Bill Maher's racial attack against Herman Cain via Newt Gingrich.
Liberals like Bill Maher actually live in a wonderland mindset in which they believe they can say anything racist, and it would never be perceived as such. His attack against Herman Cain really erked me. I'm use to progressive racism towards black republicans and conservatives, but this one actually got to me.
It's slight of hand racist remarks like the one Bill Maher made is what unfortunately Herman Cain is going to have to deal with in his campaign. As usual, the racism came from the ones who claim to embrace diversity, "liberals". Maher's so called joke wasn't even funny, except to the dim witted drones who make up his audience and clap at his lame jokes on demand. As usual, it's a liberal who brought up race and attacked a person of a different race, because that person doesn't think like him. If a comedian would have "joked" and said during the primaries in 2008 that "Hillary Clinton" is a Democrat and she is getting beat by a black guy "Obama", you all know what the blow back would have been against that comedian. There is no questioning that. In this case, because Stewart is a white liberal, Newt is a white pseudo conservative and Herman Cain is a black conservative, Bill Maher won't get any negative feedback for his remarks. He's so lucky he never had to debate a conservative who is black like myself. He wouldn't be laughing after five minutes with me. There seems to be a pattern with race and Bill. Maybe Bill doesn't think Herman could be a "real black president".
And this guy has the nerve to say Republicans are the ones who are more likely to be racist, whatever Bill.
It's slight of hand racist remarks like the one Bill Maher made is what unfortunately Herman Cain is going to have to deal with in his campaign. As usual, the racism came from the ones who claim to embrace diversity, "liberals". Maher's so called joke wasn't even funny, except to the dim witted drones who make up his audience and clap at his lame jokes on demand. As usual, it's a liberal who brought up race and attacked a person of a different race, because that person doesn't think like him. If a comedian would have "joked" and said during the primaries in 2008 that "Hillary Clinton" is a Democrat and she is getting beat by a black guy "Obama", you all know what the blow back would have been against that comedian. There is no questioning that. In this case, because Stewart is a white liberal, Newt is a white pseudo conservative and Herman Cain is a black conservative, Bill Maher won't get any negative feedback for his remarks. He's so lucky he never had to debate a conservative who is black like myself. He wouldn't be laughing after five minutes with me. There seems to be a pattern with race and Bill. Maybe Bill doesn't think Herman could be a "real black president".
And this guy has the nerve to say Republicans are the ones who are more likely to be racist, whatever Bill.
14 Comments:
Can we say Hypocritical.
CB;"I'm use to progressive racism towards black republicans and conservatives, but this one actually got to me".
So all it takes for a "White Liberal" to be racist is make a statement about a Black Republican, and that irks you? Being "use to" something makes it that much easier to become bias, closed minded and easy to be convinced...even if lied to.
Bill Maher has made racially charged statements about president Obama. Does that irk you? Bill Maher has made racially charged statements about Black women. Does that irk you? Bill Maher has made racially charged statements about Arab/Muslim women. Does that irk you?
CB;"And this guy has the nerve to say Republicans are the ones who are more likely to be racist, whatever Bill".
Yet you claim to be "use to progressive racism." So, what's the difference between Maher and you? He claims it's one way, you claim it's the opposite. So, who's right?
There's only one basic difference between Maher and yourself, and it's not ideology.
In actuality you should be use to racially charged statements from all sides. Contrary to your narrow beliefs, Maher, as an entertainer is viewed as being no different than a Rush Limbaugh or a Mel Gibson. Hell, Gibson used the "N-word" and still makes movies and plenty of money.
Limbaugh has been doing his thing far longer than Marher. Limbaugh has a far larger audience than Maher. Limbaugh is probably 10 times richer than Maher. If you know anything about the entertainment industry, common sense would tell you that Limbaugh is a much larger target than Maher.
And the one basic difference between them is "ideology."
That second clip where Maher talks about Obama becoming the POTUS, I remember a lot of black Obama supporters attacked him for that joke. Last I heard, he was forgiven for that.
