Sunday, June 14, 2015

Spokane Washington's NAACP leader Rachael Dolezal was black before she was white or is that vice versa?












Jeepers Scobby!! The mystery of the racial identity of the Spokane Washington's NAACP President Rachael Dolezal has been solved!! Rachael Dolezal would have gotten away with it if it weren't for those darn meddling kids or in her case her parents.


Many on the right have said for decades that liberalism is a mental disorder, and I guess that would include the disease of  progressive "white guilt". Ms Dolezal once said back in 2010 that "She could not imagine "showing her face" at at tea party event", she continued "to her what stands out is the "all white crowds"!! So a mentally screwed up white woman trying to pose as being black would have been nervous going to an event she perceived as being all white? With liberals, the truth seems to always be stranger then fiction. I've documented the lunacy and sheer insanity of these people for a long time, but this takes the cake and the pie!! I suppose if Rachael Dolezal ever did attend a tea party event as "herself", she could be said  to be going maybe "incognegro". So will the Spokane Washington NAACP be renamed as the NAAWWPAB short for the National Association for the Advancement of White Women Posing As Black? I wouldn't be surprised if Rachael's biological parents who are both white are attacked by liberals for ratting her out and stating that she is indeed white. Let's face it, in the whacked out progressive fantasy land known as their warped reality, logic doesn't have to make sense, it just matters what feels good to them or what they can identify as even though they are not.

In the world of progressive logic, it would stand to reason that Ms. Dolezal will keep her job as the Spokane's NAACP leader, because the NAACP board and other progressives would claim that "her heart was in the right place", her obvious mental illness won't even play a factor.

13 Comments:

Blogger p. anthony allen said...

First off, I think that "passing" for another race has it's roots based in low self-esteem and self worth. Dolezal, in my opinion is just a phony and a liar. For the last several years the NAACP has promoted racial and gender diversity among its ranks. So there was no need for Dolezal to "impersonate" a black person.

But as usual Tyrone, you've made a political ideology angle where there clearly isn't one. This situation has nothing to do with political ideology. So I'll have to ask, if passing for black is a "liberal mental disorder", is passing for white a "conservative mental disorder?" There are plenty of documented cases of blacks knowingly, and unknowingly, passing for white. Is their race passing rooted in a political ideology?

12:21 AM  
Anonymous Vincent said...

Howard Stern once said, "Everyone wants to be a superhero." That would be nice, but it's not reality.
This woman wants to help people, but she also wants to play the martyr, to be down with the struggle, I think, to feel superior to her "oppressors". It's a nice little fantasy to feel good about yourself.

1:20 PM  
Blogger renee xuereb said...

Just another taste of the lunacy of liberalism! The NAAACP should rename themselves as the National Association for the Advancement of Counterfeit People!

1:27 PM  
Blogger Miss Marty said...

How much White Guilt was she fed that she vomited up a new "black" version of herself? I wish liberals would learn from this that blaming whites for everything is going to result in some insane outcomes.

My favorite part was all the fake "hate crimes" she staged against herself.

8:30 PM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

Just read a story that in 2002, as a white woman, Dolezal sued historically black Howard University for racial discrimination. This story gets stranger by the day.

Its obvious that Dolezal is a liar and a fraud. She has serious personal self-esteem issues. But here again, its not the problem of the NAACP, Howard University, or "the liberals." As I stated earlier, her problem is personal and based in her own personal perceptions. Being black is not a political ideology.

However, if you'd like to make it a political ideology issue, (which it is NOT) lets look at all the facts surrounding Dolezal. She sued Howard for discriminating against her because she was white. Most "conservatives" believe that there is no need for racially oriented organizations and educational institutions. That being the case, her perceived "reverse discrimination" by Howard university was "cause de jure" political ideology for conservatives.

I would bet a dime to a dollar that most conservatives (and as her being a white woman) would have supported her racial discrimination lawsuit. You yourself Tyrone have repeatedly proposed the idea that there is no need for organizations such as the NAACP and HBCU's. So if you really, really, really, really want to make it an political ideological issue Tyrone, show some support for her discrimination suit (when she was white) against those unnecessary black organizations and educational institutions.

5:33 PM  
Blogger Alpha Conservative Male said...

p allen "First off, I think that "passing" for another race has it's roots based in low self-esteem and self worth. Dolezal, in my opinion is just a phony and a liar. For the last several years the NAACP has promoted racial and gender diversity among its ranks. So there was no need for Dolezal to "impersonate" a black person."

