Saturday, May 16, 2009

The latest attempts by the "intolerant" left to destroy Carrie Prejean has backfired yet again.

Some "controversial" pictures surfaced a few weeks ago of Carrie Prejean posing "semi topless". I guess this was suppose to have been an attempt at a "October surprise" but in May against Prejean. I know for certain that if Carrie would have been the good little politically correct puppet and won the Miss America pageant, those pictures wouldn't have seen the light of day. I know how the game is played with the left. When they can't control or defeat the message of the opposition, they then try to the discredit the messenger of the opposition instead. Joseph Wurzelbacher aka Joe the Plumber knows all about how liberals use character assassination, when they can't defend or attack an idea in the arena of ideas. The photos in question are so tame in nature; Hugh Hefner of Playboy would probably yawn in boredom just looking at them. The releasing of the these pictures were suppose to have served a two front attack strategy against Miss California. The first strategy was to have her dethroned as Miss California. Donald Trump is the owner of the Miss America pagent, and he said that the pictures were "beautiful". He also said he saw nothing distasteful about the photos, so Carrie Prejean can keep her title as Miss California. At the news conference held by Donald Trump, Trump and Prejean made reference to Hillary and Baracks holding the same shared views on the what defines marriage. Carrie gave an impassioned and articulate speech about how she was trashed simply for exercising her first amendment right.



So the first plan backfired for the left. The latest tactic that is circulating around is to try and destroy Carrie's reputation as a Christian, because she took the photos in the first place. When liberals try to use god in order to make a point, its better then watching Comedy Central. Their "argument" is that Prejean is a "hypocrite", because she claims to be a Christian yet took the semi topless pictures. Actually magazines like GQ, Rolling Stones and Esquire and Vanity Fair show more skin on their front covers then Prejean showed in the "controversial" pictures, and these are nationally circulated non adult themed magazines. If liberals actually took the time to read the bible, they would quit their latest smear attack.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have seen one photo which she claimed that the wind blew her top to expose her left breast. Now, if the wind blew her top, why not her hair?

Now, if it was me, I would have the conscience to not have that photo printed and just try the shoot again. However, I just don't find her excuse believable.

But, I do respect what she said about everybody has a right to free speech and an opionion. But it is not right to condemn her of her beliefs.

6:58 PM  
Anonymous Chilerkle said...

The Left is definitely going to war against people who disagree with them I respect Carrie and I am disgusted with that airhead Mylie Cyrus for attacking Carrie.

I hope that dunce Mylie Cyrus realizes that gays will throw her under the bus eventually!

Gays are more important to the left than women and minorities LOL!

Notice that when black women get murdered or raped their tragedies are not given nearly as much coverage as some slight against gays both real and imagined.

10:44 PM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

The photos really don't bother me. Nationally circulated non porn magazines show more on their covers. If she posed in playboy or some hard core adult magazine, then I would be a completely different story. Her views on marriage will never become invalid no matter what she does. The kooks on the left seem to think other wise. Her free speech right are what is in question. Obama's top

8:28 AM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

Chilerkle "The Left is definitely going to war against people who disagree with them I respect Carrie and I am disgusted with that airhead Mylie Cyrus for attacking Carrie."

The left just shows how hypocritical they are in their claim of being "tolerant" with every word that comes out of their mouths Chilerkle. If this was a court case against liberal bigotry, hate speech, intolerance, and non compassion, the evidence against liberals would be crushing.Here's the kooky aspect Chilerkle. Liberals attack Prejean for her beliefs on marriage, yet most of Americans share her belief in traditional marriage. If liberals are so brave and bad, why don't they just come out and attack the majority of Americans then. They'll never do it, because they are too cowardly. I believe they pick on people they know will "take the high ground" and not attack back. I've noticed when liberals then to initially come after me, they tend to stop very quickly when I open my mouth in response. As for Mylie Cyrus, Hannah Montana is just a fad like most things kid related. Besides, Cyrus is trying to stay in the good graces of Disney and the leftist crowd. She's just another shallow young liberal more concerned about image then substance. I guess she doesn't know the demographics of her own show Chilerkle.Her show is overwhelmingly watched by heterosexual children and families. Her boss is Disney, and Disney is pretty liberal on the issue of gays. That could also possibly explain her actions but I won't say for sure.

chilerkle "Gays are more important to the left than women and minorities LOL!"

That my just be the case Chilerkle. Gays have been coming out lately and attacking blacks for not supporting the gay agenda of "gay marriage". The leftists don't want to come down on one side or the other, because they don't want t alienate their support. Most Blacks and Hispanics don't support homosexuality. I would be so funny to watch a Barney Franks or other liberals go into black churches and tell the congregations they need to support gay marriage. Liberals know better.

Chilerkle "Notice that when black women get murdered or raped their tragedies are not given nearly as much coverage as some slight against gays both real and imagined."

If the black victims were killed or rapped by other blacks or Hispanics, then it only gets a five second reference on the nightly news. If the attackers happen to be "white", then it is an entirely different ballgame. Gays do get more press, when they are attacked then blacks, yet more blacks exist then gays by 5 to 1 in regards to population.

8:56 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home