Now, he makes a joke that involves Herman Cain via Newt Gingrich. Black liberals are not going to be too upset over that. According to most black liberals, Cain is a "sellout".
I make a joke or have an opinion about Obama, and I get attacked and label a "racist" by some of these black liberals. I wasn't going to let them throw the race bomb at me so I asked them one time what their thoughts about George W. Bush (by the way, I'm not a Bush supporter) and they have harsh opinions about him. Are they not being "racist"? As I expected, they got really indignant and defensive.
p allen "So all it takes for a "White Liberal" to be racist is make a statement about a Black Republican, and that irks you? Being "use to" something makes it that much easier to become bias, closed minded and easy to be convinced...even if lied to.
You tell me allen. There are white and black liberals who are calling conservatives racists simply, because they call Obama a "socialist".
Calling Obama a socialist is considered the "New N Word" by liberals There is a double standard, and the example I gave you can't say that I am wrong. If Maher's attack was against Gingrich, why did he bring up Cain and not other republican candidates allen? Don't play stupid, take the blinders off.
p allen "
Bill Maher has made racially charged statements about president Obama. Does that irk you? "
It irked me in regards to the double standard allen. I commented about Maher's "Real Black President" skit several times. I even said that Maher was way wrong for doing what he did. A real black president wouldn't be a thug like Maher "joked" about. Who's to say that next we will say that Obama should be eating "fried chicken" or "watermelons like a "real black president" would?
p allen "Bill Maher has made racially charged statements about Black women. Does that irk you? Bill Maher has made racially charged statements about Arab/Muslim women. Does that irk you?"
Sounds like you are defending him allen. Let me guess, your a member of the Bill Maher fan club? That would explain a lot actually.
p allen "Yet you claim to be "use to progressive racism." So, what's the difference between Maher and you? He claims it's one way, you claim it's the opposite. So, who's right?"
I'm not use to liberals letting racist comments by liberals always being swept under the rug. Unlike you allen, I can call a spade a spade. Tell the truth and shame the devil so to speak.
p alen "Limbaugh has been doing his thing far longer than Marher. Limbaugh has a far larger audience than Maher. Limbaugh is probably 10 times richer than Maher. If you know anything about the entertainment industry, common sense would tell you that Limbaugh is a much larger target than Maher."
Gee, how did I figure Limbaugh was going to be brought into this? What does Limbaugh's net worth have to do with Maher's comments? Something got lost in translation allen. Maher's comments got under my skin a little, but I am not stressing over it. I accept Maher for the person he is.
anon "That second clip where Maher talks about Obama becoming the POTUS, I remember a lot of black Obama supporters attacked him for that joke. Last I heard, he was forgiven for that."
Let Maher have been a conservative, and see if blacks would have forgiven him. lol
anon "Black liberals are not going to be too upset over that. According to most black liberals, Cain is a "sellout"."
BINGO!! To black liberals, "Democratic political affiliation trumps race" every time. That is why black liberal always turn a blind eye to the bill mahers and harry reid types. By them doing so in turning a blind eye, they expose themselves as frauds and hypocrites whenever they cry race about something they perceive as being racist on the right.
I must first disclose that because of his political treachery I do not support the inherent usurper of our constitution Hussein Obama. Secondly because of the liberal negro mindset of taking from the producers in white America under the guise of redistribution of wealth.
Cain attempts to place himself above his Negro brethren. He plays the adversarial role by denying the title of African American. As a white American I am proud of my European Irish roots. Self denial and pity seem to flow through many negros veins.
CB;"Sounds like you are defending him allen. Let me guess, your a member of the Bill Maher fan club?".
Sounds like? So you think you can hear what I'm thinking? I wouldn't defend Maher's silliness as much as I wouldn't defend yours...
CB;"Gee, how did I figure Limbaugh was going to be brought into this?.
You figured right! Because you've defended Limbaugh's racial silliness on several occasions, and you know you have. So, the moment a "right-wing" outlet summons their Black Conservative base to cry "double-standard" you all react in kind!
