The religion of peace has gone wild again in violence.

If I hear appeasers of Islam repeat yet again that Islam is the religion of peace, I am going to throw up on them. Why is it that Christians, Jews and Hindus don't act like mindless savages, when someone destroys or damages copies to their holy book? When a person sets a bible on fire, Christians don't go out and kill other people to protest it, they actually pray for that person's soul instead, imagine that. Nothing is more irritating then listening to people act like spineless cowards towards a bunch of people who still live and think as if they were living in the 5th century. A few days ago, a bunch of Korans were burned at a U.S Military base in Afghanistan. Some officials are saying that American held Afghan prisoners were using the pages of the Koran to pass messages back and forth. Under the laws of Islam, when a Koran is desecrated, it is suppose to be destroyed. The the military officials were actually respecting the laws of Islam by doing so. As you can expect, that still isn't setting well with the 5th century Middle Eastern throwbacks.



Of course, Obama has bent over and apologized non stop since the story was reported and the protests began. Eight foreigners were killed, also two American soldiers were killed by an Afghan solider in retaliation over Koran burnings.



Where is Obama in demanding an apology and expressing condemnation over our soldiers being killed over something stupid that they weren't even apart of? Why are progressives so willing to walk on egg shells in hopes of appeasing nut case Muslim fanatics, yet these same people have no problem attacking Christians and attacking their faith? I guess that's because Christians are so tolerant and non vocal, and they don't kill people like Muslim fanatics do. Funny how progressives have the naive gull to call Christians "religious fanatics" and extremists. I know how the game works. The Muslim extremists will get a pass by the ones who will point their finger at me and millions of other people like me who are exposing the truth to what is going on. If there is a such thing as a moderate Muslim, why aren't they standing up and denouncing the elements who have hijacked their religion? Have you ever heard Christians around the world ever chant "Death to America"?

Andrew Breitbart interviewed an Obama supporter who finally gave a valid reason why he is voting for Obama again in November.

Maybe I was wrong about the mindset of everyday Obama supporters. Maybe some of them are highly intelligent, well informed voters like those on the right tend to be.



Nah, Maybe it's just like this guy, they are all high out of their minds. Pass the bong man!!

Occupy called CPAC Racist. What else is new?

The words "racist, racists and racism" are crutches to the left, they can't go anywhere without using them against the right. At this point, calling people on the right racists have become an embedded response by progressives. Progressives really don't have a clue at how stupid they sound, when they constantly use the word racist. Because of the over use of the word by the left, the word racist has been diluted. Once upon a time when a person was referred to as a racist by someone else, there was clear cut evidence to warrant that person using that word to describe the other person

A racist to a progressive is nothing more then a person who is white who doesn't agree with them.

I was suppose to be attending CPAC this year, but some business came up at the last minute, and I couldn't attend. I will be there next year though. Anyways, the Occupy freaks, kooks and weirdos tried to crash CPAC last week. They were outside chanting that "CPAC IS RACIST". I'm sure if everybody who made up the Occupy filth movement were asked if they have ever been inside CPAC, they would all say "no, but I know what it is like inside". To bad that the people who slept in their own filth for months didn't even bother to ask blacks who have attended CPAC whether "it was racist".



Clearly, the left is never going to abandon the race card, because that is all they have. It's not like these people can debate the issues and defend their ideology. That would be too much like having to do the right thing in the arena of ideas. A few years ago, I debated a white progressive and he said I supported racists, because I am a conservative who is black. Of course, his claim was beyond stupid. I decided to have some fun with the idiot just to show how ignorant he was. I claimed that I had a white friend named "Joe Fictitious". Yeah, notice the last name. I thought the name up on the fly standing right in front of him, lol. Anyways, I told the dolt that Joe was a conservative, who believed in securing the borders, protecting tradition marriage, he was pro life and supported traditional American values in general. I asked the lemming, was my "friend" Joe Fictitious a racist due to his views. True to form, the moron of course said yes he was a racist and I was a traitor for being friends with a white racist like that. You can only imagine my absolute glee I had, when I looked the fool in his eyes and I called him brainless dumb ass and explained to him that Joe Fictitious was a person I made up just to see if he would call a person a racist he never met just because that person hold views the leftists didn't tolerate.

Thank You Sammuel L Jackson for being honest about why you voted for Obama.

Back during the 2008 election season, both white and black progressives made claims that if a person who is white didn't vote for Obama, he or she did so, because it had to do with Obama being black. When the roles were reversed and some whites stressed to Obama supporters that the only reason they voted for Obama is because he is black, they denied it. Most of them still deny it to this day. It's pitiful actually watching them continuously trying to deny the all but obvious. What progressives never figured out when they tried to blanket smear all whites who didn't vote for Obama as racists is that Obama supporters never really gave an explanation on why they voted for Obama. The reason why they couldn't explain their support for Obama is simple. Their answer would have shown them to be the hypocrites that they are. They voted for Obama based on the color of his skin. In 2008, the black rapper Ludacris made a song attacking Hillary Clinton and John McCain. The song wasn't just an attack song. It was a song to unify blacks into supporting Obama.

"we bout to make history the first black president is destined and it's meant to be
the threats ain't fazing us, the nooses or the jokes
so get off your ass, black people, it's time to get out and vote!"

Obama was forced to condemn the song, but the media never made an issue about it. I'm just not a fan of fake people. I never have been and I never will be. A certain percentage of whites did vote for McCain, because he is white. That's just a fact, however it's beyond phony for progressives to call those people racists, when they did the exact same thing, when they voted for Obama based on the color of his skin. How does two wrongs make a right? The actor Samuel L Jackson had plenty to say in an interview with Ebony Magazine two days ago. Other then Jackson swearing and using the word nigger in ever sentence almost, I thought his thoughts were well laid out and coherent, yeah right.

Samuel L Jackson. “I voted for Barack because he was black. ’Cuz that’s why other folks vote for other people — because they look like them,”. "That’s American politics, pure and simple. [Obama’s] message didn’t mean [bleep] to me. In the end, he’s a politician. I just hoped he would do some of what he said he was gonna do. I know politicians say [bleep]; they lie. ’Cuz they want to get elected.” “When it comes down to it, they wouldn’t have elected a [bleep]. Because, what’s a [bleep]? A [bleep] is scary. Obama ain’t scary at all. [Bleeps] don’t have beers at the White House. [Bleeps] don’t let some white dude, while you in the middle of a speech, call [him] a liar. A [bleep] would have stopped the meeting right there and said, ‘Who the [bleep] said that?’ I hope Obama gets scary in the next four years, ’cuz he ain’t gotta worry about getting re-elected.

How else can it be explained that Obama's run for president was called "historic". The battle cry by Obama's supporters was "let's make history". What kind of "history" were they talking about? The election of a new president is always historic, it's nothing really new. The historic aspect they were referring to was the color of Obama's skin. The supporters of Obama still get upset when he is referred to as the "affirmative action" president, but they fail to realize that they made him that by making his race the focal point of his candidacy right on through to his actual presidency. Whenever Obama is criticized based on policy, his supporters are extremely quick to label the person issuing the criticism a racist. At least black Obama supporters like Samuel L Jackson and others are honest with why they voted for Obama, I just wish more blacks could be as honest as well.

Americans don't actually follow Christian Faith?

Awhile back, Ann Coulter wrote a book called "Godless:The Church of Liberalism". It was actually a good read. Then again, that was during a time when Ann was still in her right mind. These days, it's hard to tell what's she's thinking. Anyways, her book had to do with why progressives have great disdain for traditional Christianity. If a person is a pro life devout Christian who believes in traditional marriage, that person will be unwelcome among progressives. The left has infiltrated the Church and Synagogues in America just like they have done with the schools, universities, the courts, congress, state houses etc etc. It's no secret that the left mocks Christianity whenever possible. Of course, they are way too cowardly to ever do that to the Muslim faith of Islam. Today, Democratic progressive Jan Schalowsky was on the Ed Schultz radio show. This is what she said about the Catholic Church and Evangelicals in regards to the contraception controversy in Obamacare.

Progressives claim to support abortion so much, yet they can never bring themselves to utter the word "abortion". I truly wonder why that is so. I remember when Pope John Paul died. Progressives were hoping that the next Pope to succeed him would be progressive. When they found out that Pope Benedict was selected and was going to be traditional in following the Catholic doctrine, progressives verbally attacked him. Maybe progressives would like Pope Benedict more if he was more in the mold of lets say Chicago Catholic pastor Dr. Rev. Michael Pfleger?



Progressives hate the Christian right and Evangelicals. They have long been a target by the left for a reason. What they stand for goes against the lifestyle progressives want to live. That is why people like Congresswoman Schakowsky and other progressives are targeting real Catholics and Christians.

Why is having an identification card in order to vote so threatening to progressives?

I know the answer to that question as do most you. Mention the words "VOTER IDENTIFICATION CARD" and then quickly put on a pair of headphones, because you will immediately hear a loud streaking noise by progressives howling to the moon about how "racist" such a proposal is. Don't progressive politicians want integrity restored to the voting process like everybody else who cares about their vote standing for something? I can believe I actually said that without bursting out laughing. I don't understand exactly how a law requiring "all people" to have a photo ID is even remotely "racist". Since I can't use warped logic on the issue, here's Sheila Jackson Lee to explain it.



I'm sure most of you look at Sheila Jackson Lee as a woman who's brain is on fire with no water in sight to put it out. I have that impression of her as well. So I guess according to Sheila's warped logic

Blacks don't have any money, because they aren't able to cash checks at a bank or check cashing place, because those places require Photo ID Cards

Blacks don't drive cars, because blacks need a photo drivers license which acts as a Photo ID card.

Blacks don't fly airplanes or go on cruise ships, because Photo ID cards are required.

Blacks must all be homeless, because they can't rent an apartment or buy a house, because Photo ID cards are required.

Blacks don't go shopping with credit cards, because a Photo ID might be requested upon request.

Blacks can't go into nightclubs, because the doorman might ask them to display a Photo ID card.

I'm also sure that all blacks of working age don't have jobs, because an interviewer will request a drivers license or a Photo ID and a social security card as part of a background check.

Of course I am demonstrating just how absurd Ms Lee and other progressives are in making such a lame and baseless statement. I'm black, and I have a drivers license. Before I was able to drive, I had a "five dollar" Maryland State Photo Identification card. So according to the left, blacks are so poor that they can't even afford a Photo I.D card which ranges between five to eight bucks in most states? Is that what we are really suppose to believe? This is what it is truly all about as most of you probably already know.

This has all to do about making sure illegal aliens can vote for Democratic politicians and voter fraud can occur then it does protecting blacks from voter disenfranchisement.

Putting it another way, Ms Lee and other progressives are merely using blacks as pawns in an effort to make it easy for people who aren't even citizens in this country to vote.

"Newt Groupie" says the GOP establishment is responsible for the attacks on Newt Gingrich.

It's no secret that Mitt Romney is the chosen one of the Republican establishment in the eyes of conservatives. Some are clinging to the worn out line that Mittens is the only candidate who can beat Obama. I still find that claim ridiculously flawed and laughable at face value. But be that as it may, that hasn't stopped talking heads like Ann Coulter and other media conservatives from echoing the same Jibba Jabba. The fact of the matter is that anybody who holds opposite views of Obama can easily beat him. A few ago right before the Florida primary, self described "Newt Groupie" Flora Reece talked about her perception of Newt and who she believes is out to get him. I found Flora's thoughts on Newt and what's going on to be very thought provoking. She talked about fighting for Newt all the way up to the convention in Tampa, but if Newt doesn't raise enough money going forward, he might not even make it there.

Why do black progressives become unhinged while being in the presence of black conservatives?

I have no problem defending what I believe in. I can debate my positions in a rational way without demeaning others in doing so, but I can "get down in the gutter", when progressives want to take a debate or disagreement in that direction. It's no big secret that progressives of any race can act very vicious to the point of sheer instability when confronting a person of the same race who happens to be conservative. I've experienced it with blacks many times over the years. These people "aren't" as "open minded and tolerant" as they claim to be. A person sent me a story yesterday about a black female conservative in Memphis Tennessee named Charlotte Bergman who is running for congress who unfortunately decided to be a guest on 1180 WPLX radio with the host a black progressive by the name of Thaddeus Matthews. The old saying goes in life, "treat people the way you would like to be treated. That sounds about right I think, however I don't think Thaddeus Matthews understood that concept in his verbal beat down of a person who was suppose to be his "guest" on his show. As I watched this brutal interrogation aka "interview" I really felt bad for Ms. Bergman. Regardless of her political affiliation, she did not deserve to be treated like the way she was treated. As disgusting as Matthews acted during the interview, even I was shocked at how much lower he sunk when Ms. Bergman finally decided she's had enough of being verbally assaulted.

Part 1


Part 2



With progressives, their thought process if you want to call it that is based primarily on emotions. If I was the guest on Mr. Matthews's show, there would be no way in hell he would be able to do to me what he did to Ms. Bergman. It would be zero chance! I have no doubt Matthews would ever call Ms. Bergman to apologize for his behavior. He'll never do it, because in his mind he believes he was right in what he did. To him, the ends justified the means. So much for progressive civil discourse.