Friday, March 27, 2015

If a white person orders their Starbucks Coffee with sugar and cream, does that make them a racist?

 I love how the left always accuses conservatives of throwing their values in everybody's face even though they never do. It's usually the other way around. At every conceivable turn, liberals hop onto to their lopsided soap box and try to browbeat everybody into submission in order for them to embrace what they support such as global warming or gay marriage. These people in their warped, self illusion minds have crowned themselves as being the only views that are suppose to matter in society and we all must conform or else. As for me, I just laugh in their face with amusement. I remember when the left was fit to be tied over the views of the founders of Chic-Fil-A in regards to their position in supporting traditional marriage. The company itself didn't have a position on gay marriage it was the founders and their family.  Chic-Fil-A didn't support traditional marriage as apart of it's business.They didn't use their business to try and advance their social beliefs. Now lets talk Starbucks Coffee shops or as I like to call them "$tarsmucks" on the other hand. The CEO of $tarsmucks Howard Schultz is a radical liberal. As CEO of $tarsmucks, he has blurred the lines between what are his personal beliefs and what are proper business practices. For example, $tarsmucks launched a social something last week asking their baristas to engage their customers on the issue of "race and racism"

I'm pretty much an expert at calling out people's hypocrisy, and I wish I could ask Howard Schultz some questions about racism and race and $tarsmucks.

1. What is the percentage of minorities who work in stores, middle and upper management in the $tarsmucks organization

That actually would be the only question I would ask Howard Schultz, then I would sit down put my feet on his desk smile and wait patently for his answer. If anything that I know about liberals is that they are fake. Diversity Inc every year releases it's annual list of the most racially diverse companies in America known as it's top 50 list. Do you want to take a guess as to what company wasn't on the list for having a strong racially diverse workforce? It was kind of a no brainer I know. $tarsmucks didn't make the list. In typical progressive fashion, they are always lecturing or wanting to lecture others about a problem or perceived problem without first lecturing to themselves about it.Maybe just maybe, Howard Schultz should have a talk in the mirror or at least to his human resources department about race, hell they can all sit down with those $tarsmuck coffee cups that says "race together" and have a hard long talk about the racial makeup of their own company instead of asking their baristass (who are overwhelmingly white) to harass their customers on the issue of race and racism.This social experiment lasted a week before it was cancelled or "concluded". I guess who would have ever thought it that people only care about buying coffee when they go into a coffee store. Considering how pricey a cup of $tarsmucks coffee is, I suppose customers realized that talk is cheap not the coffee so there was no real value in talking to the average early twenty something year old white barista about something they frankly have no idea or concept about personally

Friday, March 13, 2015

The blood of two police officers shot in front of the Ferguson Police Department rest solely on his hands.

Attorney General Eric Holder better get a stronger scrub brush, because he's going to need it. Again he has found a way to have the blood of police officers on his hands. As you all have probably heard by now, two Police Officers were shot and nearly killed in an assassination attempt outside of the Ferguson Police Department a little after midnight Thursday. There is no debating this as to who is responsible. Yes the thug is the one who tried to assassinate who he or she thought were Ferguson Police officers, but he or she acted based on the actions of Eric Holder's bogus report that smeared the Ferguson Police Department as having deed seeded racial problems, yet it doesn't. I'll get back to that in a moment, but I want to bring attention to a very important fact that can not be ignored. The shooting death by former officer Darren Wilson was not only justified on the grounds of self defense against Saint Michael Brown, but even Eric Holder's own justice department couldn't find any evidence that Darren Wilson violated the civil rights of Saint Michael, thus
Officer Wilson was cleared in their own probe and no charges were brought!

So now comes the ten million dollar question folks. Since Officer Wilson was cleared by Eric Holder's own Justice Department,

 "Why did Eric Holder feel  it was necessary to conduct an investigation into the Ferguson Police Department" when his own Justice Department's investigation into the Saint Michael shooting found no racial attributes regarding the shooting"?

People in Ferguson got all racially ginned up again based on the report that was released by Eric Holder's Justice Department into the Ferguson Police Department in which they claim the department had deep seeded racial issues that needed to be addressed. As for those issues.  The investigation turned up TWO racist emails that were sent several years ago by Ferguson Police Officers. From how the Justice Department report described the report, one would think that David Duke's brother was running the place, but that wasn't the case.

  Most of the people who were fired over this JD's report were members of the Ferguson City Government and NOT  the Ferguson Police Department.!!

So because of this highly publicized report  which didn't show any wide spread systemic racial issues with in the FPD but was presented as if  it did,  black protesters got emotionally worked up into a frenzy and decided to protest outside the Ferguson Police Department and one of those protesters based on that report decided he was going to try and kill some Ferguson Police Officers. That's pretty much sums it up. The ironic aspect in this shooting is that the two officers who were shot weren't even Ferguson Police Officers. One officer was from Saint Louis County and the other was from the Webster Grove Police Department, but I suppose that doesn't matter much to those who "think" with blinded rage, a cop is a cop and cops deserve to be shot according to their mindset.