I have shown you how Maher has made racially charged statements about those on the right and the left. So where's the condemnation of Limbaugh? Or do you really believe that Rush has never done the same? If that's the case, then the only "double-standard" being applied here is coming from YOU!
You knew that Limbaugh would be brought in because you know he's made racially charged statements. The difference is that "YOU" (because of your allegiance to the conservative authority) defend his silliness.
Perhaps Maher should do a parody of Herman Cain as "The Magic Negro." Rush did it and your defense of him was; "he didn't coin the phrase, he just repeated it and turned it into a song." So you shouldn't have a problem with (or would irk you) Maher turning any racial comments about Cain into a joke or song....
really full informative review... we got the point.
Anon;"Cain attempts to place himself above his Negro brethren. He plays the adversarial role by denying the title of African American. As a white American I am proud of my European Irish roots. Self denial and pity seem to flow through many negros veins".
Huh? Negro veins? What are Negro veins?
Anyways.... Herman Cain, in my opinion is an opportunist. The very first public comment that I read coming from Cain was; "don't blame me because the first Black president was bad." Imagine if Larry Doby (the 2nd Black to play major league baseball) had said; "don't expect me to play like Jackie Robinson, I'm not that good." Or the 3rd Black to play says; "don't blame me because Doby didn't play like Robinson."
Stupid statements such as those takes away any credibility of being a "self-confident HUMAN BEING." One who's willing to stand on his OWN merits and talents, and not personal idea's of contrived failures or successes of your predecessors.
I think because he is a "Black Conservative" he believes that his senseless spewing of conservative talking points will win him some kind of credibility in the Republican party. Stupid is as stupid does...
Cain actually didn't know that Article VI of the United States Constitution states; "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States". Had he known he wouldn't have said something as stupid as this.
p allen "Anyways.... Herman Cain, in my opinion is an opportunist. The very first public comment that I read coming from Cain was; "don't blame me because the first Black president was bad."
You claim Herman Cain is an "opportunist"? I would love to hear what you think about Barack Hussein Obama being an opportunist allen. In my opinion, anyone who runs for public office are opportunists. It's common sense. What person who run for public office if he or she didn't believe they had a chance at winning. I don't blame can for his words. I said before when I wrote my first story on Herman Cain that he will have an uphill fight, because a certain percentage of people will look at the failure of Obama as a black man being president and will assume that no black man can be successful in that position.Of course it's wrong and stupid to believe that, but there are still people who do. I know exactly what Cain meant, and he is correct.
p allen "Cain actually didn't know that Article VI of the United States Constitution states; "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States". Had he known he wouldn't have said something as stupid as this."
You should have listened to Cain's comments closer. Cain talked about testing the person's loyalty especially if that person is Muslim. He didn't say anything about a "religious test". Since a large amount of Muslims want to harm this country, he's right in his approach. He needs to know who he can trust and who he can't. If there was a such thing as Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish and Christian sleeper cells in this country, then that would apply to them as well.
p allen "I think because he is a "Black Conservative" he believes that his senseless spewing of conservative talking points will win him some kind of credibility in the Republican party. Stupid is as stupid does..."
Senesless talking points? You mean like
"tax cuts are for the rich"
"people who make over $250k are rich"
"the rich need to pay their fare share"
"Republicans want to push grandma off a cliff"
"Republicans want grandma to eat dog food"
In other words, sit down allen. Cain has by far more credibility then Obama ever had prior to running for President. Obama's resume can't even come close to Herman Cain's. Put the bong down.
CB;"anyone who runs for public office are opportunists. It's common sense. What person who run for public office if he or she didn't believe they had a chance at winning".
Man o' man... Here again, either you have no clue what "opportunism" means, or you're attempting to redefine, spin, degrade or flat out lie about the actual meaning of a term.
opportunism: (n)the practice of taking advantage of opportunities or circumstances regardless of what one should do or what might happen.
