Steven Crowder discuses "Occupy Racism".
I have much respect for Steven Crowder for simply exposing just how idiotic and hypocritical progressives truly are. Progressives believe that if they can repeat something over and over even though they can't prove what they say, eventually people will just believe it just because of repetition. Of course in the real world, facts rain supreme in the validation of a person's claim about someone or group. The video I did a week ago about anti Semitic elements within the Occupy Wallstreet movement has now gotten over two thousand one hundred hits. Progressives don't like it that I've tainted their Occupy movement with the antisemitic broad brush the same way they have done with the Tea Party by painting the movement has being filled to the brim and overflowing with white racists. I was planning on doing a video on Herman Cain and the Tea Party this weekend, but Steven Crowder actually touched on some of the main themes I was going to use. I still might put it together next week if I feel it is necessary. Herman Cain is ahead in many polls mainly due to the Tea Party. Herman Cain is a Tea Party candidate. So why would white racist tea party folks overlook 8 white candidates running for the GOP nomination and decide to get behind the sole black guy who is actually blacker then Obama? Again, progressive logic isn't suppose to make sense to those who can actually think.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 12:32 PM
14 Comments:
Crowder really knows what makes a "full-on-black-dude"! As he says, "a real black guy not a bi-racial guy raised by white people."
How cool is that! A white dude, trying to tell black people what makes you not all black, or "full-on-black." Seems like I've heard this kind of message before....Hmmmmm?
Slave owners who raped black slave women needed to justify keeping their "property" enslaved. So to rationalize the continued enslavement of human beings, they came up with the notion that "one drop of black blood makes a person black."
The concept also applied to those off-springs of the so-called "mulatto." To further insure the concept of racial purity, White governments devised racial designations such as "quadroon, quintroon and octoroon to define anyone with African/Black ancestry. Although the terms are no longer commonly used to define a person of mixed race, the essence of thought manifests itself in American society.
Steve's just doing what he's been taught all his life. He doesn't realize that being white doesn't make you the arbiter of who's a "real black", "full-on-black", half-black, quarter black or any amount of black!! All that's been done before Steven.
In no way do I, or can I hold Steve responsible for the sins of any of his white ancestors, or for that matter, any white person in general. I'm just not that way. However when I hear whites like Steven Crowder, who's white, speak to define who or what is "really black", and who's not, it shows that he possesses the same mindset as those whites who chose to assign what is black, solely as a way to define the racial purity of being white.
p allen "How cool is that! A white dude, trying to tell black people what makes you not all black, or "full-on-black." Seems like I've heard this kind of message before....Hmmmmm"
You know what is "cooler" allen? That piece of human shit progressive who is a white woman by the name of Joy Behar trying to give "advice" to Herman Cain about the GOP not liking him. I'll post the video this weekend so you can defend her.
p allen "Slave owners who raped black slave women needed to justify keeping their "property" enslaved. So to rationalize the continued enslavement of human beings, they came up with the notion that "one drop of black blood makes a person black."
Sounds just like how progressives think about those who are none white being THEIR PROPERTY. Progressives have a problem with non whites exercising political ideological diversity in being conservative or registered Republican. Notice who are the ones cracking that whip at Herman Cain. It's not the GOP. Progressives are attacking him on his skin color while the GOP candidates are attacking him on his policy,999.
p allen "Steve's just doing what he's been taught all his life. He doesn't realize that being white doesn't make you the arbiter of who's a "real black", "full-on-black", half-black, quarter black or any amount of black!! All that's been done before Steven. "
The fact of the matter is that Crowder is right. Cain's mother and father were black. Obama's mother was white. Sorry but Barry is BIRACIAL. BI equals 2. Mono is 1. I know Crowder stuck a spur up your ass when he said that. I should send him an email thanking him.
p allen "In no way do I, or can I hold Steve responsible for the sins of any of his white ancestors, or for that matter, any white person in general. I'm just not that way. However when I hear whites like Steven Crowder, who's white, speak to define who or what is "really black", and who's not, it shows that he possesses the same mindset as those whites who chose to assign what is black, solely as a way to define the racial purity of being white."
