You are Trayvon? There were countless other Trayvons also long before you. Do you remember them?
Black on black violence is as common as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west. Some may not like what I said, but I can't ignore the facts. They are what they are. It's a sad comment for me to have to make as a black man. Eric Holder said that Americans are cowards when it comes to the issue of race. At least I can say that I am not a coward on the issue unlike he and others are. I stated last month that the majority of black people who claim to want justice for Travyon Martin wouldn't give a dam about him "IF" George Zimmerman was a black guy. The truth is a you know what I know. I've been called out many times over that remark, yet the people who call me out can't poke holes into my statement, because they also know deep down I'm right. I wish I could find the total number of how many black 17 year old males were gunned down from the point when the Trayvon Martin story hit it's fevered pitch to where we are right now. This is the dirty not so secret to those who have the ability to see through BS to get to the truth. None of this hoopla is about Trayvon Martin. The hoodies the skittles and all the other crap is symbols of emotional garbage. Tryavon Martin lived for 17 years, and I would wager that the people who actually knew him, remembered him as being far more then just a symbolized hoodie, a bag of skittles and an iced tea. All of this ginned up misguided emotional outrage has more to do with their hatred for George Zimmerman then the fact that Trayvon was killed at all. Again I will ask the obvious, if George Zimmerman was black,would the nation have known about this shooting in Sanford Florida which happened back in February and would anyone beyond the immediate family and friends of Trayvon Martin really would care?Zo over at ZoNation made a point that even I didn't consider. We all know about Trayvon Martin of Sanford Florida thanks to the media and the race of the shooter (Hispanic not white), but did anyone ever stop to consider that there were countless other young black men who were named Trayvon who were also shot and killed?
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 3:22 PM
13 Comments:
You are doing the same thing your accusing other people of doing. You are writing storys about trayvon martin and you have a different point of view. The is no difference. You only have a opposing point of view. You claim one side they claim the other. You both are doing the same thing but from a different point of view.
You dont care either about how many trayvons are killed. You argue only to defend white people. Just like you said it. If you really cared you would write storys about people who want stop black on black shootings. You dont. You write about how white people feel about black on black shootings. You write about how eric holder or obama do nothing. But all you do is write about how white people feel and how they are effected. A few white people post on your blog and tell you how good you are and pat you on the head.
Your not exposing anything the white poeple dont already know.
Gerald T-
I like this guy, he's just as entertaining as you Tyrone.
Anyway, here is what I don't understand:
Anderson Cooper told the leader of the New Black Panther Party that Trayvon Martin's parents do not want them there, and they don't want his support. OK, so why are they still continuing to allow, and get support by the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, when they are one of the biggest race hustlers here in the country?
And I'm still confused with the mother, for first saying that her son's killing was an accident, then she recanted and said that what she meant to say that her son was in the neighborhood "by accident". Did she get the recanting advise from one of the black race hustlers?
Also, if the parents are against the NBPP, why are they allowing themselves and others to profit off of their son's slaying? Are they black eccentrics themselves but don't want to admit it?
You know, according to this guy, blacks eccentrics don't give a damn about black on black crime. The reason, no money to be made off of it; that includes black on white crime. That's why they're more interested in crimes that are white on black. ($KA-CHING!$) But what I notice is that when it comes to a police officer involved shooting of a black person, they go after the white cop. If it's a black cop who shot a black criminal, these race baiters don't bother with it.
When I notice a case of white on white crime, especially when there is a murder involved, the victim's family wants that person fried. Oh but wait, when it's black on white murder, and the victim's family wants the murderer fried, they get called racist.
Gerald T.-You argue only to defend white people."
Tyrone does not defend white people, nor does he defend black people; he is neutral on the subjects. How many times does he have to tell you that he reports what the politically correct media would not report? It would be apparent that you do not want to see or hear any of that.
"If you really cared you would write storys about people who want stop black on black shootings."
Have you noticed that those who speak out against black on black crime get condemned by some members in the black community. There are numerous blacks, including Tyrone who do take a take a stand against black on black crime and all he does is get shut out and called a "sellout".
If you want to stop black on black crime Gerald, you speak out, and give don't into this political correctness garbage or have someone of your peers talk you down. If they call you a "sellout", fine, because you finally took a stand against what's happening in the black community. If anyone sold out the black community, it's the race hustlers. As I said before, they don't give a damn about anyone in the black community but themselves.
To Gerald T- hear is an excerpt from August 8, 2009 "Etnically Speaking" article by Larry Meeks as to why black leaders don't take an interest to black on black crime. Maybe this well open your eyes.
"It is no secret that 95 percent of crimes that happen to blacks are committed by other blacks.
When the police arrest blacks for crimes, the people who are being protected the most are other blacks. Said another way, crimes against blacks could be reduced 95 percent if blacks stopped preying on one another, and when black criminals are arrested, the police should be praised for protecting the black community.
If black leaders said this, they would lose their following. They maintain their standing by taking information and twisting it so blacks believe they are not responsible.
That is why people like Bill Cosby must be discredited. If Cosby's opinion prevailed, the black leadership would be destroyed.
Black leaders have become famous and wealthy by making certain people believe they are hopeless without their leadership.
FYI-Larry Meeks is a black man.
BRAVO WUBA
Gerald T "You are doing the same thing your accusing other people of doing. You are writing storys about trayvon martin and you have a different point of view. The is no difference. You only have a opposing point of view. You claim one side they claim the other. You both are doing the same thing but from a different point of view. ":
Who side am I taking Gerald? Once again, stop reading what you want to read and read what I am actually saying. I have taken a different point of view only to balance out what the media is reporting. I've said countless that hopefully the facts will come out in the trial. You don't like it that I am not condemning George Zimmerman Gerald. For you, for me to be fair is coming across as me being pro Zimmerman.
Gerald T"You dont care either about how many trayvons are killed. You argue only to defend white people. Just like you said it. If you really cared you would write storys about people who want stop black on black shootings. You dont. You write about how white people feel about black on black shootings. You write about how eric holder or obama do nothing. But all you do is write about how white people feel and how they are effected. A few white people post on your blog and tell you how good you are and pat you on the head. "
Well brain drain, let me refresh your memory. I had a 17 year old cousin who was shot and killed. They never found the killer and his name was merely a 15 second segment on the nightly news. So to say that I don't care is beyond stupid on your part.I've also had a very close immediate family member who was stabbed and died when I was five years old. So stick your head in a bucket of cold water Gerald and don't come up for air. I know more about this topic then you ever will. You can't dispute what I say. Black on black murder doesn't get national attention. Name a news story in which a black person was killed by another black person and it became a national story of protest and outrage. Let's see who knows what they are talking about Gerald.
anon "Anderson Cooper told the leader of the New Black Panther Party that Trayvon Martin's parents do not want them there, and they don't want his support. OK, so why are they still continuing to allow, and get support by the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, when they are one of the biggest race hustlers here in the country?"
Simple, because Trayvon's parents believe that Sharpton can bring attention to a story that will be in the positive as opposed to the New Black Panthers which will not covered by the national media. The nataion media so how believes Sharpton is a "black leader", so whenever he speaks the media follows him.
anon "Have you noticed that those who speak out against black on black crime get condemned by some members in the black community. There are numerous blacks, including Tyrone who do take a take a stand against black on black crime and all he does is get shut out and called a "sellout"
Blacks who speak out against black on black violence never get the national spotlight attention nor even the local spotlight. Now if a noted black race hustler like Al or Jessse speaks out against a white on black or in this case an Hispanic on black, then the media cares it. Talking bad about the urban lifestyle that contributes to black on black crime is seen as a no no by young blacks. Black motivational speakers are seen as sellouts etc. I've never heard Sharpton, Jackson or other in the civil rights industry ever talk about empowerment among black youth, and I am sure I never will hear them say anything like that either.
Here's a hypothetical question:
Since we asked the question as to what if the roles were reversed, we assume that the public could care less, or the black race hustlers would there support the stand your ground law.
Now let's suppose, instead of Zimmerman shooting Martin, according to some accounts it was Martin on top of Zimmerman bashing his head into the pavement. Suppose if Martin were to cave Zimmerman's skull in killing him in the process. Would the public care less? Or would the black race hustlers come to his defense and still support the stand your ground law.
Kawanio che Keeteru!
You should make an adequate comparison. Those other "Trayvon Martins" resulted in convictions and incarcerations of their killers when caught. The three black men shot in Tulsa didn't result in protests, etc. because their "white" (one mixed with Amerindian) killers are being prosecuted. No protests for the black man beaten and run over by the truck because the racists who killed him are being prosecuted.
This straw man argument of citing other black on black murders is faulty.
Have you defended John McNeil who is serving a life sentence for standing his ground in Georgia?
Also, 84% of white people who are killed are killed by other whites, yet whenever a black person kills a white person, The Right goes crazy.
"Would the public care less? Or would the black race hustlers come to his defense and still support the stand your ground law."
No one came to John McNeil's defense and he is serving a life sentence for doing what Zimmerman did against an ARMED attacker after giving a warning shot.
"Anonymous said...
You should make an adequate comparison. Those other "Trayvon Martins" resulted in convictions and incarcerations of their killers when caught. The three black men shot in Tulsa didn't result in protests, etc. because their "white" (one mixed with Amerindian) killers are being prosecuted. No protests for the black man beaten and run over by the truck because the racists who killed him are being prosecuted.
This straw man argument of citing other black on black murders is faulty.
Have you defended John McNeil who is serving a life sentence for standing his ground in Georgia?
Also, 84% of white people who are killed are killed by other whites, yet whenever a black person kills a white person, The Right goes crazy."
84% of white people who are killed are killed by other whites, eh? Care you cite your source?
According to the U.S. census, approximately 80% of the United States' population is "white" whereas just 12% of the population is "black". Wouldn't it be reasonable to conclude that if blacks and whites were to commit an equivalent amount of crimes that 80% of jail populations would be "white"? Well, that's not the case; in fact, it's quite the opposite. Black males make up a larger percent of jail populations than white males (35% compared to 34%).
Quit trying to hide from the truth that is inconvenient to your side of the argument: blacks commit more crimes than whites, including those committed upon other blacks, by a large margin.
Post a Comment
<< Home