The deception of perception starring Michelle Obama.
08-26-2008
It's true, a sucker is born every minute. Very rarely if not ever will you find an educated street smart person that can be played for the role of a fool. Let's take the opening night of the Democrat National Convention for example. Michelle Obama was the main prime time speaker last night. Her speech on the surface was actually ok. She mentioned several times how she loves her country. Even I was choking back tears. Actually they were tears from laughing at how absolutely phony her words were. They're are Barack Obama supporters that really do believe that Michelle Obama loves this country. Little do they know how wrong they are. The media junkets last night kept saying that Michelle Obama "redeemed herself" for the "first time in my adult life I am proud of my country" comment. So how exactly did she "redeem" herself? Did the media junkets do a poll asking the people that were offended by her comments how they felt about her speech? This may come as a surprise, but anyone can write a speech they don't mean. It's one thing to give a speech in front of a national audience and say one thing, and it's another thing to say what you truly feel in front of a small non televised audience. Let me illustrate my point.
This is Michelle Obama at the University of South Carolina earlier this year giving a speech on "diversity".
Ask yourselves this question. How can a person claim Americans are ignorant in one breath yet say to love America in the next? While you all ponder that question, here's another question I have to ask. If Michelle Obama truly love her country like she said last night, why did she say also earlier this year "For the first time in my adult life time, I am proud of my country".
It's fascinating watching Obama supporters attack people like me saying that "we are lying" etc., yet the ones that are lying are Barack and Michelle. It's actually pretty sad that people are vigorously devoted to defending two individuals they truly don't know anything about. That's why a sucker truly is born every second. I almost forgot, here's the new and improved polished Michelle Obama that now loves her country speaking at the Democrat National Convention last night. I wonder who wrote her speech?
11 Comments:
Isn't politics supposed to be all about trickery, phony imagery, and highly polished teeth?
lol, good point space gopher. Trickery works with people that are easily fooled,
Some people enjoy being fooled and don't want to see the light.
What I find interesting is that suddenly Obama is yesterday's news with McCain's choice of VP. I guess that speech wasn't so memorable after all now was it?
I can't wait for the left to try to go after her...
Talk about tap dancing on a land mine!
Talk about pandering...boy oh boy, this one takes the cake! McCains picks a woman as his..uh, errh.., the "Republican party's" choice, and her first comments are; "Hillary left 18 million cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America."
Frankly, I have no problem with a woman as VP or President. But the fact remains that McCain made his choice strictly based on "election" politics. Oh well.. I guess you can't attack her on inexperience in foreign policy. After all she is from Alaska, which is right next to Russia...(lol)(hat-tip to Steve Doocy...what a flake)
p allen"Talk about pandering...boy oh boy, this one takes the cake! McCains picks a woman as his..uh, errh.., the "Republican party's" choice, and her first comments are; "Hillary left 18 million cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America.""
Oh please allen spare me. Ever since Friday when McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate. Liberals have been attacking her name non stop. You can call it pandering all you want, I call it pure political brillance on his part. All you see is the woman aspect to Palin Allen. You forget that she is about to attract the rural voters that Obama says that cling to their guns and religion. Furthermore, by she being a conservative, she sures up the conservative support behind McCain, on top of that, she is NOT A WASHINGTON INSIDER like Biden, and last she has executive experience as a governor and as a mayor. So if you are going to focus on her gender fine, but at least look at the whole package allen lol.
CB;"All you see is the woman aspect to Palin Allen."
I said her gender did'nt matter to me, but it did matter to McCain and the "Republican VP selection" circle. You're not stupid Tyrone, it's obvious why he chose a woman. He's using her like a "tool"...
Do you really think she's the "right" person to be just a heartbeat from the presidency? Do you dispise liberals so much that you are willing to allow a presidential ticket, a "cheap election political ploy"?
Imagine if Hillary had been the nominee. It's true that some Blacks would have been so disgruntled that they would have turned from her to McCain. What would McCain choice have been then?? Michael Massey? Ward Connerly? Perhaps Jesse Lee Peterson!!
I dont' particularly agree with Michael Savage's politics, but even he see's the Palin choice for what it's worth.
I agree with you Conservative Brother ... McCain's choice for a running mate in selecting Palin is brilliant. I used the same word to describe my opinion on his selection the moment I read the news on CNN.