Since militant blacks always talk about reparations and the 400 years of slavery, I have a question. What is the percentage of descendant slave's blood you think flows through the veins of Barack Hussein Obama?
What I don't understand is, how can some people relate to Barack Obama as a "black" man instead of a bi-racial man? It's the same thing with Halle Berry, she too is called a black woman instead of bi-racial woman.
What these two have in common other than having a black father and a white mother? Their father's left them and never came back. Obama only met his father briefly, and never saw him again until his death. Berry's never knew her father.
Please explain something to me: how can they embrace the black side of themselves and reject the white side? Obama was raised by his white grandparents, while Berry was raised by her white mother. You hardly hear Obama talk about the white side of his family. Maybe he rejected them after being brainwashed by the likes of Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
CB;"That piece of human shit progressive who is a white woman by the name of Joy Behar trying to give "advice" to Herman Cain about the GOP not liking him".
I saw the clip from The View and heard her comment. First off I don't need to defend Behar, she's her own person and defend herself. I did hear Whoopi's comment which posed a corrective addition to Behars "over the centuries the Republicans have not been black friendly." Whoopi commented that it has been "over the past 25 years or so."
Herman Cain says that, if nominated, he believes he'll get a third (33%) of the Black vote. If history reveals anything in tracking the Black vote and it's patterns, he's doing no more than dreaming. No Republican since 1965 has gotten no better than 15% of the black vote.
The fact is a large part of the black community (eg; "about 85 to 90%") thinks that Herman Cain is a nut case, if not a buffoon. Cain has more than once insulted the intelligence of the people who expect to vote for him. Put your thinking cap on Tyrone.
Now, seriously think about a Democratic candidate running for president saying, "Most blacks that vote Republican are brainwashed!" Now seeing that you don't and haven't voted Democrat anyway, is there anything about that statement that would make you switch your vote?
Could a Dem. or Repub. candidate for president attract independent voters by publicly saying; "Independent voters are just brainwashed suckers for the best campaign promises, so I can expect 30% of the independent vote."
Cain ascension in the polls is basically a "response effect", by "polled GOP voters", to having a black Democrat being elected president. There are hundreds of black Republican politicians who are far more qualified for the office of president than Herman Cain.
Herman Cain is a joke candidate. He's not serious, and the truth is he's making a fool out of the people who believe that he really is a serious candidate. Cain has shown that he knows nothing about presidential politics. In the end, Cain will not be the GOP nominee. Come nest year when the "real" nominee has been chosen, you'll have fond memories of the "polled GOP success of the black guy."
CB;"Progressives have a problem with non whites exercising political ideological diversity in being conservative or registered Republican. Notice who are the ones cracking that whip at Herman Cain".
It was Cain himself that fired the first racial salvo. Not soon after announcing his "so-called presidential campaign," he told reporters that he is "blacker than president Obama." He went on to follow that up with his "blacks are brainwashed" comments.
Political inexperience and the lack of common sense of Herman Cain was shown early in his candidacy. After officially declaring his candidacy he said, "Don’t condemn me because the first black one (president) was bad.” And not soon there after, color blind conservatives began to proclaim that Herman Cain was a "real black man."
Cain may be a dumb politician, but he is definitely a smart business man. He knows how to make money. He realizes he has no chance of becoming the nominee.
Hey Tyrone, just for laughs I can recall the essays you wrote touting your certainty of a presidential run by Sarah Palin. How is that working out for ya'? Not to good I suppose... Herman Cain knows he'll never get the Republican nomination. Cain is taking a page from the Palin; "Pimp the Conservative while pretending to run for president, sell books and get paid lots of money for speaking engagements- Tour Show!!". Cain should be giving the pollsters a cut of the action!
Look at it this way though...if polls elected people, Cain could be the real "Black Messiah!"
