Is Barack Obama proud of his support from the New Black Panther Party?
4-1-2008
I'll say it again. How can Barack Obama run his campaign as a "unifying" candidate when he is supported by the most "divisive" people and organizations in our country? Why is this question so hard for some people to answer? The New Black Panther Party is a copy cat group of the original Black Panthers. There is no releation between the two groups. The New Black Panthers tried to cause trouble in Durham North Carolina during the Duke Lacrosse episode. Once Crystal Gail Magnum was discovered to be a liar, members of the New Black Panthers were missing in giving an apology to the accused members of the Lacrosse Team. So why is Obama attracting this kind of support? The New Black Panthers fully support Jerimah Wright's position on America. So I guess it's only natural that they would also embrace Barack Obama as well. It's along the lines of "Birds of a feather flock together". Originally Barack Obama displayed on his website the support of the New Black Panther Party. Now let me ask another question. Why would a politician running for President of the United States display the support of a unabashedly racist and anti Semitic group as an endorsement? I can't see the logic in that. I seriously doubt that John McCain would display on his website support form the Klu Klux Klan or the Aryan Brotherhood. If the McCain campaign would have done that, naturally his campaign would be over in one thousandth of a nano second and rightfully so. Is there a double standard at play? Of course there is, and you all can stop laughing now,lol. When Trent Lott said some nice words about Strom Thurmond at Strom's 100th birthday party, Trent Lott was immediately branded as a racist due to his actions. I guess it was the "guilt by association" thing at work. With Obama, the rules of racial politics have changed. Of course the rules have always been created to favor Democrats, so that shouldn't come as some big surprise. Anyways, these are the people that Obama and his supporters are"proud"to display as an endoresment on their website.
I'll say it again. How can Barack Obama run his campaign as a "unifying" candidate when he is supported by the most "divisive" people and organizations in our country? Why is this question so hard for some people to answer? The New Black Panther Party is a copy cat group of the original Black Panthers. There is no releation between the two groups. The New Black Panthers tried to cause trouble in Durham North Carolina during the Duke Lacrosse episode. Once Crystal Gail Magnum was discovered to be a liar, members of the New Black Panthers were missing in giving an apology to the accused members of the Lacrosse Team. So why is Obama attracting this kind of support? The New Black Panthers fully support Jerimah Wright's position on America. So I guess it's only natural that they would also embrace Barack Obama as well. It's along the lines of "Birds of a feather flock together". Originally Barack Obama displayed on his website the support of the New Black Panther Party. Now let me ask another question. Why would a politician running for President of the United States display the support of a unabashedly racist and anti Semitic group as an endorsement? I can't see the logic in that. I seriously doubt that John McCain would display on his website support form the Klu Klux Klan or the Aryan Brotherhood. If the McCain campaign would have done that, naturally his campaign would be over in one thousandth of a nano second and rightfully so. Is there a double standard at play? Of course there is, and you all can stop laughing now,lol. When Trent Lott said some nice words about Strom Thurmond at Strom's 100th birthday party, Trent Lott was immediately branded as a racist due to his actions. I guess it was the "guilt by association" thing at work. With Obama, the rules of racial politics have changed. Of course the rules have always been created to favor Democrats, so that shouldn't come as some big surprise. Anyways, these are the people that Obama and his supporters are"proud"to display as an endoresment on their website.
posted by Alpha Conservative Male at 12:39 PM
17 Comments:
Obama said out right that he wouldn't distance himself from Wright, the "blame the white man for all" preacher. His kids are listening to this garbage. People like him are why we can't get past race. On the other hand people naturally segregate so what are the chances of a liberal, everyone hold hands, senerio? Zero.
www.goodoleboybumperstickers.com
What bigots the Black Panthers are!
Leftists are the most vile bigots and intolerant cockroaches I've ever seen!
They have no right to preach at me about being more open-minded!
brad "People like him are why we can't get past race"
it's because people like Wright are stuck in a time warp of 40 years ago and they want us all to be stuck right along with them brad. Its misery loves company. No wonder Jerimah Wright, Lewis Farahkan, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, The New Black Panthers and other hate groups have a certain number of followers. I've noticed that successful people who are achievers and are doing something with their lives don't follow these people or are apart of those groups. I wonder why.
chilerkle"What bigots the Black Panthers are!
Leftists are the most vile bigots and intolerant cockroaches I've ever seen!"
