Steven Crowder exposes Jon Stewart for the fraud that he doesn't know he is.
I love watching Steven Crowder's videos. His sharp cynical wit is almost on par with mine, lol. Recently Steven exposed Jon Stewart's bias against conservatives. Honestly, I really don't care that Jon Stewart is a lamming progressive dirt bag. To each his own I always say. I just don't like people, when they act fake or pretend to be someone they aren't. Jon is a liberal who tries to pass himself off as a "moderate". Some people aren't that bright and unfortunately fall for his claim. His track record of comments throughout the years have more then discredited his claim. Well Steven Crowder pulled the curtain back on the real Jon Stewart and Jon wasn't pleased. Jon being moderate is as laughable as the "Coffee Party" claiming that they aren't liberal. Here's a quick side note about the "Coffee Party" by the way, the founder of the Coffee Party was a volunteer for Barack Obama. See what I mean about people pretending to be someone they aren't?
Jon has a policy of not having on his show conservatives pundits. It's a no "duh" why he and other liberals who host television shows do that. They know that they can't defend their beliefs and policies against conservatives. Jon Stewart like Bill Maher will have on their shows other liberals who agree with them, have their liberal audiences applaud at every lame joke they make, and it would make them appear to be so sophisticated, when in reality they are really anything but. Can you seriously imagine what would happen if I were a "guest" on Bill Maher or Jon Stewart's show? The producers of those shows would have to cut to commercial within the first three minutes, because I would be gleefully systemically destroying their thin perception of actual intelligence. I have no problem with debating liberals. I guess I'm more accepting of diverse points of views then liberals are. Maybe Jon Stewart should take notes from me. Good work Steven. One last thing about the phoniness which is Jon Stewart. He told the panel on CNN that they are "helping the corporations". Jon Stewart himself is employed by Comedy Central which is owned by the Viacom Corporation.
Jon has a policy of not having on his show conservatives pundits. It's a no "duh" why he and other liberals who host television shows do that. They know that they can't defend their beliefs and policies against conservatives. Jon Stewart like Bill Maher will have on their shows other liberals who agree with them, have their liberal audiences applaud at every lame joke they make, and it would make them appear to be so sophisticated, when in reality they are really anything but. Can you seriously imagine what would happen if I were a "guest" on Bill Maher or Jon Stewart's show? The producers of those shows would have to cut to commercial within the first three minutes, because I would be gleefully systemically destroying their thin perception of actual intelligence. I have no problem with debating liberals. I guess I'm more accepting of diverse points of views then liberals are. Maybe Jon Stewart should take notes from me. Good work Steven. One last thing about the phoniness which is Jon Stewart. He told the panel on CNN that they are "helping the corporations". Jon Stewart himself is employed by Comedy Central which is owned by the Viacom Corporation.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 12:56 AM
11 Comments:
CB;"Jon has a policy of not having on his show conservatives pundits".
Pundit: a person who gives opinions in an authoritative manner usually through the mass media.
Hummmm? A a person who gives opinions through the mass media... Jon Stewart's show would be considered "mass media." Although some might argue the idea, Conservatives are "persons" aren't they?
Donald Rumsfeld.
Evangelic Conservative HistorianDavid Barton.
John Bolton.
Mike Huckabee.
Bill Kristol.
Newt Gingrich.
Rand Paul.
Marc Thiessen.
The list goes on...
So what does that make your assertion that "Jon has a policy of not having on his show conservatives pundits?" Hummmmm.... Oh..Oh..!! I know what its called.... A BIG FAT LIE!
And as for Steven Crowder, you have to listen closely to the framework of his story. First off, the assertion of the Daily Show not having conservatives on supposedly came from a senior producer. He states he received an email, "that was sent to him, not to me, make a long story short", blah, blah blah... So, who is the "him" he's talking about? Also if the email was not meant for him, how did he get it?
Nevertheless, Crowder is disingenuous because the assertion that the Daily show does not book conservative pundits IS AN OBVIOUS LIE! Thus, Mr. Crowder must have an ulterior motive.
I first became aware that Crowder was a fake and grandiose liar from his video about Detroit. Although the video was chocked full of lies, the LIE that stood out most was his claim of a public school graduation rate of 25%. I work in the Detroit public school system and know for a fact that the graduation rate (although shamefully low) has never be lower than 56%.
Nevertheless, Crowder is vying for attention... in particular, Jon Stewart's attention. Perhaps he thinks he should be the conservative answer to Stewart. Every internet semi-political pundit wants to get into "show business." Crowder has one problem though. He's not bright, creative, innovative, clever, nor funny.
Allen, Huckabee and Gingrich aren't pundits per se'. Pundits are critics who make a living by writing and talking about those in power. Steve Crowder makes some valid points about John Stewarts liberal bias.
According to John Stewart, Stephen Colbert is a conservative....
Then how do you explain why Detroits population has been decreasing ever since the 60s when progressives just started to come out of the wood works and influenced academia and the like along the Detroit area? Where is the prosperity that was in the 40s and 50s? California has been ran by similar polices and look where we are at. I should know because i was born here and watched the decay. You live in a bubble sir. You are like the same folks in the bay area. They are well-off (some of them), in bed with the unions and illegals and comfortable while there policies are destroying the state abroad and they think they are doing us a favor. Do you really think powerful Unions and Government bailouts work? And do you really think government knows better then the free-market place of ideas?
