Us Magazine reports aka attacks, you decide.
The definition of "deception" is "causing one to believe what is not true or fail to believe what is true". Take a look at these two US Magazine covers for a moment. It's no secret that the media in America hates Sarah Palin's gutts. Their bias against her and for Obama has become so extreme, they can no longer portray the illusion of being "objective". Barack and Michelle Obama were featured in Us Magazine in June of this year entitled "WHY BARACK LOVES HER", and Sarah Palin is in the current edition entitled "BABIES,LIES, AND SCANDALS"! Liberals really do believe that they are the only smart people in the room,and everybody else are a bunch dopes that can't figure out when they are being manipulated and lied too. This is a video of Megan Kelly from Fox News thankfully drilling and exposing Us Magazine senior editor Bradley Jacobs for his lies. The second video is of Megan Kelly explaining the bias of the cover. At least there is one network that still understands what "Integrity in Journaism" is all about.
The title "SEX,LIES AND SCANDALS" in itself is misleading and Megan exposes that. There hasn't been no lies by Palin, there is no scandal in regards to Palin, and the only issue of sex has to do with HER DAUGHTER and not Sarah Palin, Notice also that the cover doesn't have Palin's husband Todd on it. Compare that too the MIchelle and Barack cover. Clearly the magazine wanted to paint a picture Barack's happy marriage to Michelle. I don't believe that Us Magazine created the edition featuring Sarah Palin just a few days after she was announced by John McCain, because they were fascinated by her and wanted to do a detailed story on her. It was clearly orchestrated. The owner of Us magazine Jann Wenner is also the owner of Rolling Stone Magazine, and it turns out that she is a BIG donor to Barack Obama. Did Jann have any input on the current edition or demand the hit piece be done? The contrast between the two editions is no cawansidance. For all the piling on by Obama's saragots and allies in the media. little do they know they are actually not fooling anyone. In a Rasmussen poll released last Thursday 51% of Americans believe the media is purposely trying to hurt Sarah Palin.
The media is made up of liberals, and liberals are always out of touch with mainstream America. There is a reason why the network news shows are losing viewers left and right. Newspapers are constantly cutting staff due to ever decreasing readers. People know there's a liberal bias in reporting. There are people that wouldn't have voted for the McCain Palin ticket the day McCain announced her, will vote for the ticket just out of spite over the media's coverage of Palin. The media should quit while it's behind, because it's not having any impact against Palin and McCain in the polls. The old saying is "you can have to much of a good thing". In the media's case "Reporting too much of negative things isn't leading to good things for them".