Monday, September 29, 2008

Exhibit A: Evidence that Democrats tried to belittle the fraud at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Democrats trying to cover themselves in this financial meltdown are blaming "corporate greed" and "failed Bush economic" polices. Whenever a question is posed to Democrats asking specifically what policys of Republicans lead to the financial mess, they can't name one. It's amazing that Democrats today are saying that the economy is nearing that of "Great Depression", yet just a few years ago DEMOCRATS WERE DEFENDING FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC. I said before and I will say it again. Democrats caused this crisis and they own it. I don't want to hear any crap about "There is plenty of blame to go around". That is nothing more then an excuse by Democrats to "pass the buck" and draw attention away from them. This video is from an investigation hearing on the financial practices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Take some notes on the people and political party drawing criticism of Fannie and Freddie, also take note of the people and political party trying to defending Freddie and Fannie. Once again here's exhibit A into who is responsible for the housing and financial mess we find ourselves in right now. Just a side note that needs to be asked. Why did Democrats attack the regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Just more food for thought.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

John McCain puts "country first" and suspends his campaign.

Actions speak louder then words, and John McCain showed today that he truly is a man of his word. John McCain suspended his campaign to in order to be in Washington to help draft a bill to deal with the loomingfinancial crisis. People like Harry Reid called it a "photo op". Harry Reid is to stupid to understand that John McCain understands his elected position, that of a U.S Senator. Truth be told if Democrats would have listened to John McCain three years ago about the fraud and mounting debt of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, our country would not be in the shape it is now in regards to the financial and housing markets. It's kind of ironic that McCain has to suspend his campaign to help deal with a massive situation that he warned would happen three years ago. The Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 20005 aka Senate bill 190 was introduced by Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and was co sponsored by Republican Senators Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina, John Sununu of New Hampshire and John McCain of Arizona.
This is the text from Senator McCain he delivered on the Senate floor in regards o the FHERRA. These are two paragraphs that I took from McCain's speech that I want everybody to read very very carefully, and just remember that McCain said all of this three years ago.

John McCain 2006"Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae's regulator reported that the company's quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were "illusions deliberately and systematically created" by the company's senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal"

John McCain 2006 "The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae's former chief executive officer, OFHEO's report shows that over half of Mr. Raines' compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac".

I have more to say about how this whole financial mess started and about Franklin Raines later trust me ont that. This is the point I want to make. The Obama cult and their friends in the media want to portray the image that John McCain doesn't know anything about the economy. Obvious McCain understands alot more about the economy then they want to give him credit for. Barack Obama was elected to the U.S Senate in 2004 and was sworn in January of 2005. If Obama is such an expert on the economy, why didn't he help McCain in a "bipartisan" effort to reform and bring oversight to Fannie and Freddie knowing the massive damage those two organizations would cause to the Housing Market and the economy if they were to fail?Just a question I'm throwing out. Obama today stated that he plans to go on with the debate. I never thought Obama could look any more shallow and selfish then before today. It should come as no surprise that the position of a United State Senator is beneath Obama. When he was elected to the U.S Senate he spent a grand total of 143 days or four months and two weeks in the offical role of a U.S Senator before he came to the conclusion that he wanted to run for President. Anybody can give a speech at a German beer festival on a teleprompter but not everybody can be a leader. John McCain hasn't forgotten why he was sent to Washington. He's putting his personal ambitions aside and putting "country first". Obama on the other hand is all about Obama. Obama said today that a leader should be able to "multitask". I may be wrong, but I believe that the financial storm that is facing our country deserves our elected Representatives FULL UNDIVIDED ATTENTION!!! What else do anyone except from a guy so full of himself and so about himself that he created his own Presidential seal for crying out loud. Tell me if this doesn't sound accurate. John McCain 2006 "If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole." A leader understands the situtation at hand. Need I say more?