One more thing. If Steven Crowder is a lair then Stewart is as well. But we all know where the real facts are. History and the records will reveal that. Compare Alaska and California and tell us who wins here. If you are smart, you will know the answer. If you think both loose, then you are very short-sided and ignorant. Records do not lie buddy.
p allen "Pundit: a person who gives opinions in an authoritative manner usually through the mass media."
How long did it take you to google the definition allen? lol Once again, you miss the point entirely. The point is that Jon Stewart is a fraud simply because he claims to be a moderate, when he isn't a moderate
! When he has liberals on his show and not conservatives, that is a clear indicator that he isn't a moderate! He's a deceiver. As I said before, I can care less that he is a liberal in denial, he should just be open and honest with himself and his viewers.
p allen "And as for Steven Crowder, you have to listen closely to the framework of his story. First off, the assertion of the Daily Show not having conservatives on supposedly came from a senior producer. He states he received an email, "that was sent to him, not to me, make a long story short", blah, blah blah... So, who is the "him" he's talking about? Also if the email was not meant for him, how did he get it? "
Keep spinning spin doctor.The email was sent to Crowders's manager, and crowder's manager gave it to him. Come on allen. This isn't about Crowder, it's about the fraud which is Jon Stewart. Once again, you are trying to deflect attention off of Stewart by tarring and feathering the messenger, Crowder.
Stewart had some conservatives on his show allen. You named 9 people allen that are somewhat conservative and two that actually are. That's all you have is nine? How many years has Stewart been on the air? How many guests over the years has he had? It's great that he has had some people with views opposite of him on his show. Just explain the email from The Daily Show's producer allen? Did Crowder make up the email or Did Stewart's producer create it. You heard producer's own words saying that "Stewart wears his beliefs on his sleeves". Moderates don't wear their beliefs on their sleeves, only conservatives and liberals do that. So who's lying allen?
Anon;"Allen, Huckabee and Gingrich aren't pundits per se'. Pundits are critics who make a living by writing and talking about those in power".
The moment Huckabee and Gingrich became "formerly elected politicians", struck a pin and open their mouths, then are "PAID" to give their opinions in a book, publication or on television, they became PUNDITS. I don't know what you do for a living, but the first time someone pays you to give your political opinion...you become a PUNDIT.
Anon;"Then how do you explain why Detroits population has been decreasing ever since the 60s.".
It's called "White Flight." Whites began to leave the city in the early 1960's. After the 1967 riot, Whites left in droves. Then, starting about the early 1980's, a large percentage of the Black middle-class began to move out. Does that make any sense to you?
The people who left Detroit, DID NOT leave due to any particular "political ideology." Racism was the initial cause (put on your 1960's hat or go get a history book). The 1960's was a turbulent time in race relations in Detroit. Mayor Jerome Cavanagh, although a Democrat, would have been a conservative by today's standards.
Subsequent increases in crime spurred even more flight. The Black middle class and upper middle class (Black doctors, lawyers, judges, executives, etc..) left "movin' on up" to the elite suburbs.
A lowering of the tax base which led to tax increases in the city. In case you didn't know, fewer working class people equates to fewer taxes. All the while the powers that be (police commissioners, fire chiefs, school superintendents, and other city officials) wanted to maintain their numbers, and powers, while the city was losing population at a drastic rate.
Anon;"You live in a bubble sir".
You live to "hack" sir!
Politicians, be they Democrat or Republican, look out for themselves not their so-called "constituents." Their only intent when spouting an ideology is to geek you up to become part of their "VOTING BLOC." Otherwise they could care less who you are or what you think.
Take for instance Chris Christie in New Jersey. Christie was asked by a "constituent" about his policy of cutting public education. Christie responded quite repugnant telling the lady that his kids were "none of her business."
Although it's always been this way, it should be apparently clear after the 2008 market crash that politicians cater to the rich. Who received the help from the (elected politicians) government to make sure no mansions, yachts, private jets and Rolls Royces' would be lost? Who, during this recession, has not felt the brunt of the economic downturn? Which economic class has seen more growth over the last 20 years as compared to all other classes?
Anon, if you're not already a multi-millionaire, you're living in a dream world. Moreover, if you truly believe that "rich people" are going to "create jobs" because their taxes are low, you're just another duped voting bloc hack.
Rich pundits have duped you to believe that a rich person who pays less taxes (or even no taxes at all) says to himself;
"Wow, I didn't have to pay lower taxes this year! I need to hire more people! So what there's a recession and sales are way down, and my business and personal bills are piling up. My Republican representative said "lower taxes create jobs" so I'm going to create jobs! I'm going to hire more people!".
Not only have these politicians told you what you want to hear, they have convinced you that what "they say", is what you want to hear!
Previous Post Correction-
The statement in italics should read;
"Wow, I didn't have to pay, or my taxes are lower this year! I need to hire more people!"
Post a Comment
<< Home