I know chilerkle, I wish I had a massive super sized can of raid to spray on them. It's totally bizzare that the so called open minded liberals are so closed minded to the fact that hate groups that are made up of blacks are still HATE groups. Something just dawned on me chilerkle. Louis Farahkan once referred to Christianity as a "gutter religion". Yet Jerimah Wright who suppositely is a "Christian" pastor, gave the very man who trashed his faith an award. It just goes to show that racism and intelligence don't mix.
Brad interjects;"On the other hand people naturally segregate so what are the chances of a liberal, everyone hold hands, senerio? Zero."
Not quite the "eternal optimist", are we, Brad?
That web-link you posted doesn't really suit my tastes. However, you do know thats the Ba'ath Party flag, and Saddam is kind of...ah...dead!
It will be interesting to watch him if he is indeed the Democratic nominee. He will be forced to answer more than his 'like eight questions'. He does not do well the little bit that he is pressed. He will have to answer some hard questions or look like he is trying to hide his true views.
"Louis Farahkan once referred to Christianity as a "gutter religion". Yet Jerimah Wright who suppositely is a "Christian" pastor, gave the very man who trashed his faith an award. It just goes to show that racism and intelligence don't mix."
Not to mentiion Mr. F. referred to Jews as bloodsuckers. I guess that includes those Jews who wrote nearly the entire Bible as inspired by God to do so.
"It will be interesting to watch him if he is indeed the Democratic nominee. He will be forced to answer more than his 'like eight questions'. He does not do well the little bit that he is pressed. He will have to answer some hard questions or look like he is trying to hide his true views."
Perhaps he can answered these disturbing allegations raised by this article:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2462
I believe Tyrone is sooooooo right. Obama and his pastor do seem like black nationalists.
I made a response on myspace blog to his pastor's absurd claims of Jesus was killed for being a black by rich white men:
The reverend Wright made the claim that Jesus was killed for being a black man by rich white people, who were Romans.
Let's look at that. Let's assume for the sake of the argument that he got the colors of Jesus and the Romans correctly (don't know if he is wrong on color of those groups or not, but it is irrelevent to what the Bible teaches, no matter how the irrelevent Wright wished it otherwise).
That would mean by that logic, Jews in Jesus' time were blacks since Jesus was a Jew.
And if that's the case, in this case of Jewish authorities who called for Jesus to be crucified by the Romans, the pastor has just proved black on black crime.
I am sure he did not intend for that.
But if he wants so much to play on the theme that the Bible was talking about Jesus' death being about over color, to make whites out to be some evil people, then he would also have to go after those of his own color.
Therein lies his selective use of argumentation which he falsely claimed to be from the Bible.
Let's examine other thing he said.
He made the claim of Romans being rich white people based on the claim that they were Italians.
Another ignorant statement by him.
Italians today come from certain Germanic tribes, that overran the Italian peninsula, such as the Vandals and the Visigoths (the latter also took over what is modern-day Spain, so there is a whole lot of truth to the statement Italians and Spanish are cousins).
Those who lived in Italy in the Roman days were Latins mixed in with Estrucans.
So Wright did not even have his facts correct about history of groups of people to even make the argument Jesus was a black man killed by "rich white people."
Nor does he care about fidelity to biblical truth, or otherwise he would have notice that Romans and Jews alike both have roles, and his logic would dictate Jews were blacks then, thus blacks would have been involved in the death of Jesus, too.
Obama will have a whole lot of explaining to do with his alliances. Comrades matter when trying to get to know someone. He thought he could hide that part of his life. Not with hundreds of cable/sattelite channels and the Internet.
Of course now Wright is going to live in a rich neighborhood with the evil rich white people. It's all about the dollar. It's obviously not about the gospel.
You are so right.
You know what else, we can get along as individuals when we don't have government and media telling us we need to look at each others' color.
Most people want someone to follow and someone to blame for their problems. Accuracy is optional.
Sad thing is that even when Obama's pastor is right, like media does tend to cover more about white victims than black victims, he blows his points by attacking character of someone like Natalie Holloway which amounted to saying she is some drunken whore:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59887
thuyen tran"Sad thing is that even when Obama's pastor is right, like media does tend to cover more about white victims than black victims, he blows his points by attacking character of someone like Natalie Holloway which amounted to saying she is some drunken whore"
Jerimah Wright suffers from the same problem Barack Obama suffers from. They both have FOOT in MOUTH disease. For those fools, there isn't a cure sad to say.
forty two"Most people want someone to follow and someone to blame for their problems. Accuracy is optional."
I've noticed that too forty two. If people would just learn to follow their own lead as individuals and take responsibility for their actions as individuals, they wouldn't have half the problems they have now.