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Finally Hollywood does a movie "right"

I've never been a big fan of Hollywood, and I never will. Hollywood is a cesspool of liberals. Every year at the Oscars, liberals get on their self anointed soap box and actually actually think Americans care what they think about politics. Some times they sound pretty stupid and more often then not they just come off as extremely annoying. There is a new movie coming out on October the 3rd that is going to be a breath of fresh air from Hollywood. The movie is called "An American Carol". It's directed by David Zucker, and stars some of the few conservatives that are actually in Hollywood such as Kevin Farley, Kelsey Grammer, John Voight and Dennis Hopper. David Zucker was once a liberal Democrat, but he has recently "SEEN THE LIGHT". All I can say is congratulations to David. He's going to now find out real quick who's his friends truly are in Hollywood. Anyways this is the trailer and please support a movie actually worth supporting for once.

Monday, September 15, 2008

The "presidental" community organizer, slumlords, plight, dispare,and NO CHANGE

With 95% of the media kissing up and protecting Barack Obama and relentlessly going after Sarah Palin, it is refreshing to see that there is still some media outlets that remember what journalism actually is. This story was written June 27Th of this year by the Boston Globe and of course the rest of the media decided to turn a blind eye and not pick up on it. The connection between Tony Rezko and then former Illionis State Senator Barack Obama went totally unreported by the media for obviously reasons. Hillary briefly touched on it during the primaries and she was punished for it. Obama took offense to when Governor Palin belittled Obama's role as a"community organizer" at the Republican National Convention. Obama should be offended not at Palin but at himself. The low income housing development Grove Parc is in Barack Obama's old State Senate district. This exert if from the Boston Globe I thought should be highlighted to drive a point I want to make.

" Grove Parc and several other prominent failures were developed and managed by Obama's close friends and political supporters. Those people profited from the subsidies even as many of Obama's constituents suffered. Tenants lost their homes; surrounding neighborhoods were blighted".

So, as many of these homes went without repairs and became blighted and unsafe eye soars to the communities in Chicago, what was the "community organizer" doing to help the suffering of his constituents? Before Obama talks about the Governor of Alaska having experience or lack there of to be Vice President, maybe just maybe Barack Obama should question his own experience not only as a "community organizer" but as a "state senator". Obama failed the people that entrusted their votes to him in Chicago, so why should anyone entrust their vote to him on the national level as President? Normally a person has to do a good job in their current role to be promoted to the next level. How ironic is this? The people that Obama was suppose to be looking out for are living in deplorable conditions, yet Barack Obama is living high on the hog in his and his wife's million dollar mansion thanks to convicted slum lord Tony Rezko. The media doesn't want to touch none of that. I guess Sarah Palin's daughter is more important. They are more concerned about how "historic" his campaign is and how Sarah Palin is helping John McCain to ruin it. Let this go to show that just because the mainstream media decides to sit on a story to protect someone they like doesn't mean that the news doesn't get out in one form or the other view the "New Media".

One of the rare occasions when Saturday NIght Live is actually funny

The New Yorker should take notes on how to do satire. SNL actually did a funny skit for once.

Friday, September 12, 2008

Us Magazine is just another example why the old media is dying.

The backlash against the mainstream media is well underway over the "historic" negative bias against a candidate that hasn't done anyting to warrant it. The only people that are too blind to see it is of course the media itself. Two weeks ago when Us Magazine tried to do a "dirty bomb" story and cover on Sarah Palin, they actually thought they were going to inflict damage on Sarah Palin and in the process get away with it. Well it looks like the "geniuses" at Us Magazine struck out twice. Not only did their hit piece DIDN'T hurt the favorable perception of Sarah Palin in the eyes of mainstream Americans, it actually increased it. On top of that, outraged subscribers have cancelled their subscriptions to the rag. Some industry insider figures have the cancellations as high as 10,000. Us Magazine is just another example in a long list of examples why people don't trust the mainstream media anymore. It really astonishes me why liberals still can't figure out why so many people watch and trust Fox News over CNN and MSNBC COMBINED! It's really a simple concept. People actually just want the news and not activist journalism bias passed off as the news. MSNBC once had the two obnoxious loudmouths Keith Olberman and Chris Mathews working as "anchors. I'm not saying it was a dumb move by MSNBC execs, well actually I am saying it was a dumb move and then some. Think of it this way. What if Fox News hired Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter to be their news anchors? The credibility of Fox would go down the tubes in a heartbeat. That is exactly what happened to MSNBC. In business the saying is "give the people what they want, and they will lead a path to your door". Ten years ago Fox News was created, and they have been number ever since. The people got what they wanted, fair and balanced news.