Which means allen that no "normal,sane person" would have gone the route Rachel Dolezal took, wihc goes back to my original statement of her being nuttier then a almond joy candy bar.

p allen "But as usual Tyrone, you've made a political ideology angle where there clearly isn't one. This situation has nothing to do with political ideology. So I'll have to ask, if passing for black is a "liberal mental disorder", is passing for white a "conservative mental disorder?" There are plenty of documented cases of blacks knowingly, and unknowingly, passing for white. Is their race passing rooted in a political ideology?"

Up oh, you stepped into it now. Sit down and let me lecture to you a bit on this. Liberals hate America for the most part. That isn't news. They trash it based on race, from attacking Christopher Columbus, to the white settlers who came to the new world. Hell listen to your pal Obama "WHITE MAN'S GREED runs a world in need" which he was talking about American (white)capitalism being evil. Who are the ones who came up with term "white privilege" allen? It wasn't the right wing conspiracy who did it. I can post many articles and videos if you want of liberals bashing America as a "racist" society. Just say the word. Let me go just one step further. Liberals are the ones who call black conservatives or Republicans "OREOS". Oh yeah, that's right they do don't they? They claim that a person like myself is "TRYING TO BE WHITE". What do they possibly mean by that allen? Here's my "theory". Liberals do not like black who don't see this country through the same racism prism as they do. To liberals, patriotism aka love of country and it's values is "WHITE THING".SOOOOOO, if any black person is actually patriotic to America and supports it, they are seen by liberals as "trying to be white" thus an "Oreo". Lecture over.I white liberal called me an Oreo once. I said to him, if I am trying to white because I am a conservative then as you are white, are you trying to be black by being a liberal? That question short circuited his thought process. He wasn't expecting that response, poor thing.

10:05 PM  
Blogger Alpha Conservative Male said...

Vincent said..."Howard Stern once said, "Everyone wants to be a superhero." That would be nice, but it's not reality.
This woman wants to help people, but she also wants to play the martyr, to be down with the struggle, I think, to feel superior to her "oppressors". It's a nice little fantasy to feel good about yourself."

After the riots, I made a remark to a friend of mine saying that this was the first time I could ever remember seeing white folks in the Penn North area. They are long gone now since the cameras left. In an odd way, I actually have more respect for Rachel Dozal then I do for other white liberals who claim to all about standing up for blacks. Of course Rachael is insane in the membrane and is a fraud, but at least her actions weren't dependent on television cameras filming her to exploit herself. I will give her that much.

Miss Marty said "
How much White Guilt was she fed that she vomited up a new "black" version of herself? I wish liberals would learn from this that blaming whites for everything is going to result in some insane outcomes.My favorite part was all the fake "hate crimes" she staged against herself."

I heard her resignation speech. She sounded like she was apart of the New Black Panthers or something. lol I would like to know who got a hold of her brain and used a power drill in order to screw it up so badly. Something obviously happened to her as a child for her to turn out this way. Her credibility is shot beyond shot to the point of being overkill. Of course her claims about her being a victim of a hate crime is a lie. She'll probably land a job on MSNBC or NBC News. She can take Brian William's spot. The progressive blame game has been going on for 50 years with no fruit to bear other the legions of blacks who have been suckered into believing that somehow they are victims of a "mysterious invisible but white force"

10:05 PM  
Blogger Alpha Conservative Male said...

p allen "Its obvious that Dolezal is a liar and a fraud. She has serious personal self-esteem issues. But here again, its not the problem of the NAACP, Howard University, or "the liberals." As I stated earlier, her problem is personal and based in her own personal perceptions. Being black is not a political ideology. "

BS!!!!! Tens of millions of people have low self-esteem, and they don't do what Rachael Dolezal did. Face it allen, the woman is nuts and I am not talking planters. It's not the problem of liberals you say? Interesting, listen to her resignation speech, she sure sounded like a social justice, white guilt liberal. Being black is not a political ideology you also say? Funny but it's the liberal ideology some liberals to racially attack blacks for not being politically aligned with them is it not? Care for an "OREO" allen? :-)

p allen "However, if you'd like to make it a political ideology issue, (which it is NOT) lets look at all the facts surrounding Dolezal. She sued Howard for discriminating against her because she was white. Most "conservatives" believe that there is no need for racially oriented organizations and educational institutions. That being the case, her perceived "reverse discrimination" by Howard university was "cause de jure" political ideology for conservatives. "