CB;"The fact of the matter is that Crowder is right. Cain's mother and father were black. Obama's mother was white. Sorry but Barry is BIRACIAL..
Crowder is "RIGHT"?????? Mind you, this idea is coming from the view of two conservatives, who claim THEY DON'T SEE COLOR when it comes to a candidate. Yet Crowder can "see" real black, and a little black? That's just a bunch of smelly crap hidden behind a smoke screen of perfume.
Tyrone, the term "biracial" is a forethought design, a social construct, and an indication of being separate. "Biracial" is a designation given by whites to those they see as not being entirely white. It has nothing with a person being two distinctive interchangeable races. Nor does it mean that it's a race of it's own. What Crowder see's in both Cain and Obama is that neither one of them are WHITE!!
Mind you, Crowder didn't proffer that president Obama was a "mostly white." He consciously knows that the biracial label expresses a racial impurity, one that definitely excludes Barack Obama from the white race...which by the way, he claims "doesn't see."
Anonymous;"Please explain something to me: how can they embrace the black side of themselves and reject the white side?".
Silly question Anon. First off, humans born of "mixed race" didn't chose their white nor black parent. Secondly, American society chose to label them as "biracial."
I would guess what you mean by "embrace", is how a person of black/white mixed race would identify themselves, which the commonly used designation is black.
However, for a person of mixed race to identify themselves as Black, does not mean they are rejecting their "white side" or the white race. Because you're left handed doesn't mean that you're in "rejection" of your right hand, does it? Chances are you really didn't get to choose to be left handed. It likely it just happened that way.
Unfortunately the history of the determinant of race in America still persists. Rather you like it, accept it, agree with it or not, in America White men of European descent crafted and wrote the rules on who, and what is considered "non-white" (a.k.a. colored).
Using that same set of rules, all other "non-white" Americans began to craft so-called "acceptable terms" (such as bi-racial, multiracial, mixed, interracial, half, creole, etc..)Nevertheless, all these terms are specific as defining a person as being "non-white."
I love how P. Allen can only attack Crowder for having the audacity to say that Barack Obama is 1/2 Black (I'm half Black and half Asian so I guess he's only half as mad at me if I said the same thing--not that it isn't the truth or anything like that), but won't even touch the racism and anti-semitism that is pointed out in the video.
Will he even have the decency to say that "there are racist elements in" the Occupy movement like he has REPEATEDLY said "there are racist elements in the Tea Party" (even though Andrew Breitbart still has $100k ready for anyone who brings him evidence of Racism from Tea Partiers--so far no one is $100k richer by him)?
Anon;"I'm half Black and half Asian so I guess he's only half as mad at me if I said the same thing--not that it isn't the truth or anything like that".
Why would I be mad at you? First off, Steven Crowder is white. He knows nobody can refer to him as a "mixed, multicultural, bi-racial, half & half, mixed breed" nothing but white!
Listen to him closely as he says "Cain is a real black guy." Now, take Crowders poignant observation and apply it to yourself. How would Crowder describe you compared to...lets say me! Now, lets say that we totally forget about the politics. Lets just say you're who you are, and I am who I am. Heeeyyyy! Crowder would have to say that I'm the "real black guy?" So that makes you that "not so real, mixed, multicultural, bi-racial, half & half, mixed breed, etc.." guy, like Barack Obama.
My point is this Anon, I see you as a human being. The idea of labeling you or anyone else as "mixed" is a construct idea devised by white men long before you and I existed. The pervasive idea and it's social influence has cast its effects upon most people in America society. The fact is this... the terms "mixed, multicultural, bi-racial, half & half, mixed breed, etc.." in American society were concocted and designed to indicate only one thing...NON-WHITE!
Anon;"but won't even touch the racism and anti-semitism that is pointed out in the video.
Guess what...Two stupid people said some racist and stupid things in the Crowder video. The young lady that made the anti-Semitic comments was fired from her job. She was a substitute teacher and the school district felt her comments were out of line.
