Herman Cain is stirring up Cain for the political establishment.
After his surprise first place win the recent Florida Straw Poll, Herman Cain has now magically appeared on the national radar. I wrote when Cain first announced he was running for the Republican nomination that he better be careful in his quest. Progressives will do anything and everything possible to derail Herman Cain from gaining any momentum as a serious presidential candidate for one reason. He's black. I kind of sound like a progressive saying that, but we all know it's true. Progressives have spent too much time and effort over the decades to create a false premise that the Republican Party is the party of racism. It only stands to reason that if Herman Cain wins the GOP nomination, that illusion they worked so hard to create and enforce will have been destroyed. Blacks have been brainwashed for over forty years by the Democratic party and their black progressive allies about what the Republican Party platform is about. To blacks, they have been spoon feed such nonsense such as the Republicans want to return blacks to slavery and reestablish the era of Jim Crow etc. Herman Cain was on the CNN Wolf Blitzer show the other day talking about how" blacks have been brainwashed" to distrust the GOP and believe that they are the party of racism.
For ninety percent of blacks to vote Democratic without no clear and valid reason why over and over again doesn't spell logic to me. Last week, I heard the comments of Morgan Freeman saying that the Tea Party is made up of racists. Morgan is a classic case of a person being an ignorant fool, because he like many blacks "never seem to have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what they regurgitate. Blacks who call the tea party racist never even been to one, that includes Morgan Freeman.
Maybe Morgan is still suck in the mindset of his role in the movie Driving Miss Daisy or something. I did a youtube video last year right after the GOP blowout in the mid term elections. In the elections Allen West, Tim Scott, Marco Rubio won their races.Nikki Haley won the Governer's race in South Carolina. I put out the question that if the tea party and the GOP is racist, how come racists voted for blacks, Hispanics and an American of Indian descent to represent them.
Brainwashing can't compete with cold hard facts. When people can't defend their claims about the Tea Party or Republicans being racists, they have no legitimate argument. Using the claims that the GOP is a racist party by the left, Michael Steele should have never been chosen as the Chairman of the Republican National Committee right? Would a black man be chosen to head up the Klu Klux Klan? The reason why blacks and progressives keep making everything about race is, because that is all that has been embedded into their brains to begin with. I know Herman Cain has been called an Uncle Tom, House Nigger, Simble Sambo, Token etc. He's been called and will continue to be called these names by the people on the left who claim to be about racial diversity. Notice however that it's the conservatives (the ones' progressives say are the racists ones) who are the ones "defending black and other minorities" who are conservatives. The same way progressives claimed that the "racist" GOP was trying to "copy" Obama with selecting Michael Steele as GOP Committee Chairman, they will definitely double down on the claim with Herman Cain. If the GOP is racist, why would they want to copy Obama? Don't try to figure it out. Brainwashing isn't suppose to make sense in the real world just to progressives.
For ninety percent of blacks to vote Democratic without no clear and valid reason why over and over again doesn't spell logic to me. Last week, I heard the comments of Morgan Freeman saying that the Tea Party is made up of racists. Morgan is a classic case of a person being an ignorant fool, because he like many blacks "never seem to have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what they regurgitate. Blacks who call the tea party racist never even been to one, that includes Morgan Freeman.
Maybe Morgan is still suck in the mindset of his role in the movie Driving Miss Daisy or something. I did a youtube video last year right after the GOP blowout in the mid term elections. In the elections Allen West, Tim Scott, Marco Rubio won their races.Nikki Haley won the Governer's race in South Carolina. I put out the question that if the tea party and the GOP is racist, how come racists voted for blacks, Hispanics and an American of Indian descent to represent them.
Brainwashing can't compete with cold hard facts. When people can't defend their claims about the Tea Party or Republicans being racists, they have no legitimate argument. Using the claims that the GOP is a racist party by the left, Michael Steele should have never been chosen as the Chairman of the Republican National Committee right? Would a black man be chosen to head up the Klu Klux Klan? The reason why blacks and progressives keep making everything about race is, because that is all that has been embedded into their brains to begin with. I know Herman Cain has been called an Uncle Tom, House Nigger, Simble Sambo, Token etc. He's been called and will continue to be called these names by the people on the left who claim to be about racial diversity. Notice however that it's the conservatives (the ones' progressives say are the racists ones) who are the ones "defending black and other minorities" who are conservatives. The same way progressives claimed that the "racist" GOP was trying to "copy" Obama with selecting Michael Steele as GOP Committee Chairman, they will definitely double down on the claim with Herman Cain. If the GOP is racist, why would they want to copy Obama? Don't try to figure it out. Brainwashing isn't suppose to make sense in the real world just to progressives.