As Sheets Byrd use to say "WROOONNG"!!! For you forget allen, conservatives do not support affirmative action nor racial quotas. The conservative thought of view is that if Rachael had the grades to get in Howard, that good for her and that's the end of that.You left out the "other reasons" for her lawsuit that weren't racial such as her pregnancy, family responsibilities and her gender.

p allen " I would bet a dime to a dollar that most conservatives (and as her being a white woman) would have supported her racial discrimination lawsuit. You yourself Tyrone have repeatedly proposed the idea that there is no need for organizations such as the NAACP and HBCU's. So if you really, really, really, really want to make it an political ideological issue Tyrone, show some support for her discrimination suit (when she was white) against those unnecessary black organizations and educational institutions."

I would show support if her suit was "solely" about her being racially discriminated against by Howard and the evidence backed it. But her suit is old news. She filed the suit in 2002, it's 2015 so it's a mute point but nice try.

10:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Allen-"I just read a story in 2002, as a white woman, Dolezal sued historically black Howard University for racial discrimination. This story gets stranger by the day.

Coincidentally, she attended Howard University under a scholarship that same year and earned herself a Masters in Fine Arts degree. I am not too sure if Historically Black Colleges and Universities have opened their doors to non-black students. She was subsequently awarded a scholarship because the admission assumed that she was black for her work in African Art and sounded black over the phone. According to sources, admission were surprise that she was a white woman whom was awarded a scholarship to attend an HBCU. If she applied for a scholarship to attend a HBCU like Howard University, or applying anywhere by claiming she's black, if I'm correct, that is illegal. But I think Howard University does have their reason for not hiring Dolezal.

-BP

11:03 PM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"Up oh, you stepped into it now. Sit down and let me lecture to you a bit on this. Liberals hate America for the most part".

Even if "liberals" really did hate America, what does that have to do with passing for white, or passing for black? That is what were talking about, right? If a black person knowingly claims to be white, or a white person claims to be black, you're saying that this person is doing it because they hate America? Yet again, you're not making sense.

CB;"Who are the ones who came up with term "white privilege" allen? ".

Actually its something that I have studied for some time now. The theory was coined by a social scientist and writer by the name of Theodore W. Allen (no relation... that I know of).

CB;"They trash it based on race, from attacking Christopher Columbus, to the white settlers who came to the new world".

Again, what in the hell does Christopher Columbus have to do with passing??????

And wait just a doggone minute.... Ooohhh no Negro. I have to go off the topic in "passing for another race" because you really stepped in it!!! Why is the history of "white settlers" important to you? Didn't that happen 400 plus years ago? Black conservatives have been told that the history of slavery has no bearing on blacks today, right? Why is it that the "HISTORY" of white settlers bear historic importance and have lasting effects on America, yet the importation of "non-settler" Africans shouldn't have any lasting effects?

Your white conservatives buddies tell you that their ideal's are built on "the white settlers"... you know, the ones that the "liberals trash." The white settlers and the "founding fathers" are key to their "rich American history", and its that history is what made them are what they are today. Yet, those same settlers and founding fathers identified you as "Colored, Negro, African American, or Black", and yet that history should play no role in where or what you are today? There's no need for "black history" because it doesn't play a role, other that how you are identified? You're told there's no need for "black organizations" because its a "long gone era" that shouldn't effect you today. Yet today, you're still identified as something other than those "white settlers." They tell you that you're an American and that's all you need to know....

Your brain is so steeped in being accepted as a "conservative" that you don't even realize that the white settlers are responsible for you being classified as "Colored, Negro, African American, and Black." Their term for themselves was "European" and "English" when they came to these shores. The identity of "white" became a social construct when they chose to differentiate themselves from Native Americans and African slaves. The social construct and idea of "whiteness" was even decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1920's. But like Rachel Dolezal can't identify as black, don't ever try to tell them that you're white.

3:29 AM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

CB;"As Sheets Byrd use to say "WROOONNG"!!! For you forget allen, conservatives do not support affirmative action nor racial quotas".

Duhhhhhh? That's what I said. Conservatives don't support "affirmative action nor racial quotas." You've been told that Affirmative Action and racial quotas is "DISCRIMINATION." (or as some say, "reverse discrimination). Therefore, as a conservative, you are obligated to support a case of a white person who claims discrimination against a black oriented institution.

