Sunday, July 31, 2011

Contessa Brewer embarrassed herself while trying to upstage and embarrass someone else.

Contessa “white people showing up with guns” (insert cropped footage of black man with rifle) Brewer" made a fool out of herself yet again on MSBNC a few weeks ago. Contessea Brewer is a joke of a journalist on the channel that hired Al Sharpton. She hilariously made an absolute ass out of herself in an interview two weeks ago trying to upstage Republican Congressman Mo Brooks from Alabama on the issue of whether the bailout was needed back in 2008.



Poor Contessa didn't do her opposition research into the background of Mr. Brooks. Mo graduated from Duke University in three years with a double major in political science and economics, with highest honors in economics. In 1978, he graduated from the University of Alabama Law School." Look before you leap next time Contessa, like that is going to happen.

CNN "investigates" the personal finances of members in congress advocating controlling spenidng.

The media doesn't do investigative journalism reporting when they turn their attention to Republican or conservative members in congress. They do what is known as " political opposition research". That is exactly what CNN did, when they dug into the personal fiances of conservatives and Tea Party members of congress calling for a control in spending.



Leave it to CNN not to do their "research" into the financial backgrounds of Democrats who want to keep spending out of control, Oh no, no, no, that would have actually been a fair and balanced approach to journalism. CNN has low standards it must live up to. As I am always more then happy to point out, CNN has been last in the cable news ratings for over a decade for a reason. Their hit piece is a perfect example why. So certain Republicans have debt, is that really a story? Would CNN have done that story if the debt ceiling story didn't exist? What the pseudo journalists over at CNN did sounds like something the DNC Chairmwoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz would have ordered her operatives to do. CNN is known as being the sniper news network by the way. CNN didn't report to the American people that members of congress wouldn't have to be bound under Obamacare like the rest of the masses. The joke is on CNN if they think for one minute, they are coming across to the American people as being trustworthy. This story is just one more bit of evidence how transparently phony CNN is in their attempt to give the illusion that they are just reporting the news.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

MSNBC has taken one gigantic leap towards becoming a legitiate news channel.
















I can't believe I wrote that headline with a straight face. Here's something to ponder. If Fox News hired lets say David Duke and gave him a show, how would his hiring be received by the public? Clearly, it wouldn't go over well at all to say the least. Would the hiring of David Duke give more credibility to Fox News or drastically take away from it? I think everybody reading this obviously knows the answer to that question. It would destroy Fox's credibility overnight. With that said, I have to ask this question. How in the world can the hiring of the most famous race baiting agitator "Al Sharpton" be considered a plus for MSNBC, if it's looking to actually attract viewers? Al Sharpton doesn't have a journalistic resume, but his resume does indeed run deep and it isn't filled with him championing for racial haromony. Sharpton is know for the famous Tawana Brawley case, in which a black teenage girl made up a story that she was rapped by six white men. He blamed the media for blowing up the story, he defended her to the end. He never did apologize to the people he accused of rape once Twana's story fell apart.



I still can't get over it that one of the greatest racial dividers known next to Jesse Jackson is actually now a political news commentator? We can't forget that Al Sharpton has blood on his hands either. In 1995, Sharpton led a racially charged boycott against Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem. The boycott started when Freddy’s owners announced that because they wanted to expand their own business, they would no longer sublet part of their store to a black-owned record shop. The street leader of the boycott, Morris Powell, was also the head of Sharpton’s “Buy Black” Committee. Powell and his fellow protesters repeatedly and menacingly told passersby not to patronize the “crackers” and "the greedy Jew bastards [who are] killing our [black] people." Some boycotters openly threatened violence against whites and Jews––all under the watchful, approving eye of Sharpton, who referred to the proprietors of Freddy's as "white interlopers." The subsequent picketing became ever-more menacing in its tone until one of the participants eventually shot (non-fatally) four whites inside the store and then set the building on fire––killing seven employees, most of whom were Hispanics. Here's MSNBC latest addition in action talking about the debt ceiling vote.


