Monday, December 28, 2009

Obama has a problem. Al Qaeda still exist even after Bush is gone.

Liberal pacifists almost got their wish. With George Bush no longer in the White House, returning to a pre 911 mindset should have been a piece of cake right? Obama gave his historic speech to the Muslim world in Cairo Egypt earlier this year. All should have been right as rain, guess again. The excuse by anti profiling and progressive pacifists that Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab acted alone can officially be trashed. Al Qaeda has claimed responsibility for the attempted bombing of flight 253. Do any of you know that this mean? This means that terrorism still exists in an Obama world, imagine that. The argument that was presented by the left is that "George Bush created more terrorists under his administration". Well with less then a month to go until the first anniversary of the Obama "error", what now will be the excuse among his most loyal supporters? Obama has done everything from telling Americans how gee golly nice Muslims really are to giving greetings to Muslims on their holidays such as Ramadan.



Oh yes, Obama has gone as far as to try and white wash America's Judah-Christian heritage away by claiming "We are no longer a mostly Christian nation".



So Obama and left have made concession after concession after concession. George Bush was just as guilty as Obama in this department. Every time I heard Bush claim that Islam is a religion of peace I wanted to throw a shoe at him myself. Time for a harsh reality check for Barry, liberals and neoconservatives alike. Al Qaeda could care less about Barack Obama and his outreach to the Muslim world. Al Qaeda is now more embolden then ever before. They sense that our country finally has the weak leadership in which they can do what it pleases. Our country was attacked on 911 by Al Qaeda, yet "the United States wasn't in Iraq or Afghanistan at the time. I know our country has people dumbed down enough to honestly believe that once or if our troops are pulled out of Afghanistan and Iraq, Al Qaeda and other basket case Islamic groups will just leave us alone in peace. The attempted Christmas day bombing is a further illustration that evil people with twisted minds can't be negotiated with or appeased. If Al Qaeda had the power to fly another airliner into a another American skyscraper, they would do it in a heartbeat. So we already know that airport screenings in our country are going to be increased for people who are not suspected terrorists. My question now along with others is this. Is Obama going to take action against Al Qaeda or will he merely just down play the entire incident like a typical pacifist liberal would do? I have a brilliant idea. Maybe Obama can invited Al Qaeda to the White House for next year's Ramadan Dinner function.

21 Comments:

Blogger John Lanier said...

You're wrong. Until America wakes up, Obama has no problem. On the other hand, America has two problems: Al Qaeda AND Obama.

11:14 PM  
Blogger plumpudding81 said...

Talk about being naive or very full of himself.
Does Obama honestly think the sun rises and sets with him?
Even I believed when Bush took office that Evil wasn't going to vanish. Bush actually had the guts to confront terrorists despite some of his errors(claiming Islam is a religion of peace one of his biggest blunders next to the amnesty bill.)

I guess to be a liberal is to be oblivious to very real threats! I understand that if someone threatens me and my loved ones with total annihilation the last thing I need to do is understand their motivations.

12:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And yet, granny will go to high interrogatin and cavity search in the airport, while the jolly muslim extremist terrorist will go in like nothing.

Welcome to the nwo.

2:08 AM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

Say whuuudddd? A near terrorist attack that was averted (by shear luck) and you're not supporting the president??? How much have you written about this situation thus far...2, 3 commentaries??

Yet, not one mention of the brave folks who helped to subdue the suspect. No mention that the president has condemned the attempt, as he promised his administration would seek out those who hatched the plot.

You do know that your actions are "appeasing the terrorists" don't you? When President Obama speaks, the terrorist respond to him in the same manner as you! Both conservatives and Al Qaeda hates the presidents foreign policy.

President Obama responded to this terror attempt in the exact same manner as GWB. Yet you choose to spout "treasonous" rhetoric, offering no support for your own country or the people who nearly died aboard flight 253.

Conservative have really stooped to the lowest level of hatred. You hate the president so much that you're willing to support terrorist against your own country.

5:22 AM  
Blogger johnt said...

Hey Tyrone. I found your blog courtesy of "The Old Jarhead" http://tartanmarine.blogspot.com

I like what you have to say man. Keep up the good work.