CB;"I would show support if her suit was "solely" about her being racially discriminated against by Howard and the evidence backed it. But her suit is old news. She filed the suit in 2002, it's 2015 so it's a mute point but nice try".

You believe that the NAACP is racist, right? You also believe that HBCU's are racist, right? You believe that the Congressional Black Caucus is racist, right? Thus, when a white person makes a claim against an organization that is, by your own definition "RACIST", as a conservative, you are obligated to support that white person. Moreover, if the idea of a discrimination lawsuit was so "MOOT" (not mute), you wouldn't even concern yourself with it, and stand "MUTE" on Affirmative Action or quotas. You should give that a "try."

CB;"The conservative thought of view is that if Rachael had the grades to get in Howard, that good for her and that's the end of that".

She had already gotten into Howard. The Politico article says that she sued because she was denied a "teaching assistant position, and that some of her artwork was removed from a student exhibition because of racial prejudice."

4:11 AM  
Blogger p. anthony allen said...

Big Pop;" I am not too sure if Historically Black Colleges and Universities have opened their doors to non-black students".

I am too sure that they do, and always have. "HBCU’s have always enrolled students of all races, but they are increasingly becoming less black."

Big Pop;"She was subsequently awarded a scholarship because the admission assumed that she was black for her work in African Art and sounded black over the phone. According to sources, admission were surprise that she was a white woman whom was awarded a scholarship to attend an HBCU".

Post a link to who reported those statements, and showing who they interviewed.

According to David Smedley, an associate professor of sculpture and coordinator of Howard’s sculpture program, he tells the Washington Post that Dolezal was a "blue eyed blond woman." I would assume that he saw her as white. Moreover, how could have it been possible for Dolezal to file a discrimination suit against Howard University "AS A WHITE WOMAN", if she wasn't enrolled as a WHITE WOMAN????

12:15 AM  
Blogger Alpha Conservative Male said...

p allen "
Even if "liberals" really did hate America, what does that have to do with passing for white, or passing for black? That is what were talking about, right? If a black person knowingly claims to be white, or a white person claims to be black, you're saying that this person is doing it because they hate America? Yet again, you're not making sense."

Nothing actually, my argument that you completely missed(surprise) was that she did what she did out of "WHITE GUILT". Also what I said was that liberals see patriotism and the love of it's values as a "white thing". Geez allen, try and pay attention. You want to read what you so desperately want to think I'm saying instead of what I'm actually saying.

p allen "
And wait just a doggone minute.... Ooohhh no Negro. I have to go off the topic in "passing for another race" because you really stepped in it!!! Why is the history of "white settlers" important to you?"

It's not important to me, it seems to be important to liberals for some matter. They have been making an issue about the race of Columbus, the settlers, the population of America and so on. Now you can go back on topic, if that was even remotely possible.


p allen "Your white conservatives buddies tell you that their ideal's are built on "the white settlers"

Really? That's odd, because I don't recall any of them telling me that in the local right wing conspiracy and pancake social meetings allen. It's liberals who make everything in America about racism, "white guilt, white privileged, income inequality, social justice blah blah blah".

p allen " Didn't that happen 400 plus years ago? Black conservatives have been told that the history of slavery has no bearing on blacks today, right? Why is it that the "HISTORY" of white settlers bear historic importance and have lasting effects on America, yet the importation of "non-settler" Africans shouldn't have any lasting effects? "

Yeah it did, so why don't progressives let it go then? All I have heard by black progressives who can't or won't address the real problems of the black community is that the problem is a result of slavery. Of course there is no evidence to back up so a foolish statement by them. They claim slavery is responsible for black poverty and crime, yet they can't explain why not all blacks are in poverty or in jail etc.

p allen "
Your brain is so steeped in being accepted as a "conservative" that you don't even realize that the white settlers are responsible for you being classified as "Colored, Negro, African American, and Black."

Again, really? I've always thought of myself a a light brown skinned man American of African descent. Glad you knew something I didn't know. Liberals created the hyphenated American terminology, African-American, Asian-American etc because they wanted to highlight that Indians are the "native" Americans and every other nationality and race are foreigners. I've used the term black but I've never though of myself as such. The true color of black is obviously darker then my complexion, wouldn't you say?

p allen" But like Rachel Dolezal can't identify as black, don't ever try to tell them that you're white. "

Since I do not have a mental disorder like Rachael Dolezal.It's a mute point.

6:26 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home