MSNBC got rid of Keith "Olby" Olberman and picked up Al Sharpton?! Oh yeah, I can see MSNBC gaining credibility and viewers with this guy, NOT! Here's a little food for thought. If advertisers don't buy commercial time on Shaprton's show, will Sharpton lead boycotts against them in an attempt to try and label them as being "racists"? Something to think about.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Brother, can you spare a Trillion?

Don't worry, our country will never be in the financial mess that Greece finds itself in. The bad news is that we are in a much deeper and severe mess then Greece ever could ever be in. I guess in a way, they are the "lucky ones"?



It's amazing how the people who are standing up and trying to stop the government's out of control spending are the ones being labeled as the "extremists". Welcome to absurdastan. Can we afford four more years of Obama?

Sheila Jackson Lee wants to ignore the existance of Left Wing Extremism.

At the recent congressional hearing on Radical Islam in America, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee requested to the Chairman that there be a hearing into "Right Wing Extremism". I don't have any knowledge of a righting extremist gunning down sixty three people as the gunman did in Norway. Sheila Jackson Lee like other progressives want to simply ignore the fact that they are extremists on BOTH SIDES of the ideological divide.



Notice that Sheila Jackson Lee isn't too interested into having hearings into Left Wing Extremists groups. I guess there are no such thing according to her and other progressives. Reality doesn't go away however.



How about Ms. Lee request hearings into the Left Wing Extremist group known as the Earth Liberation Front. They aren't known to be very compassionate people.



If Ms. Lee doesn't find that particular Left Wing Extremist Group of interest, maybe she should call on hearings into the RACIST Left Wing extremist group known as the New Black Panthers.


For Sheila Jackson to Lee to ignore the extremism on her side of the ideological divide just shows that she really can care less about extremism overall. It's just a tool in which she and other progressives use to silence those on the right who aren't extremists. Ms. Lee is an extremist herself, so I would expect her to embrace what I said, surprise, surprise.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Hey, did you know that Republicans want to "destroy your rights"?

Live long enough, and you'll learn something new everyday. According to the wizard of smarts Nancy Pelosi, Republicans not only want to "destroy your rights", they also want to do the following.

Republicans want to "destroy food safety".
Republicans want to "destroy clean air".
Republicans want to " destroy clean water".
Republicans don't want children to get an education.

I need to send a thank you card to Nancy Pelosi. She "educated me". I now know that Republicans like to eat spoiled food, while breathing in dirty air, while drinking contaminated drinking water while being illiterate. I think that sums it up. If some didn't know better, they would have "mistaken" Nancy Pelosi of "fear mongering". We all know progressives would never do such a thing, right?


Tuesday, July 26, 2011

A Black progressive's ignorance on display. NAACP member attacks Tea Party and black conservatives.

Don't fall for the illusion that the NAACP represents "all" black people, it doesn't. If you are black and not liberal, you don't matter, and actually you are seen as a"traitor" to black people. If you aren't "down" with progressive "group think", you aren't down period. I've heard the lies and smears told by black progressives about the Tea Party being racists over the last two years. Of course the evidence has yet to materialize to validate their claims. Andrew Breitbart put up one hundred thousand dollars for progressives to provide the evidence, and no one to this day has come forward with evidence. Progressives are the walking, breathing talking definition of ignorance by example. Here is a black progressive member of the NAACP in South Central Los Angeles telling a reporter his thoughts on the Tea Party and black conservatives.



Group think and indoctrination goes hand and hand. This guy unfortunately is symbolic of how many none analytical thinking black adults "think". Facts are simply going to to bounce off of people like him like rubber bands. You can't reason with a person who is brainwashed beyond hope, you just have to see them as the enemy they are and defeat them and their ignorance. Case in point, this person said that “These “sell-out negroes” wish they were white". So using logic, does that mean that "white progressives are sellouts who wish they were black"? I wish I could ask him that question just to gauge his response, but I wouldn't want to make him more confused and angry then he already is. Member of group think indoctrination aren't very tolerable of others who are free thinking analytical thinkers.