Eric Holder is s suppose to be the nations top cop as the Attorney General, but I truly have to wonder who's side is he really on. More often then not, he seems to be on the side of the very protesters who are targeting the police officers across the country. The Ferguson Police Chief had to become a scrafical lamb for the blood thirsty mob and was forced to resign, even though he didn't have anything to do with the death of Saint Michael Brown. I guess that's social justice on display.The Perception of addressing the problem is more important then actually addressing it I suppose.

Saturday, March 07, 2015

Were the remakrs by Dr Carson a potential 2016 death blow? If so then why?

Looks like Dr Ben Carson has had a rough week. For the life of me, I can't really figure out why this big firestorm has errupted. I mean his comments he made on CNN about believing that homosexuality is a choice based on how straight men go to prison and come out gay was his opinion. I don't really see where the "great controversy  is in what he said? People on both the left and sadly even the right are attacking him, but was what he said factually inaccurate? The 2016 Presidential campaign season has just begun, yet some are saying that Dr Carson has already ruined his chances to try and win the GOP nomination. Surprisingly some on the right are saying the same thing but why? Sometimes conservatives have a tendency to inflict dumb dumb wounds on themselves. They always wonder how the GOP establishment candidates always seem to win the nomination for the presidency, it's really simple. They stick by their candidates no matter what. With conservatives, it's hee woo throw them overboard at the slightest misstep. With Carson's comment, there really wasn't even a misstep. When Jeb Bush wins the GOP nomination, you'll know how it happened.

Saturday, February 21, 2015

Stupid is what stupid does? Or is it Stupid says what stupid represents?

The definition of the word "naive" is a person showing "a lack of wisdom, experience or judgement". Obama has proven himself to be a key illustration of the word on many issues especially as it pertains to foreign policy and the threat posed by Islamic Extremists. When it comes to the issue of Islamic Extremism, Obama and his world travelers who share his warped ideology on the subject are ideologically senile. They remind me so much of the cartoon Mr. Magoo with him trying to pet a mad dog while seeing it as fuzzy cute kitten.
That's liberal for you, people who see the world for how they wish it to be but not how it is. The comments by the State Department spokeswoman Maria Harf have made her famous for all the wrong reasons. More importantly, her comments underscores just how Obama and his inner circle truly are out of touch and don't see Islamic terrorism and fundamentalism in the same light as must Americans and even the world for that matter. Last week on the Chris Matthews Show on Lean Progressive MSNBC, Marie Harf of the State Department said that America can't "kill their way out" in defeating Islamic Extremists and that the way to defeating Islamic Extremism was with "job training" and "jobs" and helping people start businesses.

When I first heard Ms Harf's comments, my face froze with utter shock at how stupid that sounded, but then I remembered who her boss is and I just sighed. Dear Leader would rather be water boarded then to ever mention the words "Islamic Extremism, Extremists, Terrorism or Terrorists" in the same breath. Like I've always said, stupidity and ignorance are "party affiliation neutral. I remember when George Bush used the term "The War On Terror". What many people including conservatives didn't realize that Bush never injected the word "Islamic" in between the  words On and Terror. So Bush was really no different in how he addressed Islam and white washing it in it's role in terrorism. Now as for Ms Harf, she represents the State Department of the current administration, which is Obama's. Her comments about the "root causes" of why 17 year olds (FYI the vast majority of Islamic Terrorists are much older then 17) are picking up AK-47's is utterly absurd. It's not, because they don' have their own businesses, jobs etc.  Liberals like Ms Harf, Obama etc are intellectually incapable of seeing the true "root cause" for why Islamic Extremists exist. The answer is obvious to any non progressive minded person.

It's the Islamic Imams who are BRAINWASHING people into becoming Islamic Terrorists. not the lack of jobs, or job training.

Nobody in their "right mind" wakes up one day and say "I'm bored, I think I will become an Islamic Jihadist instead of playing my Playstation. Again, only a progressive minded person could not see the true "root cause" of how Jihadists are born.

Does anyone think that Imams like Abu Hamza recruited followers by promising them jobs and their own business?

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Who will stand up to ISIS?

