George Zimmerman NOT Guilty!!!
I was out late last night when a friend gave me the text of the verdict. I turned on the radio in my truck, NOT GUILTY. I am so glad this trial is over!! I wasn't shocked by the verdict. I knew Friday that he prosecution was in trouble, when they were bringing up charging Zimmerman with the absurd charge of "felony child abuse". They were clearly grasping at straws, because they couldn't make their case for second degree murder for Zimmerman. Even Saturday morning, the jury had to ask about whether Zimmerman's shooting of Martin even constituted manslaughter.There are no winners in this. Yes George Zimmerman was found not guilty based on the evidence, but where can he go to get his reputation back after the media has pretty much destroyed it? I feel for the Martin family. They handled this whole ordeal with class and dignity. All they wanted was justice for the loss of their son. As for Trayvon Martin himself., he had a checkered past, but that wasn't what the trial was about. This was about a 17 year old who just wanted to go home after going to the store but never made it. I am to a point glad that the race agitators are so pissed off today. It has been better then watching Comedy Central.
The national media who made this local case into a national racially divisive issue are beside themselves.
The celebrities have weighed in on their displeasure of the verdict after taking a few moments away from the cocaine trays.
I'm going to be doing a few stories over the next few days on the reactions by the far out left just for amusement value. The Internet tough guys are already issuing death threats to the jurors and their kids. So much for civility and decency I know. The NAACP went crying to Obama and Eric Holder after the verdict, and now the Justice Department is "reviewing the case". This just goes to prove that this trial wasn't about the facts being proven in the court of law, this trial was suppose to have been about the lynching of Zimmerman in the court of law facts be dammed. Obama has once again weighed in by saying battle gun violence to honor Travyon Martin. His hometown of Chicago has so many murders a day, it's starting to resemble Iraq. I've never heard him talk about the honoring the dead in Chicago or in other cities where the murdering of young black males is such a problem and common. Anyways, thank goodness this whole media orchestrated divisive issue is finished, well until the next one.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 6:52 PM
11 Comments:
CB;"Obama has once again weighed in by saying battle gun violence to honor Travyon Martin.".
I really don't think President Obama called a press conference just to talk about Trayvon Martin. I believe he was "ASKED QUESTIONS", to which he gave answers. You might not like his responses, but that would be your problem...right?
CB;"I've never heard him talk about the honoring the dead in Chicago or in other cities where the murdering of young black males is such a problem and common".
That's because you hear what you want to hear Tyrone. Just a few months ago President Obama went to Chicago specifically to talk about gun violence. I know you remember when the first lady attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, the slain teenager who had attended the inauguration. Do you also remember how Rush Limbaugh attacked her saying;
"she has a chip on her shoulder about this country, and is doing a disservice to the country by drawing a comparison between herself and Pendleton".
You often hear only want you what to hear....
p allen "
I really don't think President Obama called a press conference just to talk about Trayvon Martin. I believe he was "ASKED QUESTIONS", to which he gave answers. You might not like his responses, but that would be your problem...right?"
Here's response that Obama should have made when asked the question
Obama: The legal process has taken it's course.
How hard was that?
p allen "That's because you hear what you want to hear Tyrone. Just a few months ago President Obama went to Chicago specifically to talk about gun violence. I know you remember when the first lady attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, the slain teenager who had attended the inauguration. Do you also remember how Rush Limbaugh attacked her saying;"
WOW, Obama went to Chicago once to talk about gun violence!! How many times did he reference Sandy Hook after the shootings there? Now lets do a ratio of how many times Obama has mentioned shootings in Chicago vs calling for the end of "gun violence" in reference to Sandy Hook. Obama went has far as to hand over his weekly radio address to one of the mothers who's child was killed in the Sandy Hook shootings. Can you give me an example of when Obama did that for a mother who lost her child to gun violence in Chicago?
If I am wrong, correct me.
p allen ". I know you remember when the first lady attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, the slain teenager who had attended the inauguration. Do you also remember how Rush Limbaugh attacked her saying;"she has a chip on her shoulder about this country, and is doing a disservice to the country by drawing a comparison between herself and Pendleton".You often hear only want you what to hear...."
No allen, I only know what I learn and process as fact. You left out that fact that Limbaugh from day one has always said that Michelle Obama has a chip on her shoulder dating back to when she said she was only proud of her country when her husband won the Democratic nomination. It actually goes back further when she was speaking to a college in South Carolina about Americans being ignorant and don't like to change.
Michelle Obama January 23rd 2008
"We don't like being pushed outside of our comfort zones. You know it right here on this campus. You know people sitting at different tables, y'all living in different dorms. I was there. Y'all not talking to each another, taking advantage of the fact that you're in this diverse community because sometimes it's easier to hold onto your own stereotypes and misconceptions, it makes you feel justified in your ignorance. That's America. So the challenge for us is, are we ready for change?
Sounds like a woman with a chip on her shoulder to me allen. Using her words not mine.
So what Limbaugh said about Michelle PREDATES Hadiya Pendleton funeral. FURTHERMORE!!! The only reason why Michelle attended the funeral is because Hadiya Pendleton is from the Obama's hometown of CHICAGO and that she was apart of Barack's inauguration. I'm very observant allen. I see what is right in font of me.
CB;"WOW, Obama went to Chicago once to talk about gun violence!! ".
Here one from 2012.
Another from 2012.
Even though the Brady Center gave him an F, here's Senator Obama in 2007.
CB;"You left out that fact that Limbaugh from day one has always said that Michelle Obama has a chip on her shoulder dating back to when she said she was only proud of her country when her husband won the Democratic nomination".
What does that have to do with attending the funeral of a slain teenager? A teenager from her home town. A teenager that had attended the inauguration. A teenager "Limbaugh" didn't even know. There was no political event...it was a FUNERAL!
See Tyrone, I told you you'd defend Limbaughs stupidity no matter how stupid his comments are.
CB;"So what Limbaugh said about Michelle PREDATES Hadiya Pendleton funeral".
PRECISELY!!! So how does her attendance of a funeral relate to "having a chip on her shoulder???" Does she have a chip on her shoulder because a teenage girl was killed? Is it because she hates funerals? Is it because she's from Chicago? Really Tyrone... where's the beef????
Here's something you can't possibly explain; For the sake of the argument, let's say Michelle Obama does have a chip on her shoulder. What does Michelle Obama's comments about how she has a chip on her shoulder, relate to her attending a funeral of a slain teenager from her home town? How is the life and death of Hadiya Pendleton relevant to Michelle Obama's "chip on her shoulder?"
The only explanation for such stupidity, would be even more stupidity! I don't think you could chastise Limbaugh if you tried.
Like you Tyrone, I too am tired of this. Far as I’m concerned, and in my opinion, the media and the racial agitators never gave a damn about Trayvon Martin to begin with. All they were looking to do was just to stir up the pot just for ratings and attention in the media spotlight.
Every time the media interjects race into a situation, people involved wound up getting hurt. Lives and careers are ruined and people get killed. Like what NBC did when they doctored Zimmerman’s 911 calls, I mentioned before about what KTLA Los Angeles did when they edited the Rodney King beating by the LAPD, which ironically, resulted in millions of dollars in property damage and 58 people killed and hundreds injured within the black neighborhood of Los Angeles. What was it for KTLA? A ratings boost and a local Emmy. I wonder if it was worth it?
Since Zimmerman has been acquitted, I would presume Martin supporters would go out and take their frustrations out on any white person they can find. Since there was no evidence of racism on Zimmerman’s behalf, and people wound up getting hurt of what the media and the racial agitators stirred up, they should be held accountable.
-Big Pop
Big Pop;"Since Zimmerman has been acquitted, I would presume Martin supporters would go out and take their frustrations out on any white person they can find".
You "PRESUME" supporters will attack whites?????????? YOU PRESUME???? You might as well say; "them niggers just can't control themselves!"
How dim-witted and ignorant are you Big Pop? It's not incumbent upon Martin supporters (Black people is what you meant) to riot and attack whites. It's incumbent upon the police and law officials to make sure "ALL" citizens are safe! So are you going to tell me something like; "they (the blacks) did it before, (ie; L.A. riots) so you "PRESUME" they're going to do it again?"
Then tell me, how callous and ignorant would it be if I said;
George Zimmerman has been set free. He was given his gun back so he can go out and hunt down a kill some more black boys. Hell,he did it once, I "PRESUME" he'll do it again.
The Martins, their attorney's, and many from the Civil Rights establishment has stated that they don't agree with the verdict, BUT THEY ACCEPT IT. No one from the directly connected with the Martin family has called for violence....NO ONE! For you to presume that "whites will be attacked" is "baiting the violence." It's nit-wits like you and Zimmerman that shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.
Allen-“You "PRESUME" supporters will attack whites?????????? YOU PRESUME????
So, my prediction was correct! In case you haven’t noticed there have been riots and attacks going down in Los Angeles and in Oakland and other parts of the country at this moment. In case you have forgotten, there have been random attacks of white people from black youths exclaiming “This one’s for Trayvon!” prior to the trial?
Allen-“You might as well say; "them niggers just can't control themselves!"
And you might as well say that, “them honkys/crackers/rednecks/the man is keeping us down!”
How dim-witted and ignorant are you Big Pop? It's not incumbent upon Martin supporters (Black people is what you meant) to riot and attack whites. It's incumbent upon the police and law officials to make sure "ALL" citizens are safe! So are you going to tell me something like; "they (the blacks) did it before, (ie; L.A. riots) so you "PRESUME" they're going to do it again?"
What is the majority of people who support Martin, Allen? Even in the liberal, capitol city Olympia there are whites, Asian and Hispanics showing support for Martin; only blacks make up the majority of the supports. Not only are they marching on the streets attacking Zimmerman, they are bad-mouthing the police. As for rioting and attacking whites, hell, they’re doing it again as we speak. So what’s it going to take for these (blacks) to not be seduced by the racial agitators and not to do it again Allen, whether they like the verdict or not? And since cops are there to make sure ALL citizens are safe, why is it not politically correct whenever a white cop does his job whenever it comes to dealing with a minority criminal? Why is it acceptable when the roles are reversed?
Allen-“Then tell me, how callous and ignorant would it be if I said: ‘George Zimmerman has been set free. He was given his gun back so he can go out and hunt down a kill some more black boys. Hell, he did it once, I "PRESUME" he'll do it again.”
Did you get that from a tweeter Allen, or is that how you really feel? If George Zimmerman takes his gun and kills another black teenager out of malice, I have no sympathy for someone like him. I also have no sympathy for the white old man in Milwaukee who gunned down a black 13-year-old in cold blood because he accused him for stealing his guns. I hope they throw the book at him and he’ll spend the rest of his life in prison. Because of they postponed the trial because of his alleged “illness”, as far as I’m concerned let him rot.
Allen-“The Martins, their attorney's, and many from the Civil Rights establishment has stated that they don't agree with the verdict, BUT THEY ACCEPT IT. No one from the directly connected with the Martin family has called for violence....NO ONE! For you to presume that "whites will be attacked" is "baiting the violence."
Those who are not connected, either they did not get the message, or they just don’t care, and are looking for excuse to go out and commit acts of violence. Did I mention that it’s going on in Oakland and Los Angeles and other parts of the country? As for the Civil Rights establishment, since when were Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson fit that category? Those two, the New Black Panther Party AND the media are the ones inciting it. If they would for once, stop speculating race was the factor in every crime that involves a black and white, there probably would not be any violence and distrust among the communities. Since you once said you do not have any respect for Sharpton and Jackson, what is stopping you from confronting them and their followers to prevent them from stirring up the pot?
Allen-“It's nit-wits like you and Zimmerman that shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.”
So, are you suggesting that I’d be carrying a gun because I’m “trigger happy?” I don’t like guns Allen, and I don’t own a one. And I did say it before, I will purchase a gun to protect myself and my family if I have to. I pray that I don’t have to use it to do serious harm or kill my attacker. What about the criminals who have illegal firearms in their possession. I concur, they are nit-wits and dangerous. Tell you what Allen, since you live in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in the country, and let’s say some young kid (white or black, doesn’t matter) attacks you out of the blue and you shoot him in self-defense. Are you just as much as a nit-wit like me and Zimmerman? More like a hypocrite! You kill a person, even in self-defense, you will have to live with it for the rest of your life.
As far as I’m concerned Allen, you’re just as ignorant as you claim as I am. But there is one thing that you and I have in common: we’re both human and we’re both American.
You see Allen, this is what Tyrone was getting at and this is what the media want: they’re inciting racism; turning against each other. The reason why black on white crime is not made national is supposedly, the media want to avoid a race war. Funny...they’re doing a great job for not posting them; they’re inciting a race war without it by broadcasting only white on black crimes.
Since they’re more “ concerned” about white on black crimes, they don’t seem to care about the young black men and women killing each other on the streets, namely in Obama’s home town of Chicago. What happened in Sanford, Florida was a tragedy; what’s happening in Chicago is an epidemic!