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Note to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, "Don't start fires if you can't stand being burned".









I really don't like Debbie Wasserman Schultz. When I say that, I MEAN I REALLY DON'T LIKE HER. She is a vile, manipulating human being. Early this week on the floor of congress, Debbie Wasserman lied and smeared Allen West about his position on the debt ceiling. She lied in saying that Congressman West wants to cut medicare benefits for seniors. She made her comments about West after he already left the house chamber and wasn't around to respond to what she purposely lied about.



When Allen West heard what Debbie Wasserman Schultz said, he sent her this now infamous email pretty much telling her off and exposing her for her piece of garbage that she is.

From: Z112 West, Allen
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 04:48 PM
To: Wasserman Schultz, Debbie
Cc: McCarthy, Kevin; Blyth, Jonathan; Pelosi, Nancy; Cantor, Eric
Subject: Unprofessional and Inappropriate Sophomoric Behavior from Wasserman-Schultz

Look, Debbie, I understand that after I departed the House floor you directed your floor speech comments directly towards me. Let me make myself perfectly clear, you want a personal fight, I am happy to oblige. You are the most vile, unprofessional ,and despicable member of the US House of Representatives. If you have something to say to me, stop being a coward and say it to my face, otherwise, shut the heck up. Focus on your own congressional district!

I am bringing your actions today to our Majority Leader and Majority Whip and from this time forward, understand that I shall defend myself forthright against your heinous characterless behavior……which dates back to the disgusting protest you ordered at my campaign hqs, October 2010 in Deerfield Beach.

You have proven repeatedly that you are not a Lady, therefore, shall not be afforded due respect from me!

Steadfast and Loyal

Congressman Allen B West (R-FL)

Of course everything that Congressman said about Ms. Schultz is dead on accurate. What she did was wrong, and the sad part is that if given the chance, she would be more then happy to do it again. Well, the story doesn't end there, surprise, surprise. Somehow Allen's private email found its way into certain media outlets and Democratic special interest groups, and they are now "expressing their outrage over Congressman West's comments".



It is beyond laughable and insane that Allen is even being asked to apologize to Debbie in the first place. She lied about him. She attacked him. If Debbie was a man, this wouldn't even be an issue. Some are trying to spin the narrative as Allen West being the big, bad military Republican bully attacking the innocent, sugar and spice and everything nice female Democrat Debbie "the saint" Wasserman Schultz. Allen made reference in his interview with Stewart Varney about Debbie attacking his character back in 2010. This is the angel Debbie Wasserman Schultz talking about then congressional candidate Allen West.



Allen Westwears his extreme disrespect as a badge of honor?
Allen West thinks is acceptable to objectify and denigrate women?
Allen West wants to take away women's "reproductive freedom?

I didn't know abortion had to do with reproduction, I thought it had to do with "termination".
As you can see, even back then, she told lie after lie after lie about Allen West. No wonder he sent her that email, I would have done the same thing if I was in his shoes. She had it coming. As Allen also said in his interview, that email was suppose to have been private. Debbie made it public to gin up fake outage among her Democratic special interest base. As soon as she released the email in the attempt to portray herself as the victim, Democratic progressive fake women rights groups immediately attacked Allen West and attempted to smear him as being a "sexist". Since Allen is black, the race card won't work against him, so they have to use the sexist card instead. I wish they had this much outrage when their own were calling Sarah Palin far worse things then what Allen said to Debbie. I sent an email to Allen West yesterday expressing my support for standing up against the lies and smears of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and also not backing down from what he said about her in his email. What is it with progressives and their lack of integrity? Now I know why Allen West is a rising conservative star.

