From no bloody head, to maybe a bloody head to definitely a bloody head, ABC News finally gets it right.
Here's a quick note about jumping to conclusions without having all the facts on the table first. Remember when ABC News first reported that George Zimmerman didn't have any gashes on the back of his head which seemed to not collaborate with his claim that Trayvon Martin was pounding his head in the ground? Later, ABC News released an enhanced version of the Sanford Police video showing that Zimmerman did have gashes on the back of his head. Now after all this, ABC News has released the photo of George Zimmerman's bloody head which was taken on the scene three minutes after George Zimmeman shot Trayvon Martin.
The head prosecutor admitted that he didn't know who started the psychical confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin. I don't really don't care what the legal expert for ABC News said, because the prosecution shot himself in the foot by admitting that information. How can the prosecution team prove that Zimmerman was the aggressor, when they have no evidence of who was the aggressor? Unless they have evidence in the wing and were just "lying under oath", Zimmerman's defense team can easily come out and say that the prosecution team is "assuming" Zimmeran was the aggressor. A friend told me a week ago that he thinks that the prosecution and the defense teams are negotiating behind closed doors, to downgrade the charges to manslaughter instead of second degree murder, because the prosecution doesn't have a solid enough case to win. I doubted what he said, because this case will got to trial come hell or high water. The outcome is still up in the air.