I also agree with you on other points; attracting the rural voters and ensuring the conservative vote.
I am a conservative, live in a rural community by choice, work in corporate to support myself, own a gun for protection, own three dogs, a christian who makes no apologies and believes the bible is the inerrant word of God.
I am voting McCann/Palin and praying that this nation will somehow understand that the path it is on is flying in the face of God and will turn back to a country who follows the God We Trust ... and mean it. Otherwise, I am truly afraid we will find an abortion showing up on our health care benefits as a covered and common procedure, a weak and antiquated military system, a loss of power in the global community and an open door to radical terrorists and their leaders ... we will lose our comfort and freedom as we have never experienced. Hindsight is 20/20 ... I am praying we don't have to look back and say we wish we had done differently ... America ... please wake up!
Barbara says;"I am truly afraid we will find an abortion showing up on our health care benefits as a covered and common procedure, a weak and antiquated military system, a loss of power in the global community and an open door to radical terrorists and their leaders"
Politics of fear...
You're so afraid you don't even see that all of your "fears" have been realized by the current administration or previous Republicans...
Abortion- Although lower now, the country's abortion rate peaked in 1981, at 29.3 per 1,000 women. At the time Ronald Reagan was the president. In 2 consecutive terms, only once has the Bush administration addressed the issue, which was entirely due to a U.S. Supreme Court Case on Partial Birth Abortion.
Weak Military and the Global Community- Presently our military forces are stretched to the hilt...in a war and a country where it's leaders have asked us to leave, and literally no support from the majority of the global community.
Radical Terrorist/Open Door- In 2 consecutive terms the flow of illegals across the Mexican border has not been curtailed. It was Bush and McCain who fashioned the 1986 Reagan styled amnesty for illegals, a repeat of a plan even conservatives rejected.
Over 2 consecutive Bush terms, more Americans have been killed by foreign (so-called "terrorist") nationals since the Vietnam war. Let's no forget that 911 happened on BUSH'S watch!
And your fears are what??? That Obama will do the same as the Republicans???
Wow P. Anthony ... are you angry or what?!!
My fears haven't yet been realized ... thank God ... and I don't vote based on fear. I vote based on conviction.
Obama wants to reduce our arms and development of protective arms. Yeah, with the current global radical people and their politics ... that scares me ... you bet ... especially after 9/11 where we trained the terrorists how to fly our planes and watched as they drove our planes into our buildings and killed our people. I don't believe a weaker military is the answer.
Obama is for abortion with such conviction that he voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act three times to my knowledge ... there's more on that if you care to google the BAIPA.
The illegal immigrants from Mexico are not coming here to kill you, P. Anthony. They are coming here to work ... illegally. Not at all what I referenced previously in opening the door to more terrorism. Surely, you see the difference.
I expect you will write some caustic response ... I will leave you with that as you obviously don't respect opinion and prefer to attack rather than debate.
Barbara says;"Wow P. Anthony ... are you angry or what?!!
No I'm not angry Barbara... At times I may appear caustic and brash, but I mean no harm.
Barbara says;"Obama wants to reduce our arms and development of protective arms."
No president has ever reduced or other stripped our military of "protective armament", and contrary to your beliefs, no president ever will...
Barbara says;"Obama is for abortion with such conviction that he voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act three times to my knowledge "
The Born Alive Act is a Federal Law that cannot be overridden. If you think Obama wants to kill babies, that's your right. I don't believe he does, and would only believe it if he; 1. said it, or 2. campaigned to have the law overturned.
Barbara says;"The illegal immigrants from Mexico are not coming here to kill you, P. Anthony. They are coming here to work ... illegally."
Most conservatives pundits make "high light" of the fact that some illegals come here specifically to commit crimes (such as murder and mayhem). The most well know citizen group opposing illegal immigration is The Minuteman Group. Their mission statement clearly states an opposition to "foreign military." Perhaps you think the Minutemen are right-wing kooks.
Barbara;"especially after 9/11 where we trained the terrorists how to fly our planes and watched as they drove our planes into our buildings and killed our people."
Again,,, 911 happened on Bush's watch. Come on now, there's only two ways to look at it. One, Bush dropped the ball, which allowed the terrorist an opening for the attack. Or two, Bush had something to do with the attack. Take your pick!
Post a Comment
<< Home