Meet the latest member to the Anthony Weiner can't keep it in his pants club.














Democratic Congressman David Wu from Oregon has been a bad boy. No, he wasn't taking pictures of his unit and sending them all over the Internet like former Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner. Congressman Wu may have done much worse. Democratic Congressman David Wu is in the middle of a sex scandal with the allegation being that he had an “unwanted sexual encounter” with the teenage daughter of a longtime friend. There is a simple four letter word to describe that statement. The word is "RAPE" of course. Some friend David may have turned out to be. Democratic Congressman David Wu said "This is very serious, and I have absolutely no desire to bring unwanted publicity, attention or stress to a young woman and her family". What he is really saying is "how in the world can I make this situation not blow up to the level that took down Anthony Weiner". Apparently Mr. Wu has a long history of troubling sexual incidents. He's right now being treated for a "mental health condition". I guess Viagra won't help him with that. As House Majority Speaker back in 2006, Nancy Pelosi said something about "You must drain the swamp if you are going to govern for the people". Well it looks like a sexual predator may be in her side of the swamp, what will she do about it?

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Rahm Emanuel will send his kids this fall to the same "PRIVATE" school Obama sent his kids.

Elite progressives want the masses to support the public education system. They talk in great length on why it is important to the development of America's youth, but their very own words seem to ring hollow, when it is time to send their children to school. You see, elite progressives can't have their precious children rubbing elbows with the great unwashed masses of American youths in the public school system. Ask now Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel what I mean by that.


The only reason why democratic politicians champion public schools is because, the teacher unions are major supporters and contributors of their campaigns and party . As usual, follow the money. It's fascinating how democrats can boldly tell people that the Republican Party is the "party of rich", when it's elite democrats who are the ones sending their kids to the same schools as the affluent send their kids. In other words, they are hypocrites as usual. It's also very telling that those same democratic politicians who send their kids to private schools are the ones blocking any attempts by Republicans to create a voucher system in which low income families can have a chance to give their children the same quality of education as the democratic politician can afford to give to his children. Progressives use the word "equality", but obviously they don't truly believe in the word. Rahm is just a typical fraudulent elitist pretending to be just like "everybody else".

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Herman is raising cain on Romney presumably not being electable.

It appears Ronald Reagan's eleventh commandment has been tossed aside by Herman Cain. Reagan said "Thou shall not speak ill of another republican". I loved Reagan, but I never accepted nor embraced that commandment. I've always spoken much more then ill of any liberal, moderate or neo conservative republican. Herman Cain apparently feels the same way as I am many traditional conservatives do. He's taking the gloves off early against the GOP front runner Mitt "Mittens" Romney. Since I am not a fan of Romney, I really can't fault Herman on this approach. Recently at a function, Herman Cain brought up several key points that some Republicans might not want to hear nor accept, but the points are still very validate on why Romney can't win the nomination nor the presidency.



When Obama came out and said that Obamacare was basically patented off of Romneycare, what can Mitt Romney say to that?



A lot of people want Obamacare repealed, and they have a very uneasy feeling listening to the man who created the Massachusetts prototype for Obamacare saying that if he is elected, he will do way with Obamacare. The repeal of Obamacare is way too important to just elect Romney and "hope" he does what he promised. As for the south, Herman is right again. Romney did terrible in the south. Romney is a Northeastern Republican. In many ways, Mitt Romney comes off appearing and sounding like the Republican version of John Kerry. I said back during the 2008 primaries that Mike Huckabee made it possible for John McCain to win the Republican nomination. In the overall delegate count, Romney only won 271 delegates to McCain's 1575. Though I believe independents voted in open Republican primaries, the fact remains that Romney was slaughtered. I also took a look at the results from the southern states, and Herman was right. Romney didn't win any southern states. In what are the three crucial battle ground states in a presidential election, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Romney lost in all three of those states in the primaries. The saying goes, "Don't hate the messenger, hate the message". Republicans and conservatives need to take to heart what Cain said, because everything he said was factually accurate. I joke on Mittens, but I don't dislike him personally. I know how some conservatives point out the supposed flaws of say a Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann, well these same folks should put on the magnifying glasses and take a good hard look at Mitt Romney's obvious flaws. As for Mitt's religion, I wish it wouldn't' be an issue, because it shouldn't' be an issue. Barack Obama came from one very theologically warped and racist church, and he was elected president. So in the perfect world, if Barry can get elected president why not Mitt? Unfortunately, this isn't a perfect world where two sides of a coin aren't judged equally. I predict other candidates will also start to turn their knives away from Obama and redirect them towards Romney also as the Iowa Caucus approaches.