This is why airheads need to stick to doing what they do best.

Pamela Anderson has never been accused of being an intellectual dynamo for obvious reasons. I don't have a problem with celebrities wanting to bash Sarah Palin. I actually like it in an odd way. When they open their mouthes, it becomes so apparent how utterly stupid and moronic they sound. All I can say is thank goodness the clueless nose candy crowd are lliberals, if one day they woke up and got a clue, conservatives actually might have something to worry about. Anyways back to Pamela Anderson. Yesterday Ms. Anderson said the following about Sarah Palin ""I can't stand her," Anderson replied after rolling her eyes. "She can suck it!" If there is one person in this country that is an expert at sucking things is Pamela. Just ask Brett Michaels and Tommy Lee. It shoudn't come as a surprise that Pamela Anderson can't relate to Sarah Palin. Sarah has morals and is happly married. and Pamela Anderson when it comes to sleeping with rockstars has been around the block more times then the icecream man and the mailman combined. Sarah Palin represents dignity and class. Then there is trash in the form of Pamela Anderson.

Monday, September 08, 2008

Obama attracts the kookiest people in America and now Great Britain too.

It's bad enough that Hollywood and music celebrities have taken time to pull their noses away from their cocaine trays to go after John McCain and Sarah Palin, but this has gone to far. Now B grade celebrities from other countries have joined in on the attacks. I never heard of Russell Brand until yesterday, gee I wonder why? Apparently this "bloke is a comedian from Great Britain, and he was asked for some insane reason to host the MTV Video Music Awards. I'm disappointed in MTV seriously. They could have at least asked K Fed or someone else more well known then Brand. Anyways, duirng the show yesterday this British guy pleaded for Americans to vote for Barack Obama. Since Great Britain is falling apart around it's citizens, their government has thousands of cameras monitoring them like prisoners and Muslims are taking over their country like rats, I guess Brand wants Americans to elect a naive fool so that our country can emulate failure like Great Britain? Thanks but no thanks. Amazing that a cross between a strung out Johnny Deep and Carrot Top would think he can make jokes about Sarah Palin, her daughter and her boy friend. What I found hilarious was when he called Bush a "retard". This coming from a guy that looks like he escaped from a psych ward and sleeps in the gutter? I know it isn't going so hot in the latest polls for Obama, but has it gotten so bad that he now needs B grade celebs from other countries to beg on his behalf for votes? My how the might have fallen in such a short period of time. For what it's worth, this is what the euro trash crackhead thinks about our politics at the MTV Video Music Awards.

Sunday, September 07, 2008

Us Magazine reports aka attacks, you decide.

The definition of "deception" is "causing one to believe what is not true or fail to believe what is true". Take a look at these two US Magazine covers for a moment. It's no secret that the media in America hates Sarah Palin's gutts. Their bias against her and for Obama has become so extreme, they can no longer portray the illusion of being "objective". Barack and Michelle Obama were featured in Us Magazine in June of this year entitled "WHY BARACK LOVES HER", and Sarah Palin is in the current edition entitled "BABIES,LIES, AND SCANDALS"! Liberals really do believe that they are the only smart people in the room,and everybody else are a bunch dopes that can't figure out when they are being manipulated and lied too. This is a video of Megan Kelly from Fox News thankfully drilling and exposing Us Magazine senior editor Bradley Jacobs for his lies. The second video is of Megan Kelly explaining the bias of the cover. At least there is one network that still understands what "Integrity in Journaism" is all about.