If you have not already, please spend some time at www.mises.org

8:35 AM  
Anonymous Thehick said...

Amen, Brother. It has been far easier for the left to blame the GOP (or conservatives or "Teabaggers" or whoever) rather than be a real leader and accept the blame. You have hit the nail on the head. Keep up the good fight!

I've added you to my blogroll with great pleasure.

8:58 AM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

John Lanier "You're wrong. Until America wakes up, Obama has no problem. On the other hand, America has two problems: Al Qaeda AND Obama."

The wake up alarm is going off on November 4th 2010 John. Al Qaeda is the external threat to America and Obama, Reid and Pelosi are the internal threat.

plumbpudding "Does Obama honestly think the sun rises and sets with him?"

Ah yes yes and yes. Sometimes I think Obama has constant nose bleeds because his head seem to always be elevated upwards plumpuddign. You can't really blame Obama for having a narcissistic complex. The guy has people kissing his rear end at every turn. No wonder he thinks he is god's gift to the world.

9:40 AM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

anonymous "And yet, granny will go to high interrogatin and cavity search in the airport, while the jolly muslim extremist terrorist will go in like nothing.
Welcome to the nwo."

lol, What makes it bad is that the terrorist suspect was allowed onto a cross Atlantic flight into America without even HAVING A PASSPORT!! All it took was another Muslim dressed in a three piece suit tell the Airline personal "we do this all the time"! The guy paid all cash had no passport and the idiots in Amsterdam thought nothing bad could come from this? Yet liberals in our country want us to emulate countries like Amsterdam? I DON'T THINK SO!

P Allen "Say whuuudddd? A near terrorist attack that was averted (by shear luck) and you're not supporting the president??? How much have you written about this situation thus far...2, 3 commentaries??"

You should give me credit allen, at least I didn't blame Obama for the near terrorist attack. THOUGH, it took him how many days to even address what almost happened on Christmas day allen? If the same scenario played out under Bush, the media and liberals would be saying how out of touch Bush was and not concerned about national security. Tell me I'm wrong allen.

p allen "Yet, not one mention of the brave folks who helped to subdue the suspect. No mention that the president has condemned the attempt, as he promised his administration would seek out those who hatched the plot."

You missed my original post allen. I wrote that the only reason why the Christmas Day attack didn't go off was due to the explosive not working and the terrorist being stopped so he couldn't have tried it again. The people who tackled the terrorist suspect and subdued him are heroes in my book no doubt.

p allen "
You do know that your actions are "appeasing the terrorists" don't you? When President Obama speaks, the terrorist respond to him in the same manner as you! Both conservatives and Al Qaeda hates the presidents foreign policy."

Answer me this allen. Why is Obama and his administration so scared to mention the word "war on terrorism"? Just answer that for all of us if you will. Why has Obama chose to use the words "contingency operation" instead allen? Al Qaeda is a "terrorist organization" correct"? Al Qaeda is in the business of committing "terrorist acts" correct? So why won't Obama use the words terrorists, terrorism or terrorist operations allen?

p allen "Conservative have really stooped to the lowest level of hatred. You hate the president so much that you're willing to support terrorist against your own country."

Put that crack pipe down allen. Who's stating support for terrorist organizations? It isn't conservatives who want to give terrorist suspect Miranda Rights. It isn't conservatives who are supporting terrorist groups in their efforts to destroy Israel. It isn't conservatives who called terrorists in Iraq "freedom fighters". No allen, it was LIBERALS who've done all of the above. Conservatives want to keep terrorists suspects in Gitmo, liberals want to bring them onto American soil and place them in Illinois. It is conservatives that don't mind waterboarding terrorist suspects in order to extract the information that could possibly save our citizens. It's liberals who care more about a person that wants to do our country harm then protecting their own fellow citizens. So what did you say again about being on the side of the terrorists allen?

10:00 AM  
Blogger RamblingMother said...

I am so glad I found your blog. Keep speaking truth! Maybe we will all wakeup!! At least I am praying that we will. Praying for lame duck in 2010!!

11:38 AM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"Answer me this allen. Why is Obama and his administration so scared to mention the word "war on terrorism"? Why has Obama chose to use the words "contingency operation" instead allen?.

