The losers of the CNBC debate
CNBC has had record low rating for a long time now. The same goes for it's sister network MSNBC. The wizards of smart who once owned MSNBC and CNBC General Electric never figured out the simple concept that people just want unbiased news, and the current owners Comcast hasn't learned that lesson either, so viewers have spoken by tuning both of them out. The CNBC debate could have been a memorable and informative debate for all the right reasons, but the progressive hack/ news director of CNBC decided it was more important to have Democratic activists Carl Quintanilla, Becky Quick, John Harwood to be the so called moderators of a Republican Debate instead. There are two people who for some crazy reason still work for CNBC who would have been perfect moderators for that the debate but weren't, because the debate would have been a true one if they were. Reince Priebuss should have demanded that Larry Kudlow and Rick Sentelli have been the moderators. If it was me, it would have been a no brainer to have done that. The progressive bias of the NBC family is well documented.. This is a video I created back in 2009 when, the panelists on MSNBC reported on "white people" showing up at an Obama health care rally with guns strapped to their waste. Yeah about that.
We can't forget this little nugget from MSNBC's Ed Schultz in which he tried to imply that Rick Perry was a racist during his 2012 run.. Ed selectively cut off a point in Rick's speech in which he was referring to the national debt as being a big black cloud, again yeah about that. It's bias like this it's no wonder why CNBC was the biggest loser of their own debate.