The title "SEX,LIES AND SCANDALS" in itself is misleading and Megan exposes that. There hasn't been no lies by Palin, there is no scandal in regards to Palin, and the only issue of sex has to do with HER DAUGHTER and not Sarah Palin, Notice also that the cover doesn't have Palin's husband Todd on it. Compare that too the MIchelle and Barack cover. Clearly the magazine wanted to paint a picture Barack's happy marriage to Michelle. I don't believe that Us Magazine created the edition featuring Sarah Palin just a few days after she was announced by John McCain, because they were fascinated by her and wanted to do a detailed story on her. It was clearly orchestrated. The owner of Us magazine Jann Wenner is also the owner of Rolling Stone Magazine, and it turns out that she is a BIG donor to Barack Obama. Did Jann have any input on the current edition or demand the hit piece be done? The contrast between the two editions is no cawansidance. For all the piling on by Obama's saragots and allies in the media. little do they know they are actually not fooling anyone. In a Rasmussen poll released last Thursday 51% of Americans believe the media is purposely trying to hurt Sarah Palin.
The media is made up of liberals, and liberals are always out of touch with mainstream America. There is a reason why the network news shows are losing viewers left and right. Newspapers are constantly cutting staff due to ever decreasing readers. People know there's a liberal bias in reporting. There are people that wouldn't have voted for the McCain Palin ticket the day McCain announced her, will vote for the ticket just out of spite over the media's coverage of Palin. The media should quit while it's behind, because it's not having any impact against Palin and McCain in the polls. The old saying is "you can have to much of a good thing". In the media's case "Reporting too much of negative things isn't leading to good things for them".

Thursday, September 04, 2008

A hockey mom pitbull sinks her teeth into Obama and BIden.

One week ago today John McCain shocked the political world by selecting Sarah Palin as his choice for his Vice Presidential running mate. When I heard the announcement, I knew right off the bat that McCain's selection was going to be trouble for Barack Obama, his borg collective and his worshipers in the media along with the liberal elites. To say that they didn't and still don't like her doesn't even begin to tell the story. This self professed "hockey mom" had to endure six days of constant degrading, vile smears, rumors, and ignorant, loathing, bitter, attacks just because she is a conservative female. I've never seen the media attack a candidate right from go non stop like they have done with Palin. When you watch this video, you will understand why the media hates and fear this hockey mom from Alaska so much. Sarah Palin helped to accomplish what John McCain couldn't do on his own. She delivered the conservative base to John McCain without really saying a word for most of the week. The media and the borg of Obama drastically miscalculated in their strategy to try and take out Palin as fast as possible. They thought McCain was going to throw Palin under the bus like Obama does with frequency to people he feel are a liability or have long out lived their usefulness. That didn't happen with McCain. They underestimated John McCain's sense of loyalty. The media also underestimated the ground swell support for Palin because of the media's own attacks on her family. What the media did in the end was create a curiosity factor among people about Palin. That definitely wasn't their intent. Sarah Palin is now seen as the new rising star and darling of the right. She has become so popular that women want to buy the exact frame of glasses that she wears. Palin clearly does present a problems for the left. How do they attack a pit bull hockey mom without getting mercilessly torn apart by the hockey mom's extended family of conservative pit bulls on the right? The answer is, THEY CANT!! RUFF RUFF!! This is the pit bull hockey mom showing exactly why she was chosen to be the second "top dog".

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Is a sexist double standard rearing it's ugly head?