Different president, different ideas and tactics. That's what the American people voted for. Did Bush #1 use the same tactics as Bush #2 when it came to Iraq?

Iraq has been, and still is a very unpopular war with a majority of the American people. By December 2006 64% of Americans polled said Iraq was a mistake.

Furthermore, who care's what the fight is "called" or named? Call it the "war on terror", a "contingency operation", or a "really big show"!!! They try to blow stuff up, we prevent it or stop them, find who plotted it, and issue out American justice, and the "really big show" continues....

3:08 PM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"Who's stating support for terrorist organizations?.

You are! If you don't support your own government against and enemy, you are supporting the enemy...THAT'S COMMON SENSE!!

This shows your support for the enemy;

"Obama, Reid and Pelosi are the internal threat".

"The enemy of my enemy, is my friend"
-Osama Bin Ladin-

CB;"It isn't conservatives who want to give terrorist suspect Miranda Rights".

Conservative's don't want to give "ANYONE" Miranda rights! A "suspected terrorist" and an actual "caught in the act" terrorist are two different things. Conservatives want to apply "guilt" to all Muslim suspects.

Tell me this, what does a conservative mean when they say, "oh, he's a Muslim"? Is being a Muslim a good thing, or a bad thing??

CB;"It isn't conservatives who are supporting terrorist groups in their efforts to destroy Israel".

Every American president since Truman has supported Israel. President Obama has pledged his support for Israel time and time again.

CB;"It isn't conservatives who called terrorists in Iraq "freedom fighters".

If Iraqi's are fighting "ANYONE" occupying their country, what would you call them? Conservatives call Iraqi's fighting in their own country "terrorist", right? Yet, who created the "Iraqi terrorist"??

CB;"It's liberals who care more about a person that wants to do our country harm then protecting their own fellow citizens".

I'll take that as another implication that you believe that your own president, "wants to do our country harm then protecting their own fellow citizens." So again, you are on the side of the terrorist because they want the exact same thing!!

However, I too have a "beef" with President Obama. I believe he's naive in his attempts to "reach across the aisle" to Republicans and conservatives. If I were in the presidents shoes, I wouldn't trust any conservative. Conservatives have shown that they're no different than the terrorist!

5:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the longest time I thought that Allen was actually a smart liberal, getting some good jabs in on Tyrone.

No longer.

He has clearly shown to be a kool-aid drinking Dailykos nut. A liberal equivalent of a "birther."

Tyrone, don't even waste your time responding to him anymore.

7:12 PM  
Blogger DarkStar said...

Yawn....

OK, Tyrone. Did you miss this missile attack against Yemen about 1 1/2 weeks ago?

10:33 PM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

rambling mother "I am so glad I found your blog. Keep speaking truth! Maybe we will all wakeup!! At least I am praying that we will. Praying for lame duck in 2010!!"

I'm with you rambling mother. Lord hear our prayers!!

Darkstar "Yawn....

OK, Tyrone. Did you miss this missile attack against Yemen about 1 1/2 weeks ago?"

Yes I heard about it Darkstar, what is your point exactly? Between you and allen, can the two of you prove I said Obama wasn't doing anything to fight Al Qaeda? If the both of you reread my comments from my original commentary, you both would have read that I criticized Obama for being to cowardly or political correct in not acknowledge that there is a "war on terrorism" darkstar. Of course Obama is going to order attacks on the advise of his military generals. It would be political suicide for Obama if news got out that he wasn't confronting al qaeda don't you think so darskstar? Then again, one could make the obvious argument of why is Obama ordering the firing of missles in yemen when he doesn't believe that terrorist exist? Also Darkstar, you seriously need to try and get 8 hours of sleep. Just trying to help. :-)

p allen "For the longest time I thought that Allen was actually a smart liberal, getting some good jabs in on Tyrone.No longer."

The words smart + liberal together? lol, That is a tough one. To allen's credit,he represents the non fringe element of the liberal hordes. He's arguments are 90% based on emotion, half truths and talking Democrat talking points with about 10% of actual facts thrown in just to make his arguments appear to have a trace element of truth. lol See how allen responds to my next story, lets just say it will "hit close to home".

p allen "He has clearly shown to be a kool-aid drinking Dailykos nut. A liberal equivalent of a "birther."

I think allen is more of a devout Obama loyalist if anything else. He's a true believer of Barry to the core. In his eyes, Obama has no flaws and it is merely the vast right wing conspiracy that is constantly picking on Barry for no apparent reason. As a conservative, I went after people like Newt Ginrich, George Bush, David Brooks, Charles Kraumhammer, Arnold Schwarenegger, Christy Todd Whitman, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Chuck Hagel, Michael Steele, and the entire Republican National Committee and many other republicans and so called conservatives. I did it because I am not a loyalist and will call out anyone who I see as being wrong on an issue or deed. Allen is beside being an Obama loyalist he is a true blue, blue dog democrat to his bones.

p allen "Tyrone, don't even waste your time responding to him anymore."

lol, I can't do that. Allen's contrasting views just amplifies and validates my own views as being correct. Conservatives should always embrace our misguided liberal friends and at best try and help them to see the error of their ways. :-) If that fails, then we just debate them to help show people on the ideological fence why liberalism is messed up.

11:50 PM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

p allen "CB;"Who's stating support for terrorist organizations?.
p allen "You are! If you don't support your own government against and enemy, you are supporting the enemy...THAT'S COMMON SENSE!!"

OH PLEASE ALLEN!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where was the left's support for Bush during the war in Iraq and Afghanistan? You liberals once again called the terrorists in iraq FREEDOM FIGHTERS!!! FREEDOM FIGHTERS!! The scum that planted roadside bombs that killed and maimed our troops were called by your PALS allen FREEDOM FIGHTERS!! Do you really want to go there, we can! For every soldier that was killed on a daily basis in Iraq, your liberal pals never once blamed the people who took up arms against our soldiers, NOT ONCE!! The only person liberals blamed WAS BUSH!!! Soldiers tried to befriend Iraqis as they were being killed by them, and liberals blamed BUSH!! Tell me I'm wrong allen,
Who was the American liberal who defended Saddam Hussein in his trail Allen? The role of liberals when it comes to supporting our country in the time of war is very weak. Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't it liberals who spat on our soldiers as they returned home from Vietnam? Wasn't it liberals like Jane Fonda that provided comfort and aid to the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War? Wasn't it John Kerry who accused our soldiers and his own fellow soldiers of committing war crimes? Isn't it liberals who call soldiers "mercenaries, storm troopers, baby killers, war mongers" etc. So once again I will repeat allen, do you really want to go there? You can't provide one quote in which a non muslim American conservative ever stated one drop of support for Islamic terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda allen.

12:11 AM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

p allen "this shows your support for the enemy"
p allen quoting me"Obama, Reid and Pelosi are the internal threat".

So you are saying that Obama pelosi and Reid aren't internal threats to our county? Funny but according to the polls allen, Most of Americans are on my side in believing Obama, Pelosi and Reid are an internal threat to America. You need to read the news more. Most people in America do not want the legislation that liberals are pedaling allen. Sorry that the truth hurts, but it is still the truth. If liberals weren't a threat to our country, the legislation and ideology presented by liberals would be welcomely embrace, BUT IT'S BEING REJECTED. Why is that allen. Americans for the most part do not want Obama care, liberals in congress can care less, they are doing it for their liberal icon Teddy Kennedy. Once the elected class start ignoring and having contempt for their electorates, then yes they HAVE BECOME AN INTERNAL THREAT to this country allen.


p allen "The enemy of my enemy, is my friend"-Osama Bin Ladin-"

Then using your logic then allen, Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladden were friends of liberals because they both hated Bush and so did liberals. Want to try again?

p allen "Conservative's don't want to give "ANYONE" Miranda rights! A "suspected terrorist" and an actual "caught in the act" terrorist are two different things. Conservatives want to apply "guilt" to all Muslim suspects."

Right allen, just tell everybody with a straight face that the terrorist suspects won't have the same constitutional rights that we have on American soil.

p allen "Tell me this, what does a conservative mean when they say, "oh, he's a Muslim"? Is being a Muslim a good thing, or a bad thing??"

It's neither good nor bad. If I see a man walking down the street wearing a yamaka,my first thought is that he is jewish and I go about my way. I think nothing of it. I know where you are going allen. You are trying to make an issue about making a stereotypical argument against Muslims by conservatives. The reality is that if profiling and investigative means were used in Amsterdam, the terrorist would have been stopped in Amsterdam and never allowed to board the plane. The population doesn't have to fear non muslims trying to blow up planes allen. That is what you are missing. Are all Muslims suicide bombers?No they aren't. But they exist. Putting ones life in jeopardy for the sake of showing tolerance is stupid.

p

12:46 AM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

allen "Every American president since Truman has supported Israel. President Obama has pledged his support for Israel time and time again."

Some presidents claimed to support Israel while others merely gave lip service of their support. Have you checked the polls of Obama support among Israelis allen? He's support is at 6% Most Israelis believe he supports the Palestinians not them.

p allen quiting me CB;"It isn't conservatives who called terrorists in Iraq "freedom fighters".
p allen "If Iraqi's are fighting "ANYONE" occupying their country, what would you call them? Conservatives call Iraqi's fighting in their own country "terrorist", right? Yet, who created the "Iraqi terrorist"??

Out of 25 million Iraqis, less then 10% of 1% fought American soldiers. Many of the "freedom fighters" came from OTHER NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES. Since Al Qaeda was also in Iraq fighting our soldiers, you know you just validated them fighting our troops don't you allen? You proved my point.

p allen "CB;"It's liberals who care more about a person that wants to do our country harm then protecting their own fellow citizens".

p allen "I'll take that as another implication that you believe that your own president, "wants to do our country harm then protecting their own fellow citizens." So again, you are on the side of the terrorist because they want the exact same thing!!"

You tell me allen. It was Obama who sat in a hate filled church for twenty years listening to his spiritual mentor trash this country at every turn correct? Obama grew up and associate throughout his life with anti American radicals. So once again, you tell me allen. Out of the last 4 presidents from Reagan to Bush 43, none of them had the same backgrounds of associating with anti American radicals like Obama has.

p allen "However, I too have a "beef" with President Obama. I believe he's naive in his attempts to "reach across the aisle" to Republicans and conservatives. If I were in the presidents shoes, I wouldn't trust any conservative. Conservatives have shown that they're no different than the terrorist!"

Reach across the aisle? Obama's version of reaching across the aisle is "REPUBLICANS DO WHAT I SAY". It's Democrats who shut out Republicans on the health care legislation allen. Both the house and senate bills were done behind CLOSED DOORS BY DEMOCRATS. I know you are factually challenged but come on. Democrats own probably the most hated piece of legislation every created in congress. Think about your words for a moment allen. You criticize republicans for not going along with Obama. Wasn't it Democrats who have blamed Republicans for everything bad in America? So if that is true,

"why would Obama want support from a party he claims caused all the mess under the last eight years to begin with"?

12:46 AM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"For the longest time I thought that Allen was actually a smart liberal, getting some good jabs in on Tyrone.
No longer.
He has clearly shown to be a kool-aid drinking Dailykos nut. A liberal equivalent of a "birther."
Tyrone, don't even waste your time responding to him anymore"
.

First off Anon, I don't consider myself a "librul." It's others that view me, my idea's, and my opinions in that vane. Actually I'm socially conservative in many of my views, and ideologically liberal in others.

If at one time you thought I was "smart", thank you...I'll take that as a compliment! If you no longer think so, I can only respond with an, "ohh well..."

One thing I know about myself is that I'm fairly consistent in my views. That being said, obviously there's something I've said over the past few post's that has changed your opinion about me. So something I said "ticked you off."

Here's the deal Anon... If you don't want to read or respond to my post's, you don't have to! You can ignore me on this site. I can assure you that you won't be alone. However, I must remind you that I post here at the grace of the host, Tyrone. I would never suggest to him or anyone else that they "not" respond to you.

Therefore I suggest (with all due respect) that you get over it and engage in spirited debate, or join those who ignore what I write. I can handle it either way...

1:06 AM  
Blogger DarkStar said...

Yes I heard about it Darkstar, what is your point exactly?

You wrote: Time for a harsh reality check for Barry, liberals and neoconservatives alike. Al Qaeda could care less about Barack Obama and his outreach to the Muslim world. Al Qaeda is now more embolden then ever before. They sense that our country finally has the weak leadership in which they can do what it pleases.

It seems that Obama is doing something, something you refuse to acknowledge.

11:44 AM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"Out of 25 million Iraqis, less then 10% of 1% fought American soldiers. Many of the "freedom fighters" came from OTHER NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES".

WHHHHAAAAAT???? Do you ever think for yourself Tyrone??

The "less then 10% of 1%" numbers makes good political propaganda, but doesn't make SENSE!!! What you're saying is that throughout the war 90% of the country was safe for American soldiers??? No need for a "green-zone"...ehhhh?

You're implying that "foreign insurgents" have taken over Iraq and outnumber native born Iraqi's? BULL$#*T!!

The so-called "Iraqi insurgency" is made up of several different groups. Immediately after the invasion the very first "insurgency" group identified by the coalition forces were the Ba'athists (supported of Saddam Hussein) and Iraqi nationalists, ALL IRAQI'S!!! THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE SO-CALLED INSURGENTS ARE CITIZENS OF IRAQ.

About 65% of the Iraqi population (a majority) is Shi'ite. The Shiite's have made it no secret that they want the Americans out of Iraq. Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has a 50,000 + paramilitary force (The Mahdi Army) that fought against U.S. and Iraqi security forces.

In October 2008 over 300,000 Iraqi's marched in Sadr City protesting the American occupation.

Global Security.org puts the number of foreign fighters in Iraq at no more than 5,000, and that doesn't imply that they all are operating together, or at the same time.

More than 4000 Americans have been killed, and over 30,000 wounded in Iraq since 2003. Thus, according to you, and your estimates of the "foreign insurgency", the 100,000 strong U.S. forces were literally getting their "butts kicked" by a very small number of foreign fighters.....right???

Your numbers are WRONG!

1:59 PM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"Al Qaeda is now more embolden then ever before. They sense that our country finally has the weak leadership in which they can do what it pleases".

So, what was Al Qaeda thinking on, and prior to, Sept. 11, 2001??

What you fail to realize Tyrone is that conservatives and Republicans have stooped even lower in their attacks on the presidents (and America's efforts) against terrorism.

I didn't have a problem with the congressman calling the president a liar...it's where he did it that's shameful. I said many times that if you have a "beef" with the presidents policies, attack away, as long as you don't go racial or personal. Hell, I still to this date believe that Bush lied about the WMD's and his reasons for going into Iraq.

The problem I have is the sudden and eerily suspicious claims that the president would willfully or carelessly allow an attack to occur. Statements such as, "Obama, Reid and Pelosi are the internal threat" and, "they [Al Qaeda] sense that our country finally has the weak leadership" can only encourage a terrorist's plans.

Lets say you're part of an organization. Now let's say that someone, or a group of individuals, felt that the organizations leader was "weak." So you go out and speak openly about it to other organizations. I guarantee you that those other organizations would believe you're plotting against your organizations leader to either bring him down, or have their organization assist you in taking down your leader.

Conservatives have already stated that they want the president to fail. Your hopes for domestic policy and political failure are all well and fine. The country has had domestic problems and rebounded many times before.

But when it comes to the lives of innocent people traveling on a plane, who have no interest in political bickering, YOU REALLY HAVE NO RIGHT TO TELL THEM; "THE PRESIDENT IS WEAK, SO IT'S HIS FAULT IF YOUR PLANE GET BLOWN UP"!!

My point in all of this is the Conservatives and Republicans claim that a president of the United States is "weak" against a foreign threat or attacks. Basically it's CHEAP POLITICAL POSTURING!!!

During the Bush years those on the right made all kinds of claims that the left were "terrorist sympathizers" and "terrorist appeasers."

Yet, the same folks on the right that made those claims are now attempting to broadcast to the same terror organizations that, "our president is weak, he won't come after you", and "you can attack us our president doesn't care."

Did you know that the same people who planned the attack on flight 253 were released by the BUSH ADMINISTRATION in November 2007???

Yet, I'm not going to cast blame nor throw around stupid accusations. The terrorist are the ones to blame. They found a sucker distraught and dumb enough to blow himself up along with innocent people in an attempt to prove a meaningless point.

11:02 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home