Monday, July 18, 2011

San Francisco Police shoot and kill a 19 year old black teenager.

When you think about police brutality in California, the Los Angeles Police Department is normally the first one to pop into mind. Well it looks like they may have some competition from a police department that is stationed in a city that is suppose to represent non violence, peace love and compassion. Early this morning, a 19 year old "unarmed" black teenager was shot and killed by two San Francisco Police officers. Apparently the shooting began after two uniformed officers conducted a fair inspection on a Municipal light rail vehicle. They detained the man on the platform, but he fled on foot. During the foot pursuit, police said the suspect fired at the officers, and the officers fired back.



In the video, you can hear bystanders demanding to be shown the victim’s gun, which wasn't visible. If it is discovered that the teen was unarmed, I expect this tragic incident to explode in the coming days, because the victim was black and the officers were white and Hispanic.. This is the second transit shooting in San Francisco in two weeks. It is being reported that the 19 year old who was shot was a suspect in a murder in Seattle of a 19 year old female and her unborn baby.

The Tea Party is responsible for Barack Obama not being "transformational" or something.

It looks like another progressive wizard of smarts has taken a swing for the fences and has come up short. CNN's political analyst Gloria Borger made a revelation on why Obama hasn't become that mythical transformational president people who voted for him thought he was going to be. It's not, because Obama never planned on being a transformational president in the first place, because he is nothing more then a calculating, manipulating, pathological liar. Nope, it had to be because of an external force beyond Barack Obama's control. Take it away Gloria.



So there you have it. It's those darn racist, crazy tea party folks who have hijacked the Republican Party who are responsible for Barack Obama not becoming a transformational president. I wonder how many lines of coke did Gloria Borger snort in order to have come up with such a ridiculous conclusion? The Tea Party candidates didn't start running for congress until 2010. When Obama was sworn in as president, he had full control of congress, because Harry Reid was the majority leader in the senate and Nancy Pelosi was the house majority leader. Does Gloria Borger suffer from ultra short term memory loss? During the time from January of 2009 to January of 2011, I wonder could Gloria tell us what exactly did Barack, Pelosi and Reid compromise on with the then Republican minority?. Where was the compromise when Obamacare was being crafted behind closed doors and republicans were locked out? I wonder what Gloria had to say then? I despise intellectually dishonest people. This is another reason why once again the people have such a distrust for the national media. I remember when Nancy Pelosi as the house majority leader turned off the lights and killed the microphones on John Boehner and Republicans as they were debating about energy policy. The Tea Party members in congress are a minority, yet we are suppose to believe that they have the power to stop Obama from being "transformational", give me a break Gloria.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Thanks Chris. It's nice to know that as a conservative blogger, I am doing my part to help annoy the hell out of you.

It's so fulfilling to be apart of a movement that is bigger then one's self. I've been sharing my thoughts and exposing liberals for who they are for more then five years now. It is so gratifying to hear a bleached blond, half witted liberal news commentator host admit that they don't have a monopoly on the news and public opinion, and that conservative bloggers are a sharp thorn in their sides on issues such as the debt ceiling debate. Here's to many more years of pissing you and you allies off Chris Matthews.