Herman Cain's only intent is to gain some sort of "browning points" with conservatives. He's using the effect of the Black man elected as president (Obama presidency) as a springboard for his personal aspirations. What are his personal aspirations? Hell, I don't have a clue. But it's definitely NOT to be elected POTUS!!!
No U.S. president has never been elected without first serving in some form of government. Be it in the military, or some other appointed position. With no real experience in government, Cain knows his limitations. Hell, he wouldn't know what to do, or how to act if he won a primary race, let alone the Republican nomination.
CB;"You should have listened to Cain's comments closer. Cain talked about testing the person's loyalty especially if that person is Muslim".
Say whuuuuud? Click on the link I provided earlier, listen to his entire response, and directly QUOTE where Cain says anything about testing a persons loyalty!
Mind you, I'm not talking about what he said "after" he was challenged about the statement. Every one changes their story after they've been caught saying something stupid. Now you should listen to Cain's ACTUAL comments closer...
Did you hear what he said? Okay, now you can go into "spin-mode" and clarify, change the meaning, cut/chop and paste, walk-back, dance around, white-wash, redefine, or just out right lie! It still doesn't change what he said, and what he meant!
CB;"Cain talked about testing the person's loyalty especially if that person is Muslim".
DUUUHHHH.... Earth to Tyrone, earth calling Tyrone... "Testing someone's loyalty" because of their religion (Muslim, Christian, whatever...) is a RELIGIOUS TEST!!!! Are you losing every bit of common sense god gave you? Conservatism must be destroying your brain cells.
Oh wait, I get it. You're suffering from "Gingrich's disease."
"any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood".
-Newt Gingrich-
P. Anthony, how do you define loyalty to America?
Statistically Blacks are more prone to violence than any other group in American society. Politically, communities that are controlled by blacks are the worse area's in this country. Black cultural social trends adopted by mainstream America typically consist of the negative images, distort the English language and contribute nothing to improving American society. No one really knows if the first black president was born in the U.S. We do know that the first black president is not a Christian and at the very least a secret Muslim. And in keeping with the customary pattern of thought, action, and behavior, the first black president is the worse president this country has ever had. When left to your own devises blacks are nearly as big a threat to American stability as any Muslim.
However, I do employ blacks and I would hire a Muslim. I employ those who have proven and loyal. Those who don't condone and are outspoken against what we see as the average black. As a outspoken conservative Herman Cain has proven himself, so he's fine in my book.
Anon;"P. Anthony, how do you define loyalty to America?.
I don't "define" loyalty to America no where near how you define it...
Anon;"Those who don't condone and are outspoken against what we see as the average black. As a outspoken conservative Herman Cain has proven himself, so he's fine in my book".
Excuse me if I offend you here but... YOU MUST BE OUT OF YOUR RABID ASS MIND!
You need "proof" that a Black person is not the gun toting gang member you've seen in a rap artists videos? You want Blacks to "prove" they're not one of those criminal type's you read about in the newspapers or see on the nightly news? You need Blacks to "prove" they're not one of politically liberal progressives?
Sounds like.... no, your really are saying that you don't trust Blacks unless they do, say and think what you want them to do, say and think! More or less, for you to accept a Black person they must "kiss your White ass"!
Mr. or Miss Anon, whoever or whatever you are, you and your ilk are the main reason why I advocate that Blacks should have their own political, economic, educational, spiritual and culturally structured base. I believe that both the Democratic and Republican (liberals and conservatives) parties have driven Black Americans into the abyss that many Blacks find themselves.
Moreover, you are living "proof" that conservatism is no more an answer to the woes of Blacks than believing it was better off not leaving "massa's plantation" after slavery was abolished. Your idea seems to be the prevailing thought among many, if not all White conservatives. Black conservatives (such as Cain) must demonstrate a staunch and hardline belief in certain area's of conservative thought in order to be "accepted." Even if it's something [such as prejudice] which he himself had endured!
One of the most important and fundamental rights in modern democracies and republics is the presumption of innocence. By stripping away all semblance of that right, you reduce yourself beyond deserving of the loyalty which you claim so much you desire.
Post a Comment
<< Home