If I hear the words Allah Akbar one more time in a connection with crazed  Muslims yelling that phrase while committing yet another terrorist attack, I am going to scream! ISIS just released a video of them marching 21 Egyptians Coptic Christians to ultimately behead them. Our limp wristed leader of the free world can care less that these horrific acts are being committed against Christians, even though he claims to be one. Obama only ever speaks out is when Islam is criticized, parish the thought. Let's see, Islam being criticized or people being beheaded, set on fire or killed in general by Muslims, gee, what's worse? Obama once referred to ISIS has the "Junior Varsity" team, Well it definitely looks like ISIS didn't get that message. Liberals referred to George Bush as a "reckless cowboy". Well as Islamic fanatics running wild in the Middle East and terrorizing Europe, were is the cowboys to come in and save the day? That role sure isn't reserved for Dear Leader Obama. I truly wish our country had a president who actually had some testicles to fight this evil. Unfortunately we were given a pitiful Socialist Community Organizer instead. Obama once called ISIS a "death cult". Well this supposed cult isn't killing off themselves like the followers of the Heaven Gate Cult or the followers of Jim Jones did, this so called death cult is on the march killing everybody who doesn't submit. Yeah those "airstrikes" truly have ISIS on the run. (sarcasm)

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Why is Obama such a staunch defender of Islam?

No other president in the history of the United States has been the biggest supporter and defender of Christianity oops I meant Islam then Barack Obama. People on the right have been telling me for years that Obama is a radical Islam sympathizer, I never really paid it much attention. I just thought of him a fake Christian who attended a cult for 20 years with the racist Jemimah Wright as his "spiritual" mentor. However, my thoughts on the so called Christian Barack Obama are changing or as the left said about Obama on the issue of gay marriage "evolving". At the National Prayer Breakfast, the so called Christian took the chance to attack Christianity by claiming that many atrocities were also committed in the name of Christianity just like Islam and that Christians don't have the moral authority to single out Islam for the violence being committed around the global

As Christians are being slaughtered in parts of Africa and the Middle East at the hands of ISIS, Al Queda etc, Obama has remained pretty much silent as these brutal atrocities continue. Obama on the other hand wasted zero time in coming out in trying to defuse the anger many people felt over the Islamist attack on the French Satire Newspaper Charlie Hesbo. I don't believe I've ever heard of nor read a story of Christians attacking anyone due to that person mocking or disrespecting a symbol of Christ. That is the true moral equivalence that can not be drawn by Obama nor anyone else on the left. What Obama and progressives can't admit is that there is no Christian, Jewish, Hindu nor Buddhist versions of ISIS, Al Qeada, Hesbola, Islamic Jihad, Boko Haram etc. I don't know where did Obama get the notion that Christianity was responsible for slavery in the Untied States. Anyone who studied U.S History and the era of slavery knows that slaves were used for cheap labor. As for Jim Crow, again I don't know how this fool thought that Jim Crow was somethingng that was created out of religion by Christians. This is the reason why Christians have responded so negatively to what Obama has said. It's because there is no factual basis for any of it. The more Obama tries to defend Islam, the more he makes an utter fool out of himself. I remember when Obama claimed that the United States "we are no long a Christian nation.".

yet the MAJORITY of  Americans still identify themselves as Christian. This just goes to show how completely out of touch Obama is.  To go further he claimed at the National Prayer Breakfast that Islam was "our" religion. Of course the national media didn't dare ask him what he meant by that. They have simply gone after in trying to discredit those who heard him said it. Is Obama truly a Muslim who can't help himself in defending his true faith when the circumstances demand it?

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Michelle Obama: We must teach young blacks to vote Democrat "no matter who's on the ballot"

I''ve noticed how when black democrats talk negative about the Republican Party, they can give an example of how the Democratic Party has benefited  the black working class. Myself along with other blacks who are either conservative or members of the GOP have been called "sellouts" "Uncle Toms" etc for not being loyal to the Democratic Party like they are. My questions to them has yet to be answered however.  Why should we support the Democratic Party and it's liberal policies? When I point to black poverty, illiteracy, drug addiction, black on black crime etc, I can't point a finger at the Republican Party for the creation nor continuation of these problems, because the Republican Party doesn't have any elected officials in the areas where these problems are occurring in black communities across the country. Democrats are mayors and council members in these areas. The truth is a you know what, and people like Michelle Obama doesn't want young black people to become critical thinkers and figure out the obvious. Monday on the black entertainment channel TV One Michelle Obama told host Roland Martin

Odd how liberals especially black ones call black conservatives or Republicans "House Negroes" considering that Michelle Obama is essentially saying that young blacks should be field Negros" to the Democratic Party. I've always said that I do not care if blacks want to be Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Green Party, Libertarian, Constitutional Party etc. That's the way it should be. Individual blacks supporting the party that best represents their interests. I've been told by white and black Democratic liberals that I somehow vote against my interests.  When I ask them what exactly are my interests that I am voting against, they can never seem to name one, surprise, surprise. For liberal Democrats to think that blacks should mindlessly vote a party ticket just because speaks volumes about how they truly see blacks as people. Whatever happened to the days when a political party had to actually "earn" a person's vote? Democrats have long taken the votes of blacks for granted, and Michelle just proved it yet again.