Why spoil the fun now? Here's to many more years Chris and other progressives who want to silence us, because they can't defeat us.



Saturday, July 16, 2011

Why is it that conservative women bring out the vileness in liberals?

In October of 2008, the "comedian" Sandra Bernhard said that "If Sarah Palin ever comes to New York, she would be gang rapped by her big black brothers".



Progressives didn't find anything wrong with what Sandra said, they claimed it was just a joke. The NAACP had nothing to say. The feminist organizations went into hiding. A women's shelter where Sandra Bernhard was schedule to do a show canceled her appearance when her comments were aired. I am not a fan of progressive ideology. Even with that said, I don't advocate the raping of women who are progressives. I wouldn't even joke about something like that. It isn't even funny in the least. Progressives on the other hand don't share the same moral mindset as normal, decent minded people do. Bill Maher is a piece of crap, the people he had on his panel the other day made him look like a saint. Before you watch this video, remember that Michelle Bachmann is a wife, a mother and a grandmother. Parental Advisory is advised for vile and crude language.



This was beyond vile. I wonder will Keith Ellison speak out on this? I heard the audience laughing at this, but where exactly is the humor factor in this? I know progressives want to claim conservatives are the true "hate mongers" when it comes to the treatment of women. Does this sound like "peace, love and tolerance" from a liberal towards a woman who has an opposing point of view? Parental Advisory is advised for use of strong language.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Another case of liberal fear mongering starring Congressman Keith Ellison of Minnesota.

Michelle Bachmann must be gaining traction, because liberals are now starting to go into Palinize mode on her. Congressman Keith Ellison recently spoke at the 2011 Campus Progress National Conference in Minnesota, and he said that women like Michelle Bachmann wants women barefoot, pregnant and back in the kitchen. I wish I could ask him what research he used to come to that ignorant collusion. Of course it never dawned on Keith that it was conservative men who voted for a woman to represent them in congress. It's conservative men who believe in limited government who support women like Sarah Palin. Progressives like Keith Ellison love giving speeches at colleges, because the students are just as ignorant as they are. Let's get real. Back in 2008, who were the ones who pushed the female "Hillary Clinton" aside in favor of a man child "Barack Obama"? It wasn't those folks who believe in limited government, was it? Maybe Keith should ask conservative women like Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin and other conservative women, have conservative men told them to "get back in the kitchen". Fear Mongering only works, when people are gullible enough to buy into it. It didn't take long for the ignorance of what Mr. Ellison said to catch the ears of actual strong independent women.



This is how women are treated in Mr. Keith Ellison's religion of Islam. I wonder why he didn't bring that up while he was speaking about "women equality" and "women rights in the era of extremism"?



My two cents which is far more valuable then Keith Ellison's no scene. Look at your religion Keith for how barbaric it is towards women before you make false claims against men who believe in limited government in this country.

Naughty Michelle hasn't been eating her veggies lately.













Obama wants Americas to fiscally "eat their peas". He should tell his wife to psychically eat the ones in her vegetable garden. It would only be like for her to do so, since she is sphere heading the White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity. Back in March of last year, she claimed she wanted to end Childhood Obesity in a generation. I'm from the old school way of thinking on this issue. Silly me believes that the parents should be responsible for making sure their children eat healthy, but that's just me. I'm just not in sync with the whole "it takes a village to raise a child" mindset. Even though I don't agree with Michelle's cause, I did respect her "dedication" at the time to be somewhat of a role model for kids to eat healthy.

I however forgot the golden rule of liberals. They are hypocrites first and foremost. While Michelle Obama was telling kids they had to eat healthy, she wasn't exactly living up to her own words. She more or so ate her words. A few days ago in Washington D.C, Michelle Obama was spotted at a fast food burger joint known as Shack Shack. As you all probably can tell from the name, Shake Shack isn't known for serving seaweed, kelp or tofu burgers. Michelle ordered a 1700 calorie ShackBurger, fries, chocolate shake and Diet Coke. A diet coke, really Michelle?