21 Comments:
Liberals, dems, and progressives are scared of black Conservatives.
"Herb Cain", as Sarah Palin calls him, would never get the republican nomination. Sorry Herb, but your're the one brainwashed. Your're the one who thinks that white republicans are going to vote for you in the primaries. Don't bet your last dollar on Cain staying in the race past New Hampshire. I can guarantee that Cain will not get the republican nomination.
Gerald T.-
Gerald T""Herb Cain", as Sarah Palin calls him, would never get the republican nomination"
Unless you have the inside track on information the rest of the public doesn't know, you are merely providing your opinion. Maybe he'll win it and maybe he won't. You can call me brainwashed, the reality is that I can back up everything I say with facts. Brainwashed people can't do that. I know as a fact that the Republican establishments wants moderate candidate in the mold of McCain, Dole Bush etc so who knows how things are going to play out come the Iowa Caucus and beyond. Thanks for your input though Gerald. Obama won the nomination and presidency, because he was the "right kind" of black person to run. Read the article by David Ehrenstein of the LA Time entitled Barack The Magic Negro to bring. A blacks who had a negro dialect and were too black like Jackson, Sharpton and Carol Mosley Braun never had a chance of winning the Democratic nomination.
Gerald T. or are you Janeane Garofalo?
CB;"Morgan is a classic case of a person being an ignorant fool, because he like many blacks "never seem to have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what they regurgitate. Blacks who call the tea party racist never even been to one, that includes Morgan Freeman".
I've never been to Sea World, but I'm willing to bet you there is lots of water and plenty of fish...
About a year ago you posted a video story about Detroit produced by Steven Crowder. Taking what you've told me over the years, I don't think you ever mentioned that you've been to Detroit. Still, you agreed with everything he said in the video, even a blatant lie that UAW auto workers earn an average $130,000/yr in wages and benefits. (the truth is HERE on that greedy ole' UAW website, with the figures supported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics)
However, my point is this... Morgan Freeman gave his opinion based on what he see's coming from the Tea Party through the media and it's outlets. Tyrone, you accepted blatant lies from Crowders (media) video as fact, and then negated my "proof" showing that Crowder was wrong.
But now you want to attack Freemans opinion, and claim that his not having "FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE" as a reason to support your attack against him. But when the "failures of liberal Detroit" was the issue (a place you have no FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of), everything your conservative mentor told you was gospel.
The Tea Party has had vast media coverage from many different perspectives, including liberal and conservative views. Freeman obviously has seen this varied coverage. However, you took the work of "ONE" conservative, posted it on your website and backed everything he said without any "FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE."
You have absolutely no idea what the truth is Tyrone. As long as you keep your ear turned to the "right", never exploring or turning your head to see the rest of the world around you, you'll never know the truth.
"You have absolutely no idea what the truth is Tyrone. As long as you keep your ear turned to the "right", never exploring or turning your head to see the rest of the world around you, you'll never know the truth."
And i suppose you do Allen. The truth of course speaks for itself.
I hope for everyone's sake, Cain gets in or Palin unless, Allen you want everything to remain the same as it has been thus far. Do you support the majority of center/right American's or the few elite, special interests, academic/environmental wackos, hollywood bubble crowd, fascists, socialists and union thugs who get favors from the Government and some corrupt corporations? What in God's name do you not like about Cain man, i mean i have yet to see anything i do not like about him as opposed to our current command in chief who wants another Europe. He flakes on his words, spins his ideology to win votes and i can tell you right now what may work for Europe will not work here but then again let us look at Greece, Spain, Ireland, France, the UK. Hmmmmm... Cain means what he says and after watching more interviews and speeches then i can count i have yet to see a divergence, that is unless someone takes him out of context and edits a video of his. We all know that TYT's love to do that and let us not start with mainstream media networks. The man is smart and has a background to prove he can do the job. Obama is a freakin' community organizer and he is good at being slick and buttering up to people. That is not going to do the job. He should join a social club. I see in Cains eyes that he means he is serious. His 999 plan vs stimulus, more borrowing and a huge solar program. What do you think will benefit our economy? Conservatives want power to the people as opposed to Liberals who want power to the Government. What do you want?
