becoming the first black female Secretary of State and first black National Security Advisor who is also an accomplished pianist who can also speak multiple languages.. Condi didn't grow up in the hood or ghetto like Beckel said, but she grew up in the era of Jim Crow n the segregated south where racism was real. It wasn't no progressive political smear back then, it was the real thing.  Beckel needs to walk in the shoes of Condi to know what makes a true role model.