So once again, we have another case of a self righteous liberal basically telling others to " do as I say not as I do". At least when Oprah fell off the junk food wagon, she admitted she did wrong in her diet. Frankly, fast food restaurants like McDonalds, Burger King and others should tell their critics "If fast food is good enough for the first lady, then it's good enough for the kids",right?

Saturday, July 09, 2011

In Atlanta, did they "do it for the children"?













While the outdated relic aka the NAACP is engaging in the newest and greatest Civil Rights struggle of our time, the lack of diversity in "CNN's prime time line up", there is something that has happened in Atlanta that the NAACP might want to focus it's attention on instead. Progressives tell us they are the ones who champions the causes of blacks and that their actions when it comes to education is because, "it's all about the children". Well I wonder if it's in the best interest of black students in Atlanta to have them be nothing more then functioning illiterates? It has just been discovered this week that 178 teachers and 38 principals in the Atlanta Public School system were fudging the grades of failing students in order to pass them, and this had been going on for OVER A DECADE!



The cheating scandal has the sad honor of being the biggest cheating scandal in American history that was committed by teachers and principals. I can't stress the hypocrisy element in all of this. It's teachers and principals who are suppose to set the example for students NOT TO CHEAT, yet the ones in Atlanta were doing just that. It gets worse. The Atlanta Public Schools Superintendent Beverley Hall actually received in 2009 the "Superintendent of the Year" award!


Ms. Hall resigned in June due to the increasing spotlight that was being shined on the questionable achievement in the APS. Teaching is suppose to be a noble profession, so what was the reason behind teachers and principals cheating on behalf of the students they were suppose to be educating? Did they believe they were "helping" those students? How many tens of thousands of students in Atlanta have been in essence screwed out of an education? Lets hear the excuse.

This is what it looks like when a person of ignorance tries to debate a person grounded in common sense.

CNBC on air editor Rick Sentelli has to be one of the few people on CNBC that actually exercises logical thinking. It's amazing that CNBC which is suppose to be a financial network has so many people working for it, yet many of them are utterly clueless, when it comes to understanding why the ever continuing increase in the federal debt ceiling is actually a bad thing to do. I give Rick all the credit in the world, because he is a man who understands logic. The other day Rick had a debate on air with a simpleton by the name of Michael Farr. Watch the exchange, and tell me who made more sense.

Thursday, July 07, 2011

Remember when democrats said that there need to be a "new tone in civility"?

I guess the leader of the Democratic Party feels that the new tone doesn't apply to him.



Since Sarah Palin was used as a whipping post by the media and the left for what they called "violent rhetoric", because her Political Action Committee used cross hairs on it's website. The media and the left tried to make a connection between the cross hairs on Congresswoman Gabriel Gifford's district and the Tuscon shooter.



I wonder will they condemn Obama just as equally for his "use of not so non violent rhetoric language"?

So Republicans are putting "guns to the heads of the American people"?

Monday, July 04, 2011

Happy 235th birthday America!!

Friday, July 01, 2011

Herman Cain raises cain on "Obama's failure to lead"

I'm not counting Herman out as a first tier candidate come next year. The first attack ad by the Herman Cain team entitled "A Failure to Lead" is simply awesome! The attack ads by Mittens and T Pawl did a great job also of attacking Obama's failures, but Herman Cain's ad goes after the core principals and influences of Obama. Once a person can understand who were the people who influenced Obama , it becomes much easier to understand why he is governing the way he is. In Cain's ad, it mentions that a person is judged by the company he or she keeps. Not only are people judged by the company they keep, they are also influenced by that company as well.

Frank Marshall Davis
Jeremiah Wright
Al Sharpton
Louis Farrakhan
Marxist Professors
Union Leaders
AACORN etc etc