Oh and for the record, there records. Cain made several successes over his years, degrees and Palin left the state with a surplus. What has Obama done again? What has he succeeded at exactly and do not tell me the Conservatives where in his way. That is not it at all, nice try. ;)
Also, your going to love this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bpb9DymmoU&feature=related
Anon;"Gerald T. or are you Janeane Garofalo?.
Example of "irony" you ask? The other day I received a letter that read;
"I wish people would stop hiding behind false names!".
It was signed, "Anonymous"...
p allen "About a year ago you posted a video story about Detroit produced by Steven Crowder. Taking what you've told me over the years, I don't think you ever mentioned that you've been to Detroit. Still, you agreed with everything he said in the video, even a blatant lie that UAW auto workers earn an average $130,000/yr in wages and benefits. (the truth is HERE on that greedy ole' UAW website, with the figures supported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics) "
Still laughing allen. You try so hard just to keep coming up empty. I reported that the UAW earn $130,000 a year in wages in benefits based on what was reported by other sites besides Steven Crowder allen. Second why didn't you post the figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics? You only posted the numbers from the UAW. I see what you are trying to do, and you are doing it badly. This is about Hermain Cain, the tea party and people who claim the tea party are racists but have never been to one. Trying Saul Alinsky on me is funny. Deflect attention away from what was said in an attempt to defame the messenger instead. Am I close allen? ;-)
Tyrone! Love your Youtube vids brudda. I did a Podcast yesterday scheduled to post in the morning. I touch on how these leftist continue to toss around this "racist" charge. And how it's demeaning to what true racism is all about.
The more these lunatics continue to use this word, the more it will loose it's meaning. Anyway, I think your Youtube vids are great.
With your permission, I'd like to post your vid along with my Podcast post. Keep up the great work T.
Robb -
P.S. Go Browns!
I found it interesting that Blitzer apparently thought the word 'brainwashed' to be a bit strong of a term.
That's probably because he is so completely brainwashed himself.
CB"I reported that the UAW earn $130,000 a year in wages in benefits based on what was reported by other sites besides Steven Crowder allen".
You reported it based on "other sites", so you're admitting that you didn't do any fact checking. So in effect, you're blindly spreading lies. And, what did you say about "lemmings?"
CB;"why didn't you post the figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics?".
Because all the information shown on the UAW site is sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Do you think the UAW would "lie" about union wages and benefits, then claim the government as the source?
CB;"I see what you are trying to do, and you are doing it badly.".
Au contraire, mon frère! You have no concrete proof. The only thing that matters is what you are "TOLD" to believe. Here's what your right-wing conservative think tanks do to "wash your brain."
The automobile makers and other large companys publish their SEC filings and annual reports. These materials include cash compensation, benefits, fringes, training costs, retiree benefits, etc..., provided to all employee's. The totals are what the company attempts to explain as it's "operating costs", not what is actually paid to each employee. It's a common accounting practice used by large corporations.
Therefore, you can take the Walmarts or 7/11's SEC filings and annual reports and calculate a cashiers total compensation at $50,000+ a year!
Crowder told you "EXPLICITLY" (along with an on screen graphic) that UAW workers earn $130,000 a year. The fact is "THEY DON'T." I know for a fact because I have family members, and know of thousands of auto workers here in Detroit who have pay stubs showing their wages and benefits. THEY DON'T EARN $130,000/YR!!!!!!!!!
So your answer for "what I'm trying to do", is exactly what I've shown. When told to believe "right-wing spin", you do exactly that, and you do so even at the cost of being hypocritical.
You have no "FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE" of the wages and benefits of UAW workers. Crowder "TOLD" you what they were, and what he told you is a "LIE." Yet, you chastise Morgan Freeman as having no "FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE" of the Tea Party, and his assertion was merely an "OPINION."
You believe a conservative who tells you a lie. Yet you attack a man that merely has an opinion? Plain and simple, you think exactly what you're told to think!
CB"I reported that the UAW earn $130,000 a year in wages in benefits based on what was reported by other sites besides Steven Crowder allen".
You reported it based on "other sites", so you're admitting that you didn't do any fact checking. So in effect, you're blindly spreading lies. And, what did you say about "lemmings?"
CB;"why didn't you post the figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics?".
Because all the information shown on the UAW site is sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Do you think the UAW would "lie" about union wages and benefits, then claim the government as the source?
CB;"I see what you are trying to do, and you are doing it badly.".
Au contraire, mon frère! You have no concrete proof. The only thing that matters is what you are "TOLD" to believe. Here's what your right-wing conservative think tanks do to "wash your brain."
The automobile makers and other large companys publish their SEC filings and annual reports. These materials include cash compensation, benefits, fringes, training costs, retiree benefits, etc..., provided to all employee's. The totals are what the company attempts to explain as it's "operating costs", not what is actually paid to each employee. It's a common accounting practice used by large corporations.
Therefore, you can take the Walmarts or 7/11's SEC filings and annual reports and calculate a cashiers total compensation at $50,000+ a year!
Crowder told you "EXPLICITLY" (along with an on screen graphic) that UAW workers earn $130,000 a year. The fact is "THEY DON'T." I know for a fact because I have family members, and know of thousands of auto workers here in Detroit who have pay stubs showing their wages and benefits. THEY DON'T EARN $130,000/YR!!!!!!!!!
So your answer for "what I'm trying to do", is exactly what I've shown. When told to believe "right-wing spin", you do exactly that, and you do so even at the cost of being hypocritical.
You have no "FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE" of the wages and benefits of UAW workers. Crowder "TOLD" you what they were, and what he told you is a "LIE." Yet, you chastise Morgan Freeman as having no "FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE" of the Tea Party, and his assertion was merely an "OPINION."
You believe a conservative who tells you a lie. Yet you attack a man that merely has an opinion? Plain and simple, you think exactly what you're told to think!
anon ""You have absolutely no idea what the truth is Tyrone. As long as you keep your ear turned to the "right", never exploring or turning your head to see the rest of the world around you, you'll never know the truth.""
Educate me on what the truth is then. No emotions, no talking points, just give me the facts and let's go from there. I use to be a moderate Democrat a long time ago, because I was told to be one. Now I am an independent conservative. For me to have changed my views and not be what I once was is, because I LEARNED that everything I was told was a lie. So once again educate me on what I don't know and let's see if you have a valid point.
Robb "The more these lunatics continue to use this word, the more it will loose it's meaning. Anyway, I think your Youtube vids are great. "
The word racist has already lost it's potency robb. It has become nothing more then a blanket attack word by the left to smear anyone who doesn't agree with them. It will only mean anything again once a person who is TRULY identified as being one is pointed out. Also, you can use my videos, feel free. That is why I made them in order to spread the word. As for the browns, all I can say is for them to beat the Steelers when they play them, everything else is optional. lol
JD Curtis" I found it interesting that Blitzer apparently thought the word 'brainwashed' to be a bit strong of a term.
That's probably because he is so completely brainwashed himself."
Very much so. People like Blitz believes that blacks voting 90% for a political party with nothing to show for it is normal. Instead of black and white progressives getting upset with what Herman Cain said, why don't they just provide the evidence to debunk what he said. They can't do it.
p allen "You reported it based on "other sites", so you're admitting that you didn't do any fact checking. So in effect, you're blindly spreading lies. And, what did you say about "lemmings?""
Let's end this once and for all allen. You're sticking your chest out like you have me in a check mate position. Sorry you have to snatch defeat from the jaws of what you think is a victory yet again. Do you remember a company called Delphi Auto motives allen? If you don't, let me bring you up to speed. Delphi is a parts maker that was once apart of GM. The company went bankrupt due to high UAW labor and retirement legacy costs. This is what the then Chief Financial Officer John Sheehan had to say about the costs burden prior to the bankruptcy
John Sheehan "As part of its 1999 split from GM, Delphi is locked into the same contract covering pay, benefits and job and income security -- at an annual cost of nearly $130,000 per worker -- as the carmaker. "
So ONE the original people who made the $130,000 claim was the CFO of the once subsidiary of GM. The guy who crunches the numbers for Delphi knows more about the labor costs then the federal government I would think. The story was posted in the Detroit News, GMinsider, Forbes etc. So Steven Crowder didn't pull that figure out of his butt and everybody else ran with it. It was already common knowledge thanks to John Sheehan AND OTHERS WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF IT'S LABOR COSTS. Here's the right cross allen. This story is from 2005 long before GM and Chrysler went bankrupt and long before Steven Crowder said two words about the UAW. It from the website automotive site "The Car Connection". It quoted the then Chief Executive Officer of Delphi Robert Steven Miller in which he said
Robert S Miller "If these discussions do not lead to the implementation of a plan that addresses our existing legacy liabilities and the resulting high cost of U.S. operations, we will consider other strategic alternatives, including Chapter 11 reorganization for our U.S. businesses, to preserve the value of the company and complete our transformation plan,” Miller said.
Miller said the bill for each of the company’s unionized employees is about $130,000 annually, including wages and benefits."
Did you say something allen about me using the word lemmings?
You can read the story here. One day you will kick the football allen, I won't keep yanking it away from you. In the mean time. CHECK MATE AND SIT DOWN. Education Time Allen
CB;"One day you will kick the football allen, I won't keep yanking it away from you. In the mean time. CHECK MATE AND SIT DOWN".
John Sheehan said; "As part of its 1999 split from GM, Delphi is locked into the same contract covering pay, benefits and job and income security -- at an annual "COST" of nearly $130,000 per worker -- as the carmaker. "
I told you; The totals are what the company attempts to explain as it's "operating costs", not what is actually paid to each employee.
I said the exact same thing as what you just quoted! And you still don't get it....
You're not stupid Tyrone. You're just angry and frustrated. You know the difference between what a company calls "COST" per worker, and what the worker actually "EARNS." Yet you didn't take the time to read what I posted, nor read what the guy from Delphi actually stated. Crowder stated, and screen splashed the figure as "EARNINGS." He is wrong.
It "COSTS" the government about $200,000 to train a soldier. A two year active duty soldier at the rank of Private "EARNS" about $18,000 a year. So, does that mean that a two year active duty private in the army "EARNS" $68,000 a year??????
I tell you, and show you what is the truth. You post a comment from Delphi that tells you exactly what I told you. Yet, you try to pretend you've "checkmated" me? Hmmmmmm?
My intent isn't to change your conservative views or change your mind about anything. My intent is to have a honest, spirited and decent debate. If the frustration of being wrong is bothering you, don't take it out on me, I'm just relaying a message.
And since you're fond of anecdotes (like the Charlie Brown and Lucy football kicking), here's one you might want to consider--
Being that I am an average working American, I would never be a part of the Republican/Conservative movement. I see that being a Conservative is the same as the farm animals taking part by playing a role in a "bacon and eggs breakfast." The "chickens", they just play a part and contribute to the breakfast. However, the "pigs" role is total commitment.
p allen "I told you; The totals are what the company attempts to explain as it's "operating costs", not what is actually paid to each employee. "
Have you ever play twister? I'm just curious. Just give it up. Look up the term legacy costs. Retirees are apart of operating costs, they aren't apart of the labor expense but the company is still obligated to pay their retirement. Operating expenses Operating expenses on the income statement consists of costs not directly required in the manufacturing or sale of goods or service. Union health benefits fall under operating expenses. These two are the opposite of manufacturing or production expenses.
p allen "You're not stupid Tyrone. You're just angry and frustrated. You know the difference between what a company calls "COST" per worker, and what the worker actually "EARNS." Yet you didn't take the time to read what I posted, nor read what the guy from Delphi actually stated. Crowder stated, and screen splashed the figure as "EARNINGS." He is wrong. "
I know I am not stupid, thank for noticing. I'm also not angry. I'm just right, and you are wrong. Funny how it always work out that way isn't it? What brought down Delphi as well as GM and Chrysler were the costs in benefits to secure the UAW labor to produce it's products, point blank. You can play fanancy with the word Earnings if you like. People know what it is. Since the retiree and health care benefits were in the union contracts, the rank and file will say that "they have EARNED THOSE BENEFITS through collective bargaining.
I've been posting here for how long Tyrone...4, maybe 5 years? Over those years we have often debated the meaning of particular terms, words or phrases. To this day I don't think you have ever admitted being wrong in one of those debates. It's all well and fine though. I know it will happen again. And at that time I'll show you how you contradict yourself again.
If you want to, and need to tell people that UAW workers earn 130k a year, or an army private earns 60k, or a Walmart cashier earns 50k, I won't and cant stop you. Just keep in mind that the person, or persons you're telling, just might have one of those jobs, and they will think you're crazy. (or a conservative)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUVGt9umOME&feature=related
Here is another good one. I very much like the analysis here.
tHERE IS ONE THING not even mentioned here.
Obama is a true African American and Cain is a regular Black American. Americans who are black are still stuck on stupid as they dont even know what is really happening.
The movie "The Birth of a Nation" where white men were warned that Black men would rape their blonde women. The movie caused much hatred of innocent Black men and their death.
Why cant a dark skinned man be president? A mixed blood man is accepted as a payment for equality! Really!
Why cant a Black American be president. A mainland Black who was raised by both parents who worked hard that he grew up right.
Harry Reid said Obama won because he was light skinned and spoke well. WAKE UP BLACK AMERICA!
Post a Comment
<< Home