More words of infinite "wisdom" from Obama's "Green Jobs" czar Van Jones.
Calling George Bush a crack is suppose to be funny?, When Obama is called a socialist, these same people who laughed at Bush then all of a sudden stick their lips out and pout and cry. As for Jones, I guess it takes a crack head to know a crack head, just like it takes a community organizer to know another community organizer. Once again, people are judged by the company they keep. Within twenty four hours of John McCain announcing Sarah Palin as his Vice President running mate, the media went in overdrive asking the question "was Sarah Palin vetted? The media has been pretty quiet about Van Jones being vetted by Obama. This is why people have a problem with the creation of Czar positions by Obama. No vetting is necessary. If Van Jones had to be confirmed by congress, there would be no way in hell he would be confirmed, Obama can pick any kooky radical wing nut he wants and congress doesn't have a say. Let Van Jones serve as an example to that. What am I thinking? If people would ask whether Van Jones was "vetted", liberal flakes would just claim that the people who wanted Jones vetted were "racial profiling" Jones.
6 Comments:
CB;"I may be wrong, but I don't recall any other president doing such a thing. A lot of parents are planning on pulling out their children that day".
Yet they did not scoff when Reagan or Bush Sr. did the same...
If Reagan and Bush did it and took no heat from Democrats or the left, why is the right-wing so mobilized in there efforts to prevent their kids from hearing a speech by the President of the United States???
Because you "think" he's a socialist, Marxist, communist, racist is not a good answer!!! He is the duly elected President of the United States, elected by the people of this country.
Somebody ain't tellin' what's really on their mind....
You are convientely dancing around the what I wrote Allen. I said that Bush and Reagan's Department of Education never required teachers to have students read books that promoted their ideology. You are glossing over what is required of students BEFORE Obama gives his speech allen. Nice try
p allen "Because you "think" he's a socialist, Marxist, communist, racist is not a good answer!!! He is the duly elected President of the United States, elected by the people of this country."
I "know" he's a Marxist. The evidence is all around. Your faith in Obama will never let you see who he truly is allen. Over and over again I told you that blind loyalty does make a person blind. Answer the question, why is it in the Sept 8th curriculum that students read a book on Obama? Just answer the question allen.
CB;"I said that Bush and Reagan's Department of Education never required teachers to have students read books that promoted their ideology".
NO! You said; "I may be wrong, but I don't recall any other president doing such a thing". You were wrong!
You also said;"The students are suppose to "READ A BOOK" about a Obama". Wrong! That's not what the agenda says. Go HERE and read it again!!
I've read the agenda's again and see nothing, about "anything" being "required." If there is PROVE IT!. Show where it's stated.
There are no suggestions or "requirements" for reading "Son of Promise, Child of Hope" there either. If there is PROVE IT!. Show where it's stated.
This is the same twisted idiocy and misinformation that prompted the "death panel" nonsense.
The only social agenda the president wishes to convey to students is "do well in school."
If indeed there were any type of social ideological political intent, religious proselytizing or a indoctrination of anything other than being a good American citizen, I would be the first to complain to the White House!
Tyrone, you have yet to prove any of your assertions. You've made two statements about the presidents speech that you cannot back up with facts. There is no mention of "required" reading of "Son of Promise, Child of Hope." There will be no mention of policy or indoctrination.
This entire "fake" position against the president speech to "SCHOOL CHILDREN" is baffling. Actually it's PATHETIC!!! This is a new low for right-wingers and conservatives in particular. Hating the president is one thing, but teaching your children to do it is beyond low.
CB;"I "know" he's a Marxist".
If you think Barack Obama is a Marxist, you don't know what a Marxist is! Simply because an American use's their freedoms to express a different political ideology doesn't make them a Marxist. Should you be called a "Despot" because you believe in your tightly knit conservative group, and want to rule with absolute political power??
The crazy "Despots" in the Republican party are taking it over. They want "THEIR" country back! I'm waiting for them to say exactly who is it they want "THEIR" country back from!!
As I said earlier, I'd like to know just how many parents will "follow blindly" behind the right-wing lunatic fringe and not send their kids to school on that day. The only lesson they can, and would learn is to fear a Black President of the United States!
CB;"Your faith in Obama will never let you see who he truly is allen".
The only man I ever truly put "faith" in, was my father.
But you're almost right about one thing. I don't "know" who he truly is, I'll admit that. However, our problematic disagreements exist because you "THINK" you do know who or what he is.
The only thing you know about him is that you hate his politics. You definitely don't know if President Obama is a Marxist. You've taken Rush Limbaugh's, Michael Savage's and Ann Coulters demonizing views as truth. It is these taking head pundits that give you your views.
I listen to Limbaugh, Coulter and Savage. And I don't think for one second that these pundits are not squarely settled in what they want for America. In no way are they "blinded" by any particular ideology. They have a clear-cut "spoken" agenda that requires no "fake terms" or misrepresentation of their thoughts. Yet, make no mistake, I disagree wholeheartedly with most, if not all of their views.
However, they don't grant they same idea's to their opponents. Instead they attempt to misrepresent and demonize their opponents, be they conservative, liberal, moderate or whatever! In my "OPINION" Tyrone, that's the part that I believe captures your imagination and "blinds" you to reality.
Even though these pundits are stead-fast in they views, they are aware of one other very important aspect of being a "talking head", a "radio" or a "TV" personality. THEY HAVE TO BE ENTERTAINING! In America media, controversy is entertainment.
Hell, Jerry Springer was the #1 talk show on television for 2 years straight! All that's needed is enough viewers/listeners to "BELIEVE" what their seeing (or hearing) and...voila'!
That is where "blind" allegiance comes into play. I never give my political loyalty, nor place my political faith in any man. I vote according to my personal beliefs, although not to the individual candidates, but to the political system. What I mean is, if a politician "says" something that I think is best for the political system, and the people as a whole, he can get my vote.
Conversely, you seem to vote for who you're "told" to vote for. Now that truly is blind allegiance.
Allen,
A Marxist is a Communist.
A Communist is the top of the "ism: chain.
All are godless, militaristic, and believe in a dictator.
Fascism-Mussolini of Italy
Marxism Communism Russia-Stalin
Marxist-Karl Marx was a Jew who converted to Luther to get over. The Roman Church was very anti Jewish in Europe so he became a Xtian and wrote the Communist Manifesto while he was in France.
He resigned.
Bill #1388 is bringing Palestinian Muslims to America with all expenses paid, no Pali Christians allowed. Pali Christians are being killed by the Muslims and he brings them here. Probably will go to Detroit where many already live or chicago or to Harvard where Harvard and Yale is controlled by Arab money.
Post a Comment
<< Home