Every since it came to light that Sarah Palin's 17 year old daughter Bristol was pregnant, Obama supporters and their allies in the media have done everything humanly possible to try and make a private family situation the next Watergate scandal. Maybe I'm missing something or I'm out of touch, but I can't see or find the connection between what Bristol Palin does with her boyfriend and Sarah Palin running for Vice President. So I dwelled on this question for almost a full day. Then it dawned on me. This is being blown up to be a big deal, because Sarah Pilan is a "WOMAN". When McCain introduced Pilan on Friday, the very first wave of attacks against Pilan were centered on her being a mother of five and that she should be home raising her family. Those remarks in itself were extremely sexist and and chauvinist. Then on Saturday the attacks focused on Sarah Palin not deciding to abort her son Trig that was going to be born with Down Syndrome. It's comical that liberals shout until their lungs hurt about "the right to choose". Well Sarah made a choice, and her choice was a personal choice and and family choice. She choose to have the child, yet the "compassionate" ideologues on the left verbally demeaned her for doing so. Now the third wave of attacks are focused on her daughter Bristol being pregnant at 17. When all of these "criticisms" are tied together and taken at face value, they have nothing to do with Sarah Palin as a person or her ability to serve in the role of Vice President. What if Sarah Palin wasn't a female conservative Republican that was pro life, but a "male" liberal Democrat that was "pro abortion"? If she was a man, would the media and liberals be attacking him over "HIS" 17 year old daughter" being pregnant out of wedlock? The answer is no. How many children are born out of wedlock to liberals in Hollywood each year? Many of them were in Denver just last week for the Democrat National Convention. Living in Baltimore, all I hear on a daily basis is young men and women talking about "their baby's daddy" or "their baby's mother". When you turn on the Maury Povich show, every other show is a "paternity test" show to find out who's the daddy or mother. Clearly values have changed in regards to sex and out of wedlock pregnancies and births. The same hypocrites that would say "it's no big deal" if their daughter was pregnant at 17 are the very ones attacking Sarah Palin for the choice her daughter made to keep her child. I forgot to mention one thing. The young man that got Bristol pregnant is also going to marry her. People are slow to mention that fact for unknown reasons. Just when you thought the chauvinists politics and attacks ended with Hillary Clinton, the new chapter sadly has begun with Sarah Palin. If liberals and the media think by attacking Sarah and her daughter this is somehow going to damage Sarah among the conservative base, they might want to think again.

Monday, September 01, 2008

McCain takes aim at Obama and BIden with the choice of Sarah Palin as his VIce Presidental running mate.


I have a lot to say about McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his Vice President running mate. When John McCain sealed the required amount of delegates a few months ago to assure him the Republican nomination for President, liberals loved it. They knew that the Conservative base of the Republican Party wouldn't rally around McCain due to him being a "maverick". Liberals thought it would be smooth sailing to the white house with Barack Obama leading the way. Now it looks like Obama supporters actually do have something to worry about after all. Their worst fear has become a reality. With the selection of Governor Sarah Palin from Alaska on Friday, John McCain has done what many political pundits thought was impossible. He has rallied and energized the conservative base around him with his choice. In other words, it's now an all new ball game.

The momentum is clearly with McCain at the moment. When I researched her bio, I was extremely impressed. The only form of attack liberals can bring against Palin is the illusion that she has a lack of experience. For them to use those words "lack of experience" in regards to someone else other then Barack Obama is a JOKE! I can't even come up with a word stronger then hypocritical. Do Obama supporters really expect to be taken serious levying that claim against Palin? Less then twelve hours after McCain introduced Palin as his running mate, Obama supporters went into personal attack mode against Sarah Palin. I know kooks exist on both sides of the political and ideological divide, but the vile hatred toward Palin by liberals is way over the top to the point of vileness. Losers on blogs like the Daily Kaos have attacked Palin for not aborting her child that has Down Syndrome. This is why I know Obama supporters know they are in trouble. When Obama selected Joe Biden. Conservatives didn't stoop to the gutter and attacked BIden on a personal level. They attacked Obama over his hypocrisy for claiming to be about changing Washington yet choosing a 35 year Washington insider. It's clear that Palin does put the female vote in play. Liberals claim McCain is "pandering" to women. I wonder how much liberals were making that same claim against Al Gore in 2000 when he picked the Joe Lieberman has his running making him the first Jewish Vice Presidential candidate. Anyone that follows politics know that pandering is basic politics 101. Are liberals going to tell me that Obama isn't pandering to environmental groups, unions groups, gay groups, minority groups, trial lawyer groups, abortion groups etc? Also do liberals think by attacking the size of Alaska they are going to gain support among rural voters in battleground states? In actuality Biden's state of Delaware is SMALLER then Alaska. I will be talking more about Palin in detail in the near future. McCain is definitely on a roll. Ever since the campaign shakeup little over a month ago, his campaign has been firing on all cylinders. Coming off his impressive performance at Saddle Back, McCain has definitely hit his stride with the selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate.