Democratic Strategist Bob Beckel finally admitted that liberalism has failed blacks in America.
People who follow politics know that Bob Beckel is a die hard liberal Democrat. He's not a moderate nor a conservative. He was the campaign manager for Walter Mondal's failed 1984 Presidential campaign. He has worked for several Democratic campaigns over the years as well as being a liberal commentator on shows like the Fox News Channel "The Five" and CNN's "Crossfire". Well a week ago, Bob Beckel must have been off his medication, because he said something that had to have been heard in order to have been believed. He basically admitted as a liberal that liberalism has failed blacks in America. Beckel's revelation happened on "The Five". The panel was originally taking about the kook Chris Matthews apologizing on behalf of white people to blacks, but Bob took it to the next level.
I wonder if any of Beckel's friends are still going to invite him to their cocktail parties after his political come to Jesus revelation in admitting the obvious of the failure and poison of liberalism on the black community? Liberals spew to me from time to time that "I'm not voting in my best interest". I usually respond that since I am not dependent on government nor do I see capitalism as a problem, so I am most certainly am voting in my best interests. Warehousing blacks in project housing was never going to lead to the economic upward mobility of blacks nor was giving black mothers more food stamp aid for every child they had. Demanding that the father not be in the home in order for provide for his kids was just plain wrong. I really do not understand how any progressive polices are designed to help not only blacks but any racial group excel economically in America. If anything, it just makes more people dependent upon government and financially less well off due to those who work having to pay increasing amounts in taxes to support those who are dependent. At least I can say that a liberal finally told the truth about the ills of liberalism.
I wonder if any of Beckel's friends are still going to invite him to their cocktail parties after his political come to Jesus revelation in admitting the obvious of the failure and poison of liberalism on the black community? Liberals spew to me from time to time that "I'm not voting in my best interest". I usually respond that since I am not dependent on government nor do I see capitalism as a problem, so I am most certainly am voting in my best interests. Warehousing blacks in project housing was never going to lead to the economic upward mobility of blacks nor was giving black mothers more food stamp aid for every child they had. Demanding that the father not be in the home in order for provide for his kids was just plain wrong. I really do not understand how any progressive polices are designed to help not only blacks but any racial group excel economically in America. If anything, it just makes more people dependent upon government and financially less well off due to those who work having to pay increasing amounts in taxes to support those who are dependent. At least I can say that a liberal finally told the truth about the ills of liberalism.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 1:55 PM
23 Comments:
CB-"Bob Beckel must have been off his medication."
Well, Michael Savage did say that liberalism is a mental disorder. So, maybe someone did slipped some kind of pill in his coffee and he started to have a clear head on his shoulders and he felt good about himself. Lol!
-Big Pop
CB;"Warehousing blacks in project housing was never going to lead to the economic upward mobility of blacks nor was giving black mothers more food stamp aid for every child they had. Demanding that the father not be in the home in order for provide for his kids was just plain wrong".
Warehousing "people" in project housing was never a grand idea. Project housing began in the early 1930's with the intent of removing people from the squalor of run-down tenements and disease infected make shift slums. Over the years, the programs became a determent to many blacks.
Tyrone, since you're hung-up on, conservative vs. liberal policies, take into account that anything done by government prior to the 1960's (and somewhat after) was done by "Conservative Democrats" or "Liberal Republicans."
It's obvious that you don't know the history of your own home town, Baltimore.
"But the federal programs restricted them to segregated and economically depressed neighborhoods. By the mid-1930’s, 89% of Baltimore’s African-American population was confined to an area surrounding the downtown central business district.
From that point on, the Housing Authority of Baltimore City (HABC) basically ran two housing programs (and legally so), one African-American and one Caucasian".
The exact same policies were enacted here in Detroit, as well as other cities across the U.S.
And why is it when the word "welfare" is mentioned, conservative whites equate the term with "black people?" Statistically, the percentage of blacks and whites that receive government assistance are the same. (eg, whites=38.9 vs blacks=39.8) US Department of Health and Human Services Statistics.
Being that whites are 70 percent of the population, and blacks are 12 percent, in plain numbers, far, far, far more whites receive government assistance than blacks. White people collect 61 percent of welfare as opposed to the 33 percent black people collect. So to associate black people with welfare doesn't really make sense. Everyone I know associates the NBA with black players. It only makes sense because 77 percent of the players are black. So why is it that conservative whites associate welfare with blacks, when over 60 percent of the recipients are white?
Granted there is a disparity being that blacks are only 12 percent of the population. But the cause of the disparity isn't because black people are lazy and intentionally running to the dole. The disparity is because a higher percentage of blacks are poor. This is a statistic that has been a part of the American fabric since it's inception.
How sad that it had to take the collapse of a heavily Democrat run, once prosperous city such as Detroit to finally encourage a liberal like Beckel to admit what was visibly detectable to the naked eye regarding the abysmal state of present day, black America!
Sadly this epiphany will not permeate within the monetary-driven hollow minds of fellow liberals & full time race hustlers, Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson!
p allen "Tyrone, since you're hung-up on, conservative vs. liberal policies, take into account that anything done by government prior to the 1960's (and somewhat after) was done by "Conservative Democrats" or "Liberal Republicans."
Ah allen, whenever someone on the right says something and you feel that he or she can somehow discredit what I say, you can't wait to say "well so and so who is a conservative said this or that" so now I am the one hung on on the conservative vs liberal thing? lol classic as usual. Furthermore, Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" and the "War On Poverty"happened AFTER 1960, and he was a "Liberal Democrat". Now if lets say that conservative democrats created the projects, then why haven't liberal democrats pointed that out and apologized for what their conservative democrats did? In other words allen, it didn't happen as your imagination would want it to have. The public housing high rise projects as Beckel said was thought of as a solution for bringing equality in regards to the affordability of housing to minorities especially blacks in the inner cities and it backfired by incubating poverty and crime.
p allen "
"But the federal programs restricted them to segregated and economically depressed neighborhoods. By the mid-1930’s, 89% of Baltimore’s African-American population was confined to an area surrounding the downtown central business district.
From that point on, the Housing Authority of Baltimore City (HABC) basically ran two housing programs (and legally so), one African-American and one Caucasian"."
From the Baltimore Sun
"The high-rise projects that sprang up across the country in the 1950s and 1960s have been criticized as "warehouses for the poor" because they packed as many poor blacks into as small an area as possible."
Oh snap, I guess based on what you said about public housing being established in Baltimore during the 1930's, that would have meant that Nancy Pelosi's father Thomas D'Alsandro Jr must have been a racist conservative Democrat then, because he was a member of the Baltimore City Council from 1935-1938 and he was Mayor of Baltimore from 1947-1959. I guess I do know the history of my own city after all allen, how about that. I can't wait until we get to Detroit.
p allen "Being that whites are 70 percent of the population, and blacks are 12 percent, in plain numbers, far, far, far more whites receive government assistance than blacks. White people collect 61 percent of welfare as opposed to the 33 percent black people collect. So to associate black people with welfare doesn't really make sense. Everyone I know associates the NBA with black players. It only makes sense because 77 percent of the players are black. So why is it that conservative whites associate welfare with blacks, when over 60 percent of the recipients are white? "
Because you are looking at half the picture allen. Of course more whites are on public assistance then any other minority group, because in general numbers they are the majority, however when when you break down then numbers on percentages among the racial groups, blacks receive more welfare assistance based on race then whites. Its' the same argument that is made when it is reported that black unemployment is higher then whites even though there are more whites then blacks in the country. There are more black young males then white young males in prison even though there are more young white males in the country. It's easy to gloss over that.
anon "How sad that it had to take the collapse of a heavily Democrat run, once prosperous city such as Detroit to finally encourage a liberal like Beckel to admit what was visibly detectable to the naked eye regarding the abysmal state of present day, black America!"
Funny how the movie Robocop which was made back in the 80's told the future of Detroit well before it happened. Maybe OCP should have taken Detroit private after all.lol
Even though Detroit has become butt black eye of the nation and the poster child to how liberalism is like a cancer to metropolitan cities, Detroit isn't an isolated case and it won't be the last to find itself in dire ruins.
Chicago is having problems of it's own financially. My city of Baltimore is no exception. Democrat ruined cities such as Stockton California, San Bernardino California, Harrisburg Pennsylvania, Compton California didn't get the attention that Detroit received, simply because Detroit is a major well know Metropolitan city. Liberals wanted to make their beds with the municipal unions and this has been the end result, also combined with the quality of life issues that have forced people who could afford to leave to do so.
"Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" and the "War On Poverty"happened AFTER 1960, and he was a "Liberal Democrat"
What are you talking about bro? The scope of great society programs were modeled after FDR's "New Deal." Southern Democrats joined with republicans and formed the conservative coalition to oppose the legislation. The same coalition led by southern democrats wrote the Conservative Manifesto. Its the same principles that conservatives go by today. One of the key points the southern democrats wanted was States Rights. They wanted to keep Jim Crow laws in place. So theres the history of your conservative ideology.
"But the federal programs restricted them to segregated and economically depressed neighborhoods. By the mid-1930’s, 89% of Baltimore’s African-American population was confined to an area surrounding the downtown central business district."
Your timeline is off. Not only that, but the boundaries for the city changed as the city annexed surrounding areas. For example, North Ave. has that name because at one time, it was the northern boundary of the city.
And having family members and long term family friends who either "busted" neighborhoods or were children when they moved in with their parents who "busted" neighborhoods, it was legal segregation, not public housing, that was the reason for housing patterns.
anon ""Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" and the "War On Poverty"happened AFTER 1960, and he was a "Liberal Democrat"
What are you talking about bro? The scope of great society programs were modeled after FDR's "New Deal." Southern Democrats joined with republicans and formed the conservative coalition to oppose the legislation. The same coalition led by southern democrats wrote the Conservative Manifesto. Its the same principles that conservatives go by today. One of the key points the southern democrats wanted was States Rights. They wanted to keep Jim Crow laws in place. So theres the history of your conservative ideology. "
Interesting. So why would liberal northern republicans join with Southern conservative Democrats? The reality is that Republicans were vital to the 1964 Civil Rights Act passing, matter of fact if it wasn't for Illinois Senator Everett Dirksson, the bill wouldn't have even made it Lyndon' Johnson's desk. You did know that right? It wasn't republicans leading filibusters on the Senate floor to stop the bill, it was people like Senator Robert Byrd and Al Gore Sr. Don't think they were conservative Republicans. The Southern conservative Democrats of the Jim Crow era have mostly died off. It's laughable how some people are ignorant to the fact of what conservatism is. The childish idealism is that conservative must equate to racism or bigotry, merely because it is the opposition to liberalism. You didn't think that did you "bro"? The great illusion is to try to peg the Republican Party as a conservative party that come into existence after the great mythical party switch. The power structure of the GOP has never been controlled by conservatives, libertarians or constitutionalists, did you know that also "bro"?
CB;"however when when you break down then numbers on percentages among the racial groups, blacks receive more welfare assistance based on race then white".
Based on race? TYPICAL Conservative talking out both sides of your mouth!! Tyrone, you take in so much conservative propaganda, that even "YOU" don't realize what you're saying, when you say it! Isn't it conservatives that always note; "liberals always look at a situation through a racial lens, such as, the Trayvon Martin situation, the first black president, Affirmative Action quota's (ie. how many black per...)." Now you're using welfare statistics BASED ON RACE! It's obvious that once "liberal" Mitt Romney learned speak "conservative double-speak." He's continued talking out both sides of his mouth, now saying that; "I never said what I said about the 47 percent."
The statistic that you (as a black man) should espouse is the generational poverty that plagues many black communities. You never address the "FACT" that in America, blacks have been at the bottom of the economic scale since it's inception. I often ask this question;
Can anyone name a country that discriminated socially and economically against a race of it's own people, and over time that race of people (as a whole) became just as socially and economically prosperous as the people that discriminated against them?
CB;"Interesting. So why would liberal northern republicans join with Southern conservative Democrats? The reality is that Republicans were vital to the 1964 Civil Rights Act passing, matter of fact if it wasn't for Illinois Senator Everett Dirksson, the bill wouldn't have even made it Lyndon' Johnson's desk. You did know that right?".
It appears, that's not what Anon was talking about. Roosevelt's "New Deal" programs were stated in the 1930s'. The "Great Society" programs were indeed modeled after the New Deal plans. There were no federal Civil Rights Acts legislation during the 1930s' or 40's. Anon is apparently talking about what happened long before 1964.
Anon;"One of the key points the southern democrats wanted was States Rights. They wanted to keep Jim Crow laws in place. So theres the history of your conservative ideology".
So true, and right on!!!
Liberal policies hurt poor white people, they hurt poor black people, they hurt poor yellow people.
So maybe it's time to END them!
White liberals like Beck are filled with the constitutive lie of liberal compassion.
They are compassionate ONLY so long as they can keep the victims of their policies at a "safe" distance from themselves. In fact, THAT is the "reason" behind their policies... to keep "the other" trapped in a ghetto far, FAR away from the subsurb he lives in.... in a false "Economic Enpowerment Zone."
I'm loving your blog! I'll be a regular visitor from now on.
Best,
-- xPraetorius
Thersites ""White liberals like Beck are filled with the constitutive lie of liberal compassion."
P.T Burnum's famous quote was that "a sucker is born every minute". No truer words have ever been spoken then those. If a sucker can first be duped, then continuously strung along, then why would the con person ever have to change up the script in what he's telling that person? Liberals always talk about themselves as the most compassionate, but it is never exhibited. It's merely a bumper sticker slogan. They worship at the alter of big centralized government, but the government doesn't lift people out of poverty. Helping people to help themselves is compassion, but it's the opposite of liberalism. They have people suckered into believing that them being maintained in poverty through the assistance of government social programs is an example of their compassion, yet the money isn't coming from their own pockets and it's not even helping the people they claim they want to help.
Thersites "They are compassionate ONLY so long as they can keep the victims of their policies at a "safe" distance from themselves. In fact, THAT is the "reason" behind their policies... to keep "the other" trapped in a ghetto far, FAR away from the subsurb he lives in.... in a false "Economic Enpowerment Zone.""
Of course!!! That is why liberals so not want poor inner cities kids to have the same privileged education as their child. Failing and dangerous inner city public schools are good for the children of the masses,just don't let them hob nob with the children of the liberal elites in the private schools. Liberals can't even give a good enough excuse, because they know the real reasons. The first as I mentioned, and second the teacher unions make their money off as many kids in the public school system. I remember when the celebratards like Russel Simmons, Michael Moore and others ascended upon the Occupy Wall Sreet camps to get their photo op as if they actually supported what Occupy was about. Of course after they left in their high priced cars, they went back to their exclusive gated communities never to be seen rally for the cause again. Again, they frauds but as long as the con works, they'll continue with it.
p allen "Based on race? TYPICAL Conservative talking out both sides of your mouth!! Tyrone, you take in so much conservative propaganda, that even "YOU" don't realize what you're saying, when you say it! Isn't it conservatives that always note; "liberals always look at a situation through a racial lens,"
A few week ago when Republicans talked about wanting to split the food stamp program from the farm bill, who were the first ones and the most visible people to have spoken out against it allen? Black caucus member to GOP: ‘You all do not care about the 47 percent. Talk about can't have it both ways allen. If food stamps are mostly "a white thing" why would the Congressional Black Caucus say something about this? The GOP wasn't even talking about cutting food stamps, just creating two separate bills to vote on yet the CBC and not a white politician was the attack dog, why? The progressive double allen is text book. You all say out of one side of your mouths that more whites are on welfare and use food stamps then blacks, HOWEVER when the GOP even hints at cutting food stamps or other welfare subsidies, then the CBC or other progressives come out and cry about how a cut will hurt minorities the most.Why do Conservatives hate women, elderly, disabled, minorities and poor people ?
Typical allen "
"It has become very evident with every new law, bill and budget that the Tea Party conservatives propose that they are intentionally trying to hurt women, elderly, disabled, "MINORITIES" and the poor.
Their latest attack is in the Ryan Tea Party congress budget bill which cuts Medicare, Medicaid, student college grants,
"FOOD STAMPS", Health Care Reform and any program that helps these people to get out of poverty. This story is from the New York Times dated 1986! Yes, Ronald Reagan was president, and the progressive con job was still going then.
CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS CONTEND REAGAN BUDGET WILL HURT MINORITIES So what budget cuts would hurt minorites according to "civil rights leaders" allen? Well let's take a look.
Read all the rest of the ones they cited, but these two back up what I've been saying.
"Civil rights groups cited these areas most often
"Food stamps, which would be reduced from $12.6 billion this year to $12.3 billion next year, but would gradually rise to $13.3 billion in 1991."
* "Spending on child nutrition programs, which would be cut by $704 million next year, leaving $5.8 billion, and would gradually rise to $7 billion in 1991."
Yeah it is typical allen, but not for conservatives.
You're right! I never said liberals didn't do it. So now you get what I've been saying for years... most people, if not EVERY ONE in America looks at politic's, social order, economics, religion, etc..., through a racial lens. It's just that, even though you do it, you and your conservative cohorts refuse to admit it! (basically, lie about it)
However, you didn't address the point I made that conservatives particularly ignore. I'll say it again...
The statistic that you (as a black man) should espouse is the generational poverty that plagues many black communities. You never address the "FACT" that in America, blacks have been at the bottom of the economic scale since it's inception. I often ask this question;
Can anyone name a country that discriminated socially and economically against a race of it's own people, and over time that race of people (as a whole) became just as socially and economically prosperous as the people that discriminated against them? .
There has never been a time in this nations history when blacks "were not" at the bottom of the social economic scale. Although many blacks have broken the cycle of poverty, far to many have not.
Liberalism doesn't destroy cities like Detroit. Poverty does!
So Obama’s blackness trumps his failure to get black people back to work?
To trivialize the economic plight of so many Americans is disrespectful and shameful. It’s worse when that same group idolizes Obama and wills itself to believe he is virtually infallible.
But the CBC has chosen to become a national embarrassment — not only to their constituents, but to Congress as a whole. And that’s saying something.
Black Americans who continue to support political charlatans are complicit in their own socio-economic asphyxiation.
-Derryck Green, Project 21
A black conservative at http://AlfonzoRachel.com/ who puts himself out there with videos, got this thrown at him by a commentor:
“Zo, you are clearly a HOUSE NEGRO seeking White acceptance from these racist Neanderthals who do not care about the life of a Black person...Zimmerman INTENTIONALLY killed Trayvon Martin because he is a savage racist from the caves, and your little blog is giving non-Blacks the green light to kill Black people without repercussion...you are a defender of White supremacy, and a threat to Black Liberation, and should remove yourself from the Black community IMMEDIATELY, because you are NOT one of us, you are a SELLOUT and RACE TRAITOR.”
http://alfonzorachel.com/1647/white-people-and-the-curse-of-racism-trayvon-zimmerman-case-follow-up-vid
That commentor quoted above is scarred and hate filled and brain damaged, while Alfonzo is none of those NAMES IN CAPS he was called, but rather is giving a wake up call.
As in the byline of your blog, many black people need to wake up from being lemmings in the political realm. The Zimmerman - Martin case has exposed in raw living color the need for many black people in America to wake up. Wake up from what? From the aftermath of slavery and Jim Crow, from being superficial and naive, from the victim mentality. Wake up to face the family and moral problems within homes of many blacks. Wake up to the recent scourge of black flash mobs ripping off businesses. Wake up to many cases of black teenage boys gang brutalizing targets because they are white. To abandon the unkempt low class setbacks and “acting white” lies of culture. Bill Cosby and Ben Carson (who already have the money and status to afford to do so) got lambasted for trying to wake up black people. Race card playing also makes it near impossible to focus on changing those last vestiges where racism really does exist – and yes racism does exist (including white racism as seen in many blog comments) because parents and guardians keep passing it down to children, instead of letting the church of Christ blot it out of them. The growing pockets of conservative blacks are those who see what is happening and are trying to prevent Detroit, Michigan from multuplying. Tyrone, thanks for your blog, which is on the top tier of being relevant to our times.
Indigo "A black conservative at http://AlfonzoRachel.com/ who puts himself out there with videos, got this thrown at him by a commentor:"
Ignorant food attacking Zo" you are clearly a HOUSE NEGRO seeking White acceptance from these racist Neanderthals who do not care about the life of a Black person..."
Black and White progressives are ignorant to their own hypocrisy Indigo. They call blacks house Negro or Niggers but that is really what they see blacks as. They don't call them those names when blacks are on "their side". It when blacks form diverse points of views that aren't accepting to progressives then that is when their racist side comes to the surface. To progressives, blacks are "good Negroes" as long as they "know their role which means who to support."
Ignorant fool attacking Zo "Zimmerman INTENTIONALLY killed Trayvon Martin because he is a savage racist from the caves, and your little blog is giving non-Blacks the green light to kill Black people without repercussion..."
This this hallmark of progressive thought. No facts, irrational and delusional hate filled paranoia thinking. I bet this person doesn't even know that Zimmerman is Hispanic and not white, but he wouldn't care if the facts were presented to him. Furthermore, this person is a hypocrite, because I doubt 100% that he or she has ever spoken out about black on black murder. I've talked to Zo on Youtube several times. The guy is very articulate and analytical in his presentation, that is why the left has to use racial attacks against him, because they can't approach him with facts, because he'll destroy them since they have none.
Ignorant fool responding to Zo "you are a defender of White supremacy, and a threat to Black Liberation, and should remove yourself from the Black community IMMEDIATELY, because you are NOT one of us, you are a SELLOUT and RACE TRAITOR.”"
This is all again nothing but irrational, fringe hate, due merely because a black man dares to have a different view then this person. I've had plenty of progressives approach me like this, and I'm still laughing to this day. These people are brainwashed fools who should be felt pity for. Those who don't follow group collective thinking understands very clearly how the game works. In that entire piece Indigo, the person never gave once any factual nugget to legitimately discredit Zo, not one. It was just emotional hate towards Zo, yet he in his blinded rage didn't realize hat he was the one attacking Zo based on ideology and race. It is pointless to argue with fools, because they are what they are.
Indigo "That commentor quoted above is scarred and hate filled and brain damaged, while Alfonzo is none of those NAMES IN CAPS he was called, but rather is giving a wake up call."
If Zo was in a televised debate against that person, that person would do more damage to exposing to tearing down the illusion and myth about progressive tolerance then anything the conservative right could ever say.
Indigo "As in the byline of your blog, many black people need to wake up from being lemmings in the political realm. The Zimmerman - Martin case has exposed in raw living color the need for many black people in America to wake up. Wake up from what? From the aftermath of slavery and Jim Crow, from being superficial and naive, from the victim mentality. "
Most of black American are never going to wake up. Generational. embedded brainwashing is too deep. I thank god I never fell victim to it. To a rational minded person, he or her mind can be persuaded if the others facts are able to prove a flaw in the belief of the other person. Case in point, many blacks are calling for a boycott against Florida over it's stand your ground law, however the Trayvon Martin case was not even about Stand Your Ground. It was a self defense case.
-Derryck Green, Project 21 "
Black Americans who continue to support political charlatans are complicit in their own socio-economic asphyxiation."
You're right Derryck, but they will never get it. The only way they would ever suddenly care about the black unemployment rate is when the president is a registered Republican. This just shows that they really do not give a dam. They see the GOP an conservatives as their eternal boogeyman yet can't even explain how they are that, they are what Malcolm X called them, chumps.
D. Green;"Black Americans who continue to support political charlatans are complicit in their own socio-economic asphyxiation.".
Derryck Green, a member of the national advisory council of the Project 21 black leadership network, received a M.A. in Theological Studies from Fuller Theological Seminary and is currently pursuing his doctorate in ministry at Azusa Pacific University.
Impressive credentials. So you should be able to answer a few straight forward, very simple questions.
You say that Black Americans who support charlatans are "complicit in their own socio-economic asphyxiation." Question- how long have Blacks been asphyxiating? Did it recently begin? When has Black Americans (as a people) "not" been on the bottom of the socio-economic scale?
To the best of anyone's knowledge, Black Americans have always been at, or near the bottom of the socio-economic ladder. Over the past 20 years, even the Native American has began to break their constant cycle of poverty. Yet, black generational upper-mobility is slow at best.
Thank you ACM for your responses to my earlier post, all to which I agree. For more evidence that people have lost their sane minds, are the progressives that recently treated 40 year old Tawana Brawley like a rock star at a New Jersey fund raiser for her. Showing his disgust at their race baiting behavior is this article by black conservative Lloyd Marcus at:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/08/cmon_black_america_we_can_do_so_much_better.html
Here's two videos by the same man. I think it fits in, somewhat, what with what you guys are debating.
Black Men....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xmWk8SW7G4
The Florida Boycott Is stupid!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W30xJ_Veef4
Conservatives in American politics means lets keep the niggers in their place. Liberalism means lets keep the “kneegrows” in their place, but tell them we will treat them a little “better”. Let’s fool them with more “promises”. With these choices, I felt that the American black man only needed to choose which one to get eaten by; the liberal fox or the conservative wolf because both of them will eat him.
When it all boils down to it, I find both sides of the coin laughable. It is all about accepting responsiblity for your actions. It has nothing to do with your "party ties". Until more black americans realize this and "wake up" it'll continue.
Post a Comment
<< Home