Anon;"Will he even have the decency to say that "there are racist elements in" the Occupy movement like he has REPEATEDLY said "there are racist elements in the Tea Party".
I've already said that there are racist, communist, Nazi's, gays, socialists, felons, and you name it who have involved themselves in the movement. However, I know that they're not anywhere near the majority, nor the driving force behind the movement.
Anon;"Andrew Breitbart still has $100k ready for anyone who brings him evidence of Racism from Tea Partiers--so far no one is $100k richer by him".
You mean the same Andrew Breitbart that "LIED" on Shirley Sherrod? I never would expect a liar to make good on anything. To prove my point, Breitbart won't even acknowledge an apology made by a tea-party member for racist photo as proof.
Let alone THIS. or
THIS. or
THIS. or
THIS. or
THIS was a tea party chairman.
Just a few, done with the direct support of tea party members. Breitbart simply says, "ohh, that's not racist, you're just to sensitive." Yet, according to some conservatives, the typical political styled attack on Herman Cain is somehow steeped in racism?
P Allen: Why would I be mad at you? First off, Steven Crowder is white. He knows nobody can refer to him as a "mixed, multicultural, bi-racial, half & half, mixed breed" nothing but white!
So now you're the thought police? Or he's just saying what the truth is and what everyone and YOU also know: Barack Obama has a Black father and a White mother.
Oh wait, it's because he's White and saying that. So White people can't talk about someone's lineage if they are not White because of your conceptions about how ALL White people use their words. He's channelling those slave owners and thinking about raping slave women when he says those things!!! It's not because Obama ACTUALLY has a White mother and Black father and Cain has Black parents.
And thank you for proving my other point.
Anon;"So White people can't talk about someone's lineage if they are not White because of your conceptions about how ALL White people use their words".
Ahhhh.....YEAH! But not necessarily because of "MY" conceptions. Whites shouldn't attempt to "diminish" another persons race because it has been done throughout American history.
Crowders idea and his "choice of words" (ie real black guy), in making his point is crass and condescending. The problem here Anon, is that you don't see it. It could be that you just don't see it the way I do. But the fact remains that, you just don't see it.
When speaking about someones else's race, you not talking about something that they themselves had a choice in. Neither are you talking about something that they, or you can change. Secondly - we know the history of racism in America. We know the history of white dominance, and the systematic coding of those who were not of "pure white European blood."
Now, the question is - in the post segregation 21th century, should a white person be so thoughtless and condescending to say to you; "You know Anon, you're not a real Black guy."
By the numbers, here's your food for thought;
1. If you thought it before being told, did you really need the idea reinforced?? Moreover, did you need it reinforced...BY A WHITE GUY?
2. If you did believe you were Black, wouldn't it kind of feel...INSULTING? Particularly coming from a WHITE GUY?
3. In either case, no. 1 or 2, A white person has now dictated to you what they see you as, and how they propose you to be.... WHICH IS A CONTINUANCE OF THE IDEOLOGY OF SUPERIORITY.
It's no wonder that I've yet to hear one Black conservative denounce Ann Coulters statement that "our blacks are better than there blacks." Yall know who the boss is....
"It's no wonder that I've yet to hear one Black conservative denounce Ann Coulters statement that "our blacks are better than there blacks." Yall know who the boss is...."
Perhaps it is because there is nothing wrong with her statement and they understood the context of what she means. Did you ever think about that one?
Eddie;"Perhaps it is because there is nothing wrong with her statement and they understood the context of what she means. Did you ever think about that one?".
Eddie, do you have a "built in context analyzer?" Even if you do, is there really a way to innocently "contextualize" every crass and condescending statement away?
Recently Texas Republican state Rep. Larry Taylor told an insurance association to do right by policy holders and not "Jew them down." How about you taking that statement and "contextualize" it for those who might be offended...
I'll wait...
Post a Comment
<< Home