Big Pop;"So, my prediction was correct! In case you haven’t noticed there have been riots and attacks going down in Los Angeles and in Oakland and other parts of the country at this moment. In case you have forgotten, there have been random attacks of white people from black youths exclaiming “This one’s for Trayvon!” prior to the trial?".
You might be a callous dim-wit, but you are able to read and write. So I'll conclude that you're not a dumb retard.
Your prediction has a totally flawed premise. The idiots that rioted in L.A. are not indicative of the protests which were held all over the country.
In L.A., the vast majority of the mayhem has occurred in the Crenshaw district. If you're not familiar with Crenshaw, it's a gang infested section of the city. Fights and riots break out if someone sneezes to loud. Gangs don't need a "reason" to riot. All they need is an "idea" or a "thought."
The Black gang mentality is difficult for most whites to understand. From most of the things you write, I can clearly tell that you have no clue of the black gang culture (subculture), psychological, socioeconomic, sociocultural, and sociopsychological dimensions of the violence.
See if you can make sense of this.
There you have the blacks that are rioting. Living under the conditions which they live, rioting to them is like an annual family vacation is to you.
Big Pop;"And you might as well say that, “them honkys/crackers/rednecks/the man is keeping us down!".
What do you mean "US" white man?
Nobody keeps me "down." No one, white, black or whatever, has kept me "down." The "white man" is keeping me down is an excuse for not going out and getting what you want and need. Moreover, most blacks know that "the white man" can't keep us down. Hell, Affirmative Action stopped the white man from keeping us down. Ask Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas...
The point is this Big Pop... You wrote;
"I would presume Martin supporters would go out and take their frustrations out on any white person they can find".
You said "any white person they can find." OBVIOUSLY you meant BLACKS will attack whites. I m black, and would never even consider attacking white people over this verdict. I know for a FACT that THE VAST MAJORITY OF BLACK PEOPLE FEEL THE SAME WAY I DO! Sure, there are "some" idiots assholes, or whatever name you want to call them. YET THEY DO NOT REPRESENT THE VAST MAJORITY! I posted a link on another thread here that shows BLACKS, WHITES, ASIANS, HISPANICS marching together PEACEFULLY RIGHT HERE IN DETROIT! DETROIT OF ALL PLACES...DETROIT! Marching peacefully to protest what many (including myself) an unjust law.
The Black Panthers in Florida (all eight of them) posted an idiotic wanted poster around Sanford. If you want real "agitators" that's where you should look. In my opinion, they're just a bunch of harmless nit-wits looking for attention.
Big Pop;"Did you get that from a tweeter Allen, or is that how you really feel? If George Zimmerman takes his gun and kills another black teenager out of malice".
No. that question came directly from by "bag of tricks." I asked it to see if you could understand how "dumb" you assertion was that "you presume white people would be attacked." The fact is I would never say or imply such a thing. I can't get into Zimmermans mind, and neither could you get into the minds of "black people."
People like yourself and the Black Panthers are clouding the real issue. I clearly understand what the jury did in this case. However, the point and issue is THE LAW WHICH ALLOWS A MAN TO KILL A BOY AFTER FOLLOWING HIM, AND BE ACQUITTED BECAUSE HE GOT HIS ASS KICKED!
I think this gentleman said it best, though I wouldn't use the language he uses . . .
Rally In Akron, Ohio (Mississppi) For Trayvon Martin
Allen-"You might be a callous dim-wit, but you are able to read and write. So I'll conclude that you're not a dumb retard."
Aw, the feelings mutual, Allen.
Allen-"What do you mean "US" white man?"
Hey, you're the one who brought up the stereotypical notion by typing "them niggers just can't control themselves!". As for you to referring me as "white man", that remark is just as racist when a white person addresses a crowd blacks or any minority or an individual by using the term "you people". And if you're trying to get my goat, forget it.
Allen-"I can't get into Zimmermans mind, and neither could you get into the minds of "black people."
So, what do you suppose was going on in Martins mind when he was beating Zimmerman to the ground. What was going through Martin's mind when he referred to Zimmerman as "creepy-ass cracker"? I don't have to be black or a minority to know what it is like to be oppressed. Growing up, I've been bullied by my peers, singled out, and passed over for promotions whenever I was qualified for the position.
Allen-"People like yourself and the Black Panthers are clouding the real issue. I clearly understand what the jury did in this case."
Only difference between me and the New Black Panther Party is that I am not instigating anyone to go out and riot and wreck havoc and to kick every person's ass whom they feel fit to anyone who they feel "deserves it".
-Big Pop
Post a Comment
<< Home