Hi,
I am very proud of your log,
I am Cuban and have always
wondered, why liberal democrats
behave as if they have bought
and paid for the black vote,
these people turn the truth
upside down and feed it back
to people that have become, almost
like human robots and they go around repeating the liberal talking points, you have done a
good job illustrating how bad
this candidate Obama would be for this country, but if you want to take things further and awaken people in your log, research
GLOBAL POVERTY ACT by Obama
Even if this man does not become
president this bill he has introduced for vote in November
could damage our country beyond repair, i will see if i can give you a link, but not sure it will go on here.
Keep up the good work
Maggie
Obama wants to end world poverty on your nickel and surrender the United States to the United Nations
By Vincent Gioia
Overlooked in the fervor to select a Democrat nominee is what Obama really stands for; we can only hope this will not be the case in the national election if Obama is chosen. There are many ideas proposed by Obama to criticize him about but one that stands out and has great implications is the Global Poverty Act Obama supports.
The Global Poverty Act (S.2433) would require the United States to spend $845 billion ($845,000,000,000.00) on welfare to third-world countries. This amounts to a tax of over $2,000 on each man, woman and child in the United States. The foreign aid budget now stands at $300 billion; the Act would add the additional expenditure to the already huge amount allocated to assist the world.
As Phyllis Schlafly wrote recently:
"Obama's costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts..."
WorldNetDaily.com quotes Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media as saying:
"[T]he legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years... would amount to $845 billion 'over and above what the U.S. already spends. "The plan passed the House in 2007 'because most members didn't realize what was in it.' Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require." (Emphasis added to show the seriousness of the chance this horrendous bill may become law.)
The cost in money of Obama’s Global Poverty Act is not the only problem. The bill requires the President: "acting through the Secretary of State, and in consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies of the United States Government, international organizations, international financial institutions, the governments of developing and developed countries, United States and international nongovernmental organizations, civil society organizations, and other appropriate entities, shall develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further... the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal".
The "international organizations" and "international nongovernmental organizations" and "other appropriate entities" are of course the United Nations; the same institution that has a record of corruption, bad judgment and anti-Americanism.
In 2000 the United Nations established a “Millennium Development Goal” (referred to in the Global Poverty Act) having among its provisions: a "currency transfer tax," (a tax imposed on companies and individuals who must exchange dollars for foreign currency); a "tax on the rental value of land and natural resources"; "royalty on worldwide fossil energy projection -- oil, natural gas, coal"; "fees for the commercial use of the oceans and fees for airplane use of the skies", fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum", "fees on foreign exchange transactions", and a "tax on the carbon content of fuels".
The Millennium Development Goal also includes: a "standing peace force," (that is, a United Nations army); a "UN arms register of all small arms and light weapons," (which would enable guns to be regulated or confiscated in contradiction to the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution); "peace education," to be offered "at all levels from preschool through university"; and "political control of the global economy." All this would be done by the UN General Assembly because in addition to all else, the Goal includes "strengthening the United Nations for the 21st century" by "eliminating" the veto and permanent membership in the Security Council. (Note: the third world holds a majority in the UN General Assembly.)
The Millennium Development Goal also proposes: "eradication of poverty" by the "redistribution [of] wealth and land," cancellation of "the debts of developing countries, and "fair distribution of the earth's resources."
The United Nations Millennium Development Goal resembles the goals developed and implemented by the totalitarian Nazi regime in Germany under Adolph Hitler.
Many in the Senate have already announced support for Obama’s Global Poverty Act; among them; Senators Richard Lugar, Joseph Biden, Maria Cantwell, Chris Dodd, Dick Durbin, Russ Feingold, Diane Feinstein, Chuck Hagel, Olympia Snowe, Tim Johnson, Tom Harkin and Robert Mendez. (President Bill Clinton also endorsed the Global Poverty Act.)
I suggest we do as Phyllis Schafley recommends:
"The Global Poverty Act would be a giant step toward the Millennium Goals of global governance and international taxes on Americans. Tell your Senators to kill this un-American bill."
We should also remember what Barrack Obama stands for when we vote in the presidential election if he is on the Democrat ticket. Election of Obama would mean a loss of the independence our soldiers have fought and died for us to maintain.
Vincent Gioia is a retired patent attorney living in Palm Desert, California. His articles may be read at www.vincentgioia.com and he may be contacted at gioia@gte.net.
Awesome post and great blog. I am putting a link to your blog on my blog. You rock